this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2025
1061 points (99.6% liked)

News

30462 readers
3535 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Former Gov. Andrew Cuomo conceded New York City’s Democratic mayoral primary to Zohran Mamdani as the 33-year old member of the state Assembly had a significant lead in the race Tuesday night.

Cuomo’s concession came as the race’s outcome will be decided by a ranked choice count after neither Democrat got a clear majority in the vote.

Mamdani, a 33-year-old democratic socialist member of the state Assembly, started to pull ahead with more than an estimated 80% of ballots counted.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 54 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (3 children)

Poor people be voting for the conservative while higher income people be voting for the socialist. This is so ironic...

Edit: Source: https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2025/06/24/us/elections/nyc-mayor-primary-results-precinct-map.html

[–] Rakonat@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

It depends where the cut off is. But there's a lot of educated people that fall into the higher income category that all too aware what rampant poverty and inequality can do to cause instability. His policies might not benefit them the most but it would still benefit them in some way.

[–] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 5 points 7 hours ago

It's makes you want to cry or throw a big shiny round bomb in someone's gilded carriage. One of those two.

[–] XeroxCool@lemmy.world 6 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Looks like the lower income is the Bronx and a bit of Brooklyn. Higher income is Manhattan and the Brooklyn/queens riverfront. The middle income map is more like what I'd expect to see overall based on the neighborhoods. More Cuomo for Staten Island/False New Jersey as well as east Brooklyn/Queens/Don't call it Long Island (even though they act like Nassau county is out in the country). There's a bunch of conservative, racist pricks that insist on NYC being the greatest (so they're definitely part of it) but off in homeowning urban areas pissed that they're making suburb money but paying urban prices. All while refusing to enjoy the fun parts of the city because they don't like the people there.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 32 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

Bu- bu- but is he gonna visit Israel? /s

contextIn a debate they asked where candidates would visit. Once one of them said they'd visit Israel, a lot of others said they would too. Mamdani basically said he'd stay in NYC because he'd be the mayor and it's important to focus on his constituents. So then the moderators are like "Just to clarify, you wouldn't visit Israel?" And he's like I wanna focus on New Yorkers then they're like "Do you support Israel's right to exist as a Jewish state?" 🙄 Absolutely insane. The man just answers "where would you visit" by saying he wouldn't travel so he can focus on constituents and it turns into a purity test about his views on Israel's existence? Just shameful. Like imagine if someone is like "I'll have a salad" and then the waiter asks "Do you support cattle farmer's right to earn a living?"

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] merdaverse@lemmy.world 15 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

How long util he gets couped by the CIA?

[–] eestileib@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 13 hours ago

They're already pre-announcing the Reichstag Fire they're about to stage.

(I'm assuming it will be executed with the full and enthusiastic cooperation of the nypd)

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 5 points 13 hours ago

CIA doesn't even need to get involved. Just a "terrorist" accusation and arrest them.

[–] blaggle42@lemmy.today 75 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

The fact that Clinton endorsed Cuomo is the cherry on top.

[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 31 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

When do you think they'll realize their name is poisonous? Or would that require more introspection than a Clinton is even capable of?

[–] blaggle42@lemmy.today 7 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

I'm suspicious that sociopaths are a parasitic subspecies. Like there are these alien creatures that look entirely human walking around among us. They look like us, talk like us, but think that the general human species is inferior to their own.

What if they could identify other sociopaths, and were working in concert. Hmm, this is ridiculous.

Anyway, yeah. I don't think Clinton is capable of that level of introspection.

[–] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 3 points 6 hours ago

I'm suspicious that sociopaths are a parasitic subspecies.

That's an interesting perspective. I wouldn't go so far as to dehumanise them, though. I think they're just another type of human — that's particularly well adapted at fucking shit up in such a way that they, and potentially their ingroup, come out on top.

It's a highly unfortunate type of person of course and a very likely cause for the premature death of our biosphere if it comes to that.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works 104 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

"Nearly a quarter of early voters had not voted in a Democratic primary at any point between 2012 and 2024."

https://gothamist.com/news/nyc-primary-results-2025-election

Here you go folks- GET INVOLVED! Go vote! Every single election, especially primaries.

[–] Coyote_sly@lemmy.world 4 points 6 hours ago

Alternately: people actually fucking vote when you give them something, anything, to vote for!

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 39 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

Holy shit! It happened! I'm elated.

