this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2025
1086 points (96.6% liked)

Microblog Memes

8400 readers
2311 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Katana314@lemmy.world 68 points 2 days ago (15 children)

I’ve been curious if a government-run dating app could do better - if its goal is to achieve genuine engagement, not cycles of frustration that boost subscription rates.

This is one of many subjects where capitalist concern ruins the product (and that’s not even something I say as often as others on Lenny)

[–] kadup@lemmy.world 89 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Honestly, 90% of the need for dating apps would vanish if people had more free time away from work and well-kept public spaces for entertainment that didn't expect you to purchase anything.

So rather than a government-run dating app, how about a government-sanctioned 4 day work week and well kept public parks?

[–] grue@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Yet again, low-density exclusionary zoning causing car-dependency (which is why the "third spaces" you're talking about have all-but disappeared) is revealed as the root cause of almost every problem we have.

[–] Lifecoach5000@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I don’t know if I buy that. I think people simply like hiding behind a screen for many interactions these days - including dating.

Not that Im against your idea but maybe just the 90% part seems inflated.

[–] kadup@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Perhaps, but we would need to put the idea in practice to determine what's the cause/effect relationship here.

Are people more addicted to their screens because the real world became hostile, or is the real world becoming hostile because people are glued to their screens?

I'd bet on the first option, but I could be wrong.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

But who makes the profit in your silly goose scenario? Somebody has to be making money or it's a terrible idea!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] turtlesareneat@discuss.online 27 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I run a social club for gay men, and we've talked about coming up with an app that's run by a non-profit, with social workers on the board, that's designed to actually connect people, not keep them glued to the app. Friendship, dates, activity partners, whatever.

I don't know why no one has come up with the non-profit model here but if I can get enough steam, we're doing it.

[–] okmko@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

But even non-profits need to pay for operating costs like salary and cloud fees. Where would you get the funding for that?

[–] JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca 11 points 2 days ago (6 children)

The app doesn't need to be free, and the revenue stream won't dry up if it actually works because people break up, and there are so many fucking people that even in a zero sum scenario it would take forever to reach saturation.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] haui_lemmy@lemmy.giftedmc.com 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You said capitalism and summoned your resident anticapitalist. How can I be of assistance, comrade. :D

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Looking for an anticapitalist on lemmy is like looking for a lesbian at a Teagan and Sara concert. It's not everybody, but it's not a difficult search

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Simulation6@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 day ago

National Lampoon had an article once called 'Girls of the Soviet Block'. When you said government run dating app, it made me think how hilarious that turned out.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] mavu@discuss.tchncs.de 44 points 2 days ago (4 children)

I think we should make dating apps even worse, and just let humanity die out naturally.

[–] Mediocre_Bard@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I bet that the Pandas would step in and keep us going.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Headofthebored@lemmy.world 22 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I am forklift certified. I do not need this.

I'd hate to be the one to say this, but that's not what people mean by "picking up girls."

[–] hOrni@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

What the fuck is a 17 year old doing at a job?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Here's a concept: women over 29 years old don't view Tinder as a good option for finding decent men. Therefore only the most desperate are the ones who sign up to display themselves on the digital meat market.

[–] ExtraordinaryJoe@lemmy.world 25 points 2 days ago (10 children)

In my 50s and I don't bother anymore. It's just not worth the hassle. In my 30s I would have had to send out 100 messages to get 1 date. It's so much worse in my 50s.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] Delphia@lemmy.world 58 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Ha!

As a middle aged man you think its great for us? You think all the hot, sane, independent women in their 30s and 40s are strugging for options? If you're on there theres a 80% chance that you're no catch either.

Last time my dude showed me a bunch of profiles it was easily 50% "applications to be a stepdad" and 25% women with a checklist (6 foot tall, good living, own house, etc.) Like 6 foot tall athletic lawyers who own their own home are having trouble meeting women.

[–] TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today 20 points 2 days ago (9 children)

You think all the hot, sane, independent women in their 30s and 40s are strugging for options?

You'd be surprised..... My wife is in a professional dance company full of single ladies ranging in age from 20s to late 30's. Most of them are on the struggle bus when it comes to finding a decent partner who isn't a lazy bum or a rampant misogynist.

Tbh most of the dudes in long term relationships with the dancers are just regular everyday dudes. Imo the bar is pretty low nowadays considering that like 1/3 of dudes have been brain poisoned by Joe Rogan/Jordan Peterson.

[–] VitoRobles@lemmy.today 17 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Married dude here who has a lot of single dude friends. 1/3 is accurate.

And if it's not Rogan, it's some other right-adjacent influencer. It's fucking weird too. They're regular dudes, helping old ladies on the street and supporting a neighbor. Then suddenly, they crack and share how terrible women are.

Then you got women who are on the other side, complaining about how terrible men are.

I don't understand it.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] sqgl@sh.itjust.works 16 points 2 days ago

Social media is raising expectations to unrealistic levels. As if Hollywood wasn't bad enough for past generations.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 198 points 3 days ago (13 children)

A confounding issue is the apps themselves have gotten worse over time. Like, old okcupid you could search. You could type in like "final fantasy" or "the Mets" and find people who liked those things enough to put them on their profile.

Now you're limited to whatever the app decides to give you. Well, the app doesn't want you to leave so that incentive doesn't line up.

[–] spamfajitas@lemmy.dbzer0.com 104 points 3 days ago (10 children)

A lot of the more popular ones, okcupid included, all got bought up by Match Group and almost immediately started trending anti-consumer in their updates or removal of features. They want you paying, they don't give a shit about success.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[–] MoreFPSmorebetter@lemmy.zip 68 points 3 days ago (20 children)

I still remember when bumble had to change their entire premise and business model because as it turns out women are worse at starting conversations than men lmao.

I wholeheartedly believe that the Internet and smart phones have been the biggest double edge swords in human history. We have the entire globes collected knowledge at our fingertips with the ability to connect with any other person on the planet instantly and it has caused the largest shift in loneliness and depression ever.

Humans simply are not wired for social media and the Internet. Seeing every single person you know posting themselves beautiful and dressed up doing the coolest things 24/7 will make anyone feel ugly and like they aren't doing anything with their lives. It takes real focused effort to remember that people (generally) only post when they are doing something special and what you don't see are the days or weeks between posts that show they live the same boring life you live.

I'm ranting for no reason. I think when we lost in person social gatherings as the primary method of meeting new people is when society kicked that concrete block off the cliff. Right now we are just waiting for the rope to snap taught and drag us all into the abyss.

load more comments (20 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›