similar situation
Fuck AI
"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"
A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.
I didn't remember this so I looked it up.
According to GoogleGPT she purposely gave that recipe to teach the town how to make mustard gas but made a little whoopsie because instead of everyone getting to make their mustard gas it actually makes Chloramine.
And that it's a recurring theme of the show that people get the recipe wrong. Aw shucks, just not teaching people the correct way to make mustard gas.
Full story (from memory, so beware): There's a new head of the local paper and Peggy wants to work there. On the way to the interview, she spills something and Minh overhears her and tells her to shut up because they're doing their crossword puzzles. Peggy complains about the stain, Minh gives her some advice.
Once there, the paper isn't super interested in another journalist, but wants a helpful hints column. Peggy regurgitates Minh's advice and gets the job. She goes back to Minh for more tips and agrees to give her the answers to the crossword puzzles in exchange. Eventually, Minh's source (her mother in law) pisses her off and after she snaps back, she can't get anymore tips. That's when Peggy goes home and just try to think of something and comes up with the "tip."
She's bragging in bed, and that's when Hank let's her know, as apparently Cotton made it regularly when he was a kid. After some highjinks that bring in the B-Plot, Peggy comes clean to the paper. The paper says it's fine, they have a fact checker (who will likely get fire for this), but he likes her writing so he gives her the job.
The end.
Is there an alternative network to the internet? One without SEO or AI? I'm very sick of the internet being untrustworthy because of marketers and robots, it's a bit heartbreaking to me.
I considered making a search engine based on verified real people, but I have not enough time or resources to create such a thing.
Finding human content is going to be like getting pre WW2 steel
I can't even necessarily picture how that would work, unfortunately! Did you have a plan for how that might work?
It's getting tough, I agree :/
One can only hope a modern library of Alexandria exists, cause soon they'll rewrite all information with ai on the internet and you won't even have sources anymore to countercheck ai results
Isn't it tragic, that such a fantastic tool to gather and share and collaborate on all of human knowledge (and to share memes) has been ruined for the sake of inflating wallets?
When will ordinary people finally figure out that AI only provides the illusion of intelligence.
It should be renamed to SI for Simulated Intelligence.
I'm starting to think that ordinary people only provide the illusion of intelligence, too
Sure. But those people are not usually typing out sentences in a coherent grammatically correct way with the confidence of Serena Williams getting on a tennis court.
There is considerable overlap between the intelligence of the smartest bears and the dumbest tourists
The quote is attributed to a park ranger from Yosemite in the 80's, though I can't find any more details.
I do wonder how much overlap there is between AI and dumb people. Of course, "intelligence" is more complicated than that, but still I wonder how many people would have done something like put Elmer's glue in their pizza cheese without needing AI to tell them. Either on their own or because they didn't understand someone was joking.
Advanced predictive text
The scientists never called it an AI in the first place. It is still a Machine Learning Model. Zero intelligence behind that. The term was abused by idiotic managers. And one of them (at least) is already talking about AGI.
Coherent sentences have been a shorthand for "intelligent and thoughtful" for a very long time. Breaking that and forcing people to think about what they're reading is going to be extremely hard.
But people won’t invest trillions of dollars into Simulated Intelligence!
Just like everything on the internet it was trained on
I really dislike the tone that chatgpt writes in.
Chlorine gas poisoning is NOT the vibe we're going for with this one. Let's file that one in the Woopsy Bads file!"
Just.. ugh.
Well it's trained off how people on the internet speak so....
Who tf on the internet talks like that?
UWU senpai that is the wrong reagent!
ChatGPT has memories if you are logged in. I told it on my account to never use emojis or talk with any sort of personality. It saved it as a memory and it hasn't made me want to smash its face in after that.
CORRECTED STEP 2: THE SOAK OF RIGHTEOUSNESS
Idk why but chatGPT using emojis makes me irrationally annoyed.
Almost as annoyed as realizing a very very small handful of people are getting grossly enriched as their slop machines literally try to get people killed...
The tone of the whole "oops I tried to kill you" response is inappropriately unserious...like "not the witchy potion we want"? If a person was trying to be cute and stuff after making such a serious error, I think we would all be justifiably very annoyed.
You can see from the previous prompt that it is already being "fun". The user almost certainly prompted it do so.
In fact we can't actually tell that the user didn't prompt the bot to be a clutzy fub "witch" who makes serious mistakes and feels bad about it.
And the way that LLMs work, it would absolutely be more likely to say something stupid that way than if you told it that it was a genius science communicator.
How are people so fucking lazy and stupid that they need to go to GPT to learn how to clean correctly?
The problem is not that this person asked chatgpt for cleaning tips (tbh it's pretty cringe to call someone lazy and stupid for trying to learn something 🙄 Have you seriously never looked up how to clean something weirdly specific? And I suppose those who weren't lucky enough to have parents who taught them how to adult properly are lazy and stupid when they try to learn?)
The bigger problem is that LLMs are being used to create content for the web. So now someone who knows they can't just mix any old chemicals together is going to Google whether bleach and vinegar are safe to mix and find a bunch of websites that have contradictory info.
These people, whether they use LLM to search or to create content, aren't even the root of the problem. Expecting that everyone is tech savvy enough to understand the limitations of generative AIs and how untrustworthy they can be is an unrealistic standard, especially in a world where everyone and their brother is using them and they seem like miracles of technology.
The responsibility lies with the companies that keep touting this technology as something it is not and who refuse to put meaningful limitations on them, and with governments who are dragging their feet in regulating them.
One of the ways people use chatGPT is like a search engine. Would you consider someone lazy and stupid for goggling how to clean correctly?
When you can Google that normally, I find it pretty dumb. Yes.
Google returns "AI Overview" at the top of most searches tho, and includes an option to "dive deeper in AI mode"...
Yes, because they used google
does vinegar make the same chlorine gas that ammonia does?
I always thought it was only ammonia.
Bleach + ammonia = chloramine
Bleach + vinegar = chlorine gas
Both are harmful
You shouldn’t combine bleach with basically any acid, because the same reaction can occur to free the chlorine in bleach and create chlorine gas. Vinegar is a weak acid so it will probably create less by volume than a similar amount of ammonia would, but you don’t want to breathe it.
huh TIL, thanks.
Message unclear, pours all over the AI computers.