this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2025
785 points (99.0% liked)

Greentext

6920 readers
911 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 3) 45 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] rumschlumpel@feddit.org 219 points 1 week ago (2 children)

That would have been the first thing I'd check ... seems standard practice.

[–] Cypher@lemmy.world 72 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Depends on the country you’re from, not an issue in Australia for example

[–] Eyekaytee@aussie.zone 47 points 1 week ago (2 children)

IKR!

seems standard practice

I was like where?? America?

Every time I come on here I just fuckin love Australia more and more

[–] Kraiden@kbin.earth 32 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Same in NZ. That would be illegal here. They can force you to take leave, or they can pay you out, but it can't just poof

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 42 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Yeah. I mean… I kinda sympathize, but yeah. Vacation days disappearing if they go unused for a year is pretty common.

Does Anon think they were the first person to come up with the extended vacation plan? If no, then wouldn’t it make sense to find out why it wasn’t more widespread?

[–] bitchkat@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

I had to take three separate 4 week vacations one year since my company was switching to a max accrual so I had to get below the mx by years end.

[–] Auth@lemmy.world 55 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Standard is for your workplace to force you to take a vacation if you build up to much. It should be illegal to remove your vacation.

[–] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 27 points 1 week ago

They can also pay it out as wage instead at the end of the year. It's the standard practice around here if you accumulate above a certain threshold. Nothing gets lost, except that you pay taxes on wages but not on vacation.

[–] NewDayRocks@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Telling you to use it or lose it is essentially forcing you.

[–] Auth@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah but theres a huge difference between being forced to use it (and still getting paid vacation) and losing it(no vacation and no pay).

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Eyekaytee@aussie.zone 15 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Vacation days disappearing if they go unused for a year is pretty common.

What?? Where?

[–] idiomaddict@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I can use them only through march of the following year in Germany

[–] Eyekaytee@aussie.zone 3 points 1 week ago

wow that sucks :O

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 7 points 1 week ago

Yeah, America. And you should love Australia. It’s getting increasingly fucked up here.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] varnia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 67 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (13 children)

Why would one need to save up vacation days to take a "full paycheck" off? That is one month, so 20 working days? 20 working days should be very common mount of available vacation days per year (at least in EU)?

[–] Schmuppes@lemmy.today 77 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The European mind cannot comprehend this.

[–] drspawndisaster@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 week ago

Flexing on us with that parenthetical statement

[–] dragonfucker@lemmy.nz 3 points 1 week ago

A full paycheck for an extended period contains many paychecks.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] LaserTurboShark69@sh.itjust.works 63 points 1 week ago (2 children)

They didn't notice getting paid out for all of their vacation days?

[–] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 124 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I'm guessing it was USA and they were just lost.

[–] Lodespawn@aussie.zone 19 points 1 week ago (5 children)

They just get lost in the UK too, most places seem pretty good about making sure you take them though.

At the first full time job I had in Oz there were a bunch of old dudes who had each accrued over a year in untaken annual leave. The company had to crack down on it and make them start taking it because it was a huge liability, both financially and as a risk to actually getting work done. They had to develop plans for them to take it a couple months at a time.

[–] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Gosh, I'm quite shocked at the UK. They are not ally pretty good for workers rights.

The worker in Australia may have accrued long service leave. It's a seperate entitlement that means younger 3 months leave at once,.on top of holiday entitlement, after working somewhere for 10 years.

[–] ForgotAboutDre@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Older contracts and union deals can be quite good in the UK. I would bet if this company doesn’t have a union that newer employees would be limited in the number of days they can transfer to the next year, likely less than a week.

[–] Lodespawn@aussie.zone 1 points 6 days ago

Yeah the company I worked for let you shift 5 but you had to take them within the first 3 months

[–] Lodespawn@aussie.zone 2 points 1 week ago

No no, this was multiple old guys and in addition to long service leave, they just never took leave.

For the UK I think the policy is in support of worker rights, in a round about kind of way. If you let people pay it out then they might never take leave and won't get the benefits of actually having had a break from work.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If I got paid out for my vacations, I would not take my vacations ever. Probably a good thing they don’t pay them out.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com 21 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Many places don't pay them out - use or lose.

[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 37 points 1 week ago (12 children)

as a heads up, if you can save enough money to take a sabbatical, you should. It was the greatest time of my fuckin' life.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] thefluffiest@feddit.nl 28 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Not fuck life. Fuck your boss

[–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

Both. Both is good.

[–] Akasazh@feddit.nl 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Not my preferred way of getting promotion

[–] thefluffiest@feddit.nl 3 points 1 week ago

But a time-honored one

[–] NochMehrG@feddit.org 12 points 1 week ago (2 children)

That’s something that isn’t even guaranteed by law in Germany. But it’s part of the contract very often (with restrictions like the company can make you take your vacation days and such). So yes, check first before you start „saving“.

[–] myotheraccount@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Afaik by law vacation days never expire in Germany, except if the employer explicitly tells you they do. So yeah, check your contract. But if the contract doesn't mention it, and you did not get a written warning, your unused vacation days are usable forever.

[–] NochMehrG@feddit.org 3 points 1 week ago

My contract explicitly states that they don’t expire. So I never had to check the law and just assumed it’s the other way round. 🙂

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›