this post was submitted on 08 Jul 2025
922 points (98.3% liked)

Comic Strips

17988 readers
1577 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] vane@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

Gradient descent - human version

[–] kameecoding@lemmy.world 68 points 21 hours ago (3 children)

I think it was a US uni campus, that redid the lawn and didn't put down any walking paths and waited for the desire paths to form and then paved those

[–] stupidcasey@lemmy.world 20 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

Proof mankind in it's natural state is truly irredeemable

[–] Gonzako@lemmy.world 5 points 5 hours ago

Nah, I like it. It clearly shows the intent of movement of people and it basically minimises trail around time.

[–] MBech 7 points 5 hours ago

It's kinda beautiful. Like an artwork perfectly depicting human nature.

[–] tamman2000@lemmy.world 13 points 19 hours ago

I was coming here to say that! It's possibly apocryphal, but the way I heard it was that the University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign did this when they did their main quad (I still remember them telling me this when I got a tour before applying there 30 years ago). And they didn't just look for where the plants were dead, but they also looked for broadleaf weeds, which sustain trampling better than grasses (it's a land grant university in the midwest. Of course there's an agriculture angle).

[–] AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net 8 points 15 hours ago

This comment section is surprisingly spicy

[–] rustydrd@sh.itjust.works 33 points 23 hours ago (3 children)

I love how the third and second to last panel are the same, as if nature paused briefly before it decided to open another path.

[–] Gsus4@mander.xyz 1 points 9 hours ago

I was finally happy...too happy...

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 8 points 21 hours ago

Human nature, not just nature.

[–] Focal@pawb.social 4 points 18 hours ago

Had to double check when I read this. Zoomed in super close, and the second to last panel actually has a veeery faint outline of a new path

[–] Fifrok@discuss.tchncs.de 84 points 1 day ago (15 children)

To everybody acting like the desire path is the problem:

  1. If the problem for you is that it's 'bad' or 'illegal', grow a spine so that when you need to break the law, for something that matters, you can do it with dry pants.
  2. If the design doesn't take into account how people will interact with it, it's bad and lazy. Only time it would be acceptable to 'force' a way to interact with something is when there are safety concerns, and there are none here.
  3. You are traped in a cage of your own making, break free or perish like the dog you are.
[–] slaacaa@lemmy.world 22 points 23 hours ago

Today, I’m astonished to learn about the existence of anti-desire path people based on the comments here

[–] Klear@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago

I wanted to say that surely nobody is complaining about desire paths and then I scrolled just a little bit... yikes!

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz 25 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

I like how upset people are in the comments. Even has random ass comments about capitalism. This is great lol

[–] REDACTED@infosec.pub 10 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

Isn't that normal on lemmy? It's also fully expected to see some comments about Israel under every post no matter how unrelated it is. People made fun of political obsession on reddit, but to me lemmy has always felt much worse in this regard

[–] Gsus4@mander.xyz 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

If you're happy with the status quo, you never left reddit.

[–] REDACTED@infosec.pub 1 points 5 hours ago

I hope it's a temporary thing, but these temporary things tend to last and multiply

[–] Trihilis@ani.social 7 points 21 hours ago

Meme successful.

[–] tias@discuss.tchncs.de 120 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (17 children)

But why is it human nature to put a bench right where people are walking. It's like people in charge get off on creating obstacles for the common man just to feel powerful.

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] Tudsamfa@lemmy.world 11 points 21 hours ago (5 children)

"desire paths" well and good, but who (above the age of 15) is jumping a hedge to save 3 second walk time? Must be next to a school.

[–] ZeffSyde@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

https://youtu.be/VoAfb3f04mo Where there's a whip, there's a way.

[–] Tonava@sopuli.xyz 1 points 6 hours ago

Where there is a will, there's a way. I've seen a desire path form through 3m (10ft) tall pine bush on a steep hillside lmao

[–] Krudler@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago

I'm 50 and in great shape. I'm squeezing between fences and leaping small barricades on my walk to get bananas at grocery. Walk life is so different than eating-while-sitting-and-driving-but-still-somehow-sweating life of cars.

[–] Uruanna@lemmy.world 13 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

I'm more concerned about the city planner who was so strongly against the idea that the path should be coming right out of that crosswalk. That's just insulting, like they WANT everyone to waste just 3 more seconds.

[–] Mustakrakish@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago

Not at forst, but when that hedge is step-overable I would

[–] TheObviousSolution@lemmy.ca 14 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

The problem is a lack of "Beware of Grass Ticks" signs.

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 7 points 20 hours ago

Beware of ticks, land mines, and bear traps.

[–] Capricorn_Geriatric@lemmy.world 39 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I love how almost every comment talks as if the pedestrians were the problem, and not designers.

Just made the footpath in box 2 the actual path, and slap additional stuff anywhere not-on-top-of-where-peiople-walk.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 21 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

My brain is so Death Stranding-coded right now that I tried to give the path a bunch of likes 👍👍👍

[–] cholesterol@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I wonder if the experience of 'shortcut' is part of the motivation, so that as soon as you've established a path, what constitutes 'shortcut' also changes. I'd be interested to know if curved paths were more desire path-resistant, because they appeal to an intuition about adjusting (and therefore optimizing) course.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ViatorOmnium@piefed.social 47 points 1 day ago

This specific case would be super predictable, notice how the desire path becomes wider at the end. Pedestrian path should always do that because that's how people walk.

load more comments
view more: next ›