this post was submitted on 24 Jun 2025
176 points (99.4% liked)

News

30438 readers
2633 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The provision was aimed at curbing nationwide injunctions imposed by judges that have blocked some high-profile Trump administration policies.

Senate Democrats forced the removal of a provision in Republicans' sweeping domestic policy bill that sought to restrict the power of courts to block federal government policies with injunctions or restraining orders.

Democrats are challenging a broad range of provisions in the "One Big Beautiful Bill Act" for compliance with Senate budget rules that Republicans are relying on to bypass the 60-vote hurdle in the chamber to advance most legislation.

A Democratic aide on the Senate Budget Committee confirmed that Senate Parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough, the in-house referee, ruled the provision did not comply with the “Byrd rule,” which says provisions must be directly related to taxes or spending.

top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 28 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

I feel like they're trying to remove a lot of the crazy stuff in this bill, so people will accept them voting for it when it's just massive tax cuts for the rich and raising taxes for the rest of us.

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

There was an article during Obama's years that showed the negotiation tactics of Republicans and the summary was exactly what you wrote: Republicans draft bills with shit that they know will anger Democrats, but they'll use it to pass the other shit that they want to pass.

Democrats fall for it every fucking time.

The article went on to say that compromise occurs far more often on the conservative side more often than the liberal side, meaning that Democrats often will give up far more than Republicans will.

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 10 points 3 hours ago

Well you say fall for it. I'd say participate in the performative theatre.

[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 7 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

The point of the crazy stuff in is so the tax cuts are not the crazy part in that context. They make that the easy target and make the Dems feel like they accomplished something and got some compromise when the GOP really got what they wanted in the end.

It's like keeping a few weapons on you hidden badly so they don't find the ones you hid well. Or when you send a movie to the MPAA for rating that you're afraid will get the movie-killing NC-17 rating, so you intentionally seed the movie with even more gratuitous sex and violence so that you have something to cut to compromise with the MPAA and you end up with the movie and the rating you wanted in the first place.

Fun fact: If you've ever seen Sausage Party, that's what the super long vulgar sex scene at the end was supposed to be. It was bait for the MPAA's complaints so they could cut it to get the R rating they wanted. But the MPAA only came back with a single complaint, the Pita Bread's (I believe?) pubic hair on his scrotum. So Seth Rogan said... "Oooookay!" Removed the pubes and released the movie with the rest of the sex scene intact. Cuz when are you ever going to have that chance again?

[–] Stamau123@lemmy.world 16 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Look at that, actually politicking, never thought I'd see the day

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 hours ago

This is all a distraction from the tax cuts for the rich that the democrats aren’t fighting against.

[–] Tempus_Fugit@midwest.social 11 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I commend the Dems for accomplishing something, but I feel like it will matter little for the near future. They've already been successfully dodging the courts or just not complying with almost no recourse.

[–] cattywampas@lemm.ee 0 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

There has been a ton done by this administration that was successfully and rightfully blocked by the courts. What have they been able to dodge? There was the Kilmar Abrego Garcia situation which they dragged their feet on, but that was eventually resolved too.

[–] Tempus_Fugit@midwest.social 7 points 3 hours ago

Well they're still sending folks to CECOT, bringing us into yet another Middle East conflict, deploying state level military into their own state to run security for the feds, denying folks their rights all over the place, running illegal crypto scams, selling bribes, illegally firing federal workers, defunding Congress level agencies, the list goes on and on and on and on... The fact that the courts can just be ignored shows they have no real power and can be stepped on as Trump pleases.