this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2025
289 points (92.9% liked)

World News

47724 readers
2640 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Archive article: https://archive.ph/shFsv

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 1 points 31 minutes ago

We're like Pokémon! Everyone everywhere wants to catch us. At home they really want to send people to Guantanamo. Abroad they need to exchange us for people kidnapped in el Salvador.

[–] Derpenheim@lemmy.zip 75 points 8 hours ago (3 children)

I mean, yeah, that's what a declaration of war usually entails.

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 16 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Trump doesn't even have the class to declare.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 5 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

He also can't. Proclamations of war are made by the legislature. (Congress). If the President sends troops in a supposed emergency they can go without legislative consent for 90 days and must be recalled at that time without the legislature's approval. It's stupid, because 90 days into a conflict we have troops on the ground and an immediate evacuation only hurts us economically and global appearance some worry about. Not to mention the troops lost/injured, casualties left with those attacked and Congress not agreeing to keep them there is an admission that it was wrong, so not paying restitution would hurt international relations as well.

To me it comes to, if he orders troops on the ground, an immediate Congressional impeachment would be needed, and the Senate to remove him, or they will vote in favor of staying in the fight to "save face" and not care how many innocent lives die or are thrown into poverty, starve, are raped, wrongly imprisoned, tortured, and the damages it will cause to the mental health of a whole new generation of our soilders and people of other counties around the world.

[–] KMAMURI@lemmy.world 2 points 57 minutes ago

You're speaking like you have a functional government.

[–] FuckFascism@lemmy.world 6 points 4 hours ago

Not the citizens part

[–] Zorque@lemmy.world 28 points 7 hours ago (4 children)

It used to be that non-combatants weren't considered legitimate targets. Ain't progress fun?

[–] Anomalocaris@lemm.ee 27 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

tell that to all the civilians in Guantanamo and Gaza.

if the first aggressor doesn't give a fuck about rule of war, it can't complain about them

[–] matlag@sh.itjust.works 9 points 3 hours ago

Or Ukraine's civilians. Or the 500k--2M dead civilians during the war against Iraq. Oh, sorry, those were "collateral"...

Usually citizens are not considered fair targets. They're just targeted all the same.

Iran does not have the military capabilities to fight off Israel, let alone the USA. So they will most likely use terrorist attacks, targeting civilians, because that's the best hope they have to end the war: when the people back home get serious about ending it as they're taking losses.

Unfortunately, and as usual, the very important people who decide to keep going or stop are also the least likely to see their life at risk. And in this case, they also happen to not give a flying fuck about civilians lives.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmings.world 9 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

In the history of the world, it has only been a very short window during the late 20th/ early 21 st century that civilians were not considered fair game in war, although they get slaughtered anyway. Even with civilians being off limits, as recently as WW2, Korea, Vietnam, and the Middle East, civilians have been targets either by design, by atrocity, or by proximity.

If there's a war, don't think you're getting off the hook just because you're a civilian. During war, the old adage "If your not with us, you're against us" becomes weaponized.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Well, it used to be that they were too. Have you heard of all the cities in Europe that were effectively destroyed during WWII?

It comes and goes, usually whenever it's useful. It sucks, but war is horrible. If civilians don't want to be targets they should pressure their governments to not be in them. Yes, sometimes it's worth fighting, but sometimes it isn't.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 14 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

Americans have only ever pretended to care about non-combatants when it's convenient. President Obama even invented the term 'enemy combatant' so he could pretend his drone strikes were killing fewer civilians.

[–] Uranus_Hz@lemm.ee 1 points 2 hours ago

I thought that term first came in vogue during Dubya’s term.

[–] brown567@sh.itjust.works 29 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

🎶 Everybody's going to the party, have a real good time

Dancing in the desert, blowing up the sunshine 🎶

[–] CorruptCheesecake@lemmy.world 23 points 8 hours ago

WHY DO THEY ALWAYS SEND THE POOR??

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 35 points 10 hours ago

To the surprize of absolutely no one, maybe exept the US government.

[–] flamingo_pinyata@sopuli.xyz 75 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

The headline is somewhat misleading. Iran said US personnel are legitimate targets (meaning those employed by the US government. Not all US citizens.

Although if I were American I would not risk depending on the judgment of a random Iranian soldier.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 25 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

First sentence:

Iran announced Sunday that any American civilian or military personnel in the region are now considered legitimate targets

So yes, still not all Americans, but no, not just government employees, American civilians too.

