this post was submitted on 24 Jun 2025
73 points (97.4% liked)

politics

24338 readers
3094 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

JD Vance has suggested Iran’s estimated 400kg (882lb) stockpile of enriched uranium, which is just short of weapons-grade, remains intact despite the recent US bombing campaign against Iran.

On Monday, the vice-president told Fox News that the location of the uranium “is not the question before us”, and said the relevant question was: “Can Iran enrich the uranium to weapons-grade level and can they convert that fuel into a nuclear weapon?”

The Iranian stockpile of uranium was believed to have been located mainly at Isfahan, which houses a conversion facility that turns uranium into the form that can be fed into centrifuges for enrichment.

top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Akasazh@feddit.nl 1 points 11 minutes ago

James Donald Bowman say what?

[–] ThePantser@sh.itjust.works 21 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

So not mission accomplished? Or is this just priming another invasion?

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 11 points 5 hours ago

Yes to both, as of the last I heard that there was no radiation detected after the strikes so the stockpiles were unlikely to be hit.

The mission was a failure and they will continue to use the spectrum of a threat even if they had hit the stockpile.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 30 points 5 hours ago (3 children)

If they weren't making weapons grade uranium before...

They sure as shit are now

[–] flandish@lemmy.world 14 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

and they should. they were just bombed by a nation known for its use of nuclear weapons on civilians. they need all the protection they can get.

[–] cmbabul@lemmy.world 4 points 36 minutes ago

The number one geopolitical strategic lesson of the past 10 years is "Get nukes and never ever ever give them up"

[–] Chocrates@lemmy.world 5 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Pretty sure their parliament passed a law withdrawing from the Nuclear Nonproliferation treaty.

I don't get why they don't have one now though

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

Gonna need some well balanced centrifuges for that.

[–] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 9 points 4 hours ago

So the mission that is likely to spark regional wars in the Middle East was either a success, or it wasn't. And Israel and Iran have agreed to a ceasefire, unless Iran hasn't.

Ladies and gentlemen, the Trump administration.

[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

Put down the WMDs!

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 1 points 4 hours ago

Alright Couch Fucker, why don't you do the whole human race a favor and go over there to personally find and reveal the Uranium. You cost probably just carry it out.