this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2025
144 points (96.8% liked)

politics

24584 readers
2893 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] blattrules@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago

I can’t wait to see what no consequences he’ll face for this.

[–] miss_demeanour@lemmy.dbzer0.com 25 points 2 days ago (1 children)

He'll deliver an EO tomorrow declaring 'Shylock' to be a superlative to 'Rabbi'.

[–] ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 2 days ago

deliver an EO

Is that a euphemism for shitting an EO?

[–] ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works 14 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I doubt that Trump has ever read Shakespeare.

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 35 points 2 days ago (2 children)

He has, however, read a collection of Hitler's speeches:

Last April, perhaps in a surge of Czech nationalism, Ivana Trump told her lawyer Michael Kennedy that from time to time her husband reads a book of Hitler's collected speeches, My New Order, which he keeps in a cabinet by his bed. Kennedy now guards a copy of My New Order in a closet at his office, as if it were a grenade. Hitler's speeches, from his earliest days up through the Phony War of 1939, reveal his extraordinary ability as a master propagandist.

"Did your cousin John give you the Hitler speeches?" I asked Trump.

Trump hesitated. "Who told you that?"

"I don't remember," I said.

"Actually, it was my friend Marty Davis from Paramount who gave me a copy of Mein Kampf, and he's a Jew." ("I did give him a book about Hitler," Marty Davis said. "But it was My New Order, Hitler's speeches, not Mein Kampf. I thought he would find it interesting. I am his friend, but I'm not Jewish.")

Later, Trump returned to this subject. "If I had these speeches, and I am not saying that I do, I would never read them."

[–] postman@literature.cafe 4 points 1 day ago

I think I first heard this from an article by Tony Schwartz who wrote The Art of the Deal. He mentioned seeing the speeches book by Trump's bed during one of their brief meetings about Trump's book, which Trump took no part in.

[–] Kirp123@lemmy.world 25 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'm more surprised that he reads. I thought he was basically illiterate lol.

[–] mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

The most likely theory is that he desperately needs reading glasses, but is too proud to wear them. So he simply can’t read anything in public, because he needs the glasses that he keeps in his room.

[–] rigatti@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

He does read the teleprompter occasionally, but the reading glasses theory makes sense.

[–] DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

He often squints reading the prompter, and he has to concentrate so his manner of speech moderates significantly. Then you see him flip the switch to freewheeling bullshit.

[–] postman@literature.cafe 2 points 1 day ago

I think he's one of those readers who cannot take in the content of text while focusing on reading. You'll notice he only starts freewheeling on the last word or two of a sentence or paragraph. That's all he's heard.

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I doubt that Trump has ever read ~~Shakespeare~~.

[–] ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.org 13 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I doubt that Trump has ever read anything.

Having said that, he could have watched this excellent Merchant of Venice movie starrting Al Pacino, so he would know who Shylock is.

[–] LesserAbe@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Busting out the slur deep cuts

[–] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 day ago

Seriously. Dude's got mush brain and was steeped in racism starting in the 50s. I'm surprised he hasn't called anyone a wop or mick yet

[–] DahGangalang@infosec.pub 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

(Edit) Full quote from rally:

Think of that: no death tax, no estate tax, no going to the banks and borrowing from, in some cases, a fine banker. And in some cases, Shylocks and bad people.

I hate to give the guy a pass, but to be fair, I wasn't aware that was a slur (or even a word). If anything, it sounds more like a homophobic term.

Edit: yeah, actually that's a hard one to right a pass on.

[–] onslaught545@lemmy.zip 32 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

If you know the word, then you know it's a slur. His history of antisemitic statements guarantees he knew what it meant.

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

In the context of bankers and borrowing, your read is that "shylock" here refers to gay people?

[–] DahGangalang@infosec.pub 1 points 1 day ago

Edited comment weird. My original comment just had the quote from the article where Trump said he didn't know that was a slur. I replaced that quote with the full original Trump quote, with the edit (but left the original middle piece from my original comment)

[–] Cuberoot@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 1 day ago

Apparently 'Shylock' and 'shyster' are etymologically unrelated. Shylock is a Jewish moneylender from Shakespeare, and not a particularly pleasant fellow. Shyster is from the Germanic word for shit, and also used to describe a disreputable person of any race or religion.