But I suspect non-military people will be arrested, not treated as military targets to be attacked or bombed.

[–] Zexks@lemmy.world 9 points 7 hours ago

After we've droned some of their people. I wouldn't put money on that.

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 42 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

Haha welp, guess we have airline bombings to look forward to in the future

This timeline fucking blows, guys.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 14 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (3 children)

My best guess is that they'll use biological warfare. Our culture has already demonstrated that this is a huge weakness. They could also get us with a cyber attack, shutting down important infrastructure that way.

[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 9 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Our government is exceptional at dealing in violence but inept at handling threats that it can't beat, shoot, or bomb into submission.

The societal response and government handling of COVID was not at all reassuring. To the point that I let go of any last remaining shred of hope I had for us to turn this ship around on several metrics (e.g. climate change). And unfortunately I think it has gotten even worse, e.g. with the (at least apparent) increase in anti-vaxxers.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 4 points 4 hours ago

Same. My city reopened in Mid-June 2020 and I remember going to the gym and seeing people pretending the virus was gone, no masks, distancing, or wiping down the equipment. People are disgusting.

So I still mask up and carry sanitizer.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmings.world 10 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

Release Ebola or some such thing in America, and the MAGAs will make sure no laws or mandates are passed to prevent it's spread. 50% of the population will be gone within a year, destroying our society without firing a shot.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

It would be oddly poetic to use our own basic grossness against us. Americans have terrible hygiene.

[–] SulaymanF@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago

Iran would not do that, but you raise an important point about how insanely vulnerable the US is to actual biological attacks.

Could you imagine the US government trying to get Americans to get an anthrax vaccine after a weapon attack?

[–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

I really don't think Iran's leaders are that foolish, after what happened last time someone did that.

[–] match@pawb.social 11 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

The stronger-than-ever Taliban?

[–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

How many senior Taliban members are still alive from those days? The organisation persists, most of the leadership didn't.

[–] Uranus_Hz@lemm.ee 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 hours ago

No, but they can certainly kill the Ayatollahs, and I don't think they're willing to die for the cause.

[–] BackgrndNoize@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

Oh yeah America really taught them a lesson by, checks notes, giving Taliban control of Afghanistan, after pouring millions of dollars and ending the lives of thousands of Afghani and Americans

[–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 hours ago

They quite famously killed the guy in charge, is what I'm getting at.

[–] PunkRockSportsFan@fanaticus.social 109 points 13 hours ago (3 children)

Oh good. Americans will die.

Trump will be fine.

But Americans are gonna die.

Trump is a traitor Nazi.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Oh good. Americans will die.

Trump will be fine.

I dunno. Iran got caught by American intelligence trying to assassinate Trump not long ago, under Biden.

[–] El_guapazo@lemmy.world 23 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Maybe they can blow up his hotels and golf courses. He'd actually care more.

[–] Kirp123@lemmy.world 58 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (2 children)

More Americans died of Covid than in any war the US was involved since it became a country, yes including the Civil War. The highest death estimate for the Civil War puts it around 750 000 deaths while around 1 200 000 died due to Covid. Most Americans don't really care about the deaths of their fellow countrymen since, you know, they elected him again.

Fun Fact (I know it's not that fun): The number of people that died of Covid approaches the total number of people that died in all conflicts the US was involved from 1775 to 2019: 1 300 000 war dead versus 1 200 000 Covid dead

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

By 2000 more Americans had died of AIDS than any war but the civil war. Though I will admit I was surprised we still didn't care when it wasn't just undesirables dying. Turns out we're able to be ablist enough to declare anyone who dies of disease basically already dead beforehand

[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 20 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

there’s still time to get those numbers up

[–] rumimevlevi@lemmings.world 71 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

The article provide zero proof of the claim in the title

[–] notastatist@feddit.org 74 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Its because its israeli News and it fits their propaganda.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 21 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

While I don't recommend believing them non-conditionally, Haaretz has generally been opposed to Netanyahu and hid actions, especially after he picked a fight with them earlier this year.

[–] SulaymanF@lemmy.world 6 points 3 hours ago

Even the Israeli left parties (and Ha’aretz is on the left) supports war on Iran even if they were less supportive of the genocide in Gaza. They still have a bias.

[–] floo@retrolemmy.com 34 points 12 hours ago
[–] Punchshark@lemmy.ca 6 points 12 hours ago

Buy the ticket, take the ride!