Edit: Congrats New Yorkers!

[–] ArchmageAzor@lemmy.world 14 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I'm honestly surprised Mamdani is still alive in the US, given his name.

It's like hearing about a mayor in a town in Nazi Germany named Abram Mankowitz.

[–] Horsey@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

NYC is easily the most diverse and integrated major city in the country. That kind of rhetoric doesn’t apply to the majority of NYC.

[–] boolean_sledgehammer@lemmy.world 67 points 20 hours ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Absaroka@lemmy.world 48 points 19 hours ago (8 children)

If this election was held in 2023, you have to wonder if the outcome would have been wildly different.

For once, an encouraging sign for sanity and common sense.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 117 points 22 hours ago (6 children)

So you don't have to spend millions on a liberal Joe Rogan, or attack trans people, or support genocide to win a race in America? God damn, that's incredible!

I'm very happy to hear this news. Genuinely one of the best news I've heard all year round. Maybe there is a sliver of hope.

[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 29 points 19 hours ago (7 children)

I have seen articles saying that a Zohran win would force the Democratic Party to face change, and acknowledge the rising progressive movement. Let's see if they accept the changes, or they fight against it. I suspect they'll fight, but if other elections start moving left, they'll be forced to change.

The next big test will be the mid-term primaries. Hopefully, this win will encourage progressives to run, and hopefully they'll win enough primary races to become a serious threat, especially against Establishment Dems.

And I hope one of them is AOC primarying Chuck Schumer. That spineless, whining bitch has got to go. He holds a lot of the blame for the rise of MAGA.

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 4 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

I think they'll try to slow the progress as much as possible. They'll run candidates that like promise 50% of what the further-left candidate promises, cook up a resume that makes them look more "experienced" than the more further-left candidate, then when they win, they only do 10% of what's promised, then find excuses, while continuing to masquerade as a progressive.

I mean, if I were a greedy rich person, that's how I'll manipulate politics.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] dhork@lemmy.world 37 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

I don't mean to blunt your enthusiasm, but this was just a primary election, so only registered Democrats were voting here. So a much different demographic than 51 separate Presidential elections. But still, it's a sign that the voters in the city are fed up with the politics-as-usual the party is force-feeding them.

There are a lot more Democrats than Republicans there, though, so this should give him the inside track for the job, especially if Cuomo backs down from his threat to run Independant. (I think he knows that if he did that, he will never win an endorsement from any other Democrat, ever, so that may give him pause.) Adams is running as an independant, but I think the city is done with him. Curtis Sliwa is the Republican nominee, but he hasn't been relevant since the 80s and 90s, and is kind of a cartoon now.

[–] Tinidril@midwest.social 16 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

You are way understating his odds at winning the general.

Your implicit argument that so-called "centrist" Democrats are better at winning purple states because voters all exist along a simple left to right spectrum is absolutely wrong. The people in this country are fed up and they want revolution. Republicans offered it, and Democrats didn't. The rightward lurch was just an artifact of people rationalizing their vote and conforming to the stereotype on offer.

One big excuse the Democratic establishment gave was that the world is in an anti-incombancy mood. That's a correct observation, but what is really happening is the death of neoliberalism everywhere. The one big outlier to the trend was Mexico where an aging male President successfully handed the reigns over to his protege, a younger woman. The difference is, they were progressives. Mexico is also arguably a more religiously conservative country than America.

The wonky framing of the US electorate has been the standard Democratic perspective for decades. It's what led to the income inequality we have now. It's what led to Trump, and the complete routing of Democrats in both federal and state governments. For the love of God, wake up already.

The Democrats don't win because they aren't real people, they are characters on TV that people are sick of. Neoliberalism drains the blood and passion that people want to see in leadership. Republicans have it, and Democrats don't. It's past time that changed.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] wpb@lemmy.world 21 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Watch that rat fuck run as independent to split the vote.

[–] DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 15 hours ago (4 children)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] oh_@lemmy.world 50 points 20 hours ago (9 children)

Good. The Democratic machine didn’t want this. It happened anyways. Maybe they will pull head from ass. (Doubtful)

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 7 points 14 hours ago

Democrats need to be unapologetic in their stances to critics on both sides.

[–] Godric@lemmy.world 9 points 15 hours ago

Ya love to see it

[–] BigTrout75@lemmy.world 269 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (10 children)

This is why ranked choice has been banned in a lot of places. It breaks the duopoly.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›