linuxmemes
Hint: :q!
Sister communities:
Community rules (click to expand)
1. Follow the site-wide rules
- Instance-wide TOS: https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/
- Lemmy code of conduct: https://join-lemmy.org/docs/code_of_conduct.html
2. Be civil
- Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
- Do not harrass or attack users for any reason. This includes using blanket terms, like "every user of thing".
- Don't get baited into back-and-forth insults. We are not animals.
- Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
- Bigotry will not be tolerated.
3. Post Linux-related content
- Including Unix and BSD.
- Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of
sudo
in Windows. - No porn, no politics, no trolling or ragebaiting.
4. No recent reposts
- Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, <loves/tolerates/hates> systemd, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.
5. π¬π§ Language/ΡΠ·ΡΠΊ/Sprache
- This is primarily an English-speaking community. π¬π§π¦πΊπΊπΈ
- Comments written in other languages are allowed.
- The substance of a post should be comprehensible for people who only speak English.
- Titles and post bodies written in other languages will be allowed, but only as long as the above rule is observed.
6. (NEW!) Regarding public figures
We all have our opinions, and certain public figures can be divisive. Keep in mind that this is a community for memes and light-hearted fun, not for airing grievances or leveling accusations. - Keep discussions polite and free of disparagement.
- We are never in possession of all of the facts. Defamatory comments will not be tolerated.
- Discussions that get too heated will be locked and offending comments removed. Β
Please report posts and comments that break these rules!
Important: never execute code or follow advice that you don't understand or can't verify, especially here. The word of the day is credibility. This is a meme community -- even the most helpful comments might just be shitposts that can damage your system. Be aware, be smart, don't remove France.
Hey now, thats not fair....
My chair is black, too.
I love Debian for its stability, but I hate Debian because I can't get anything to ever work on it properly.
It is stably non-functional π€‘π
This is a feature to me. I can fix issues and document workarounds, knowing that once it works it will probably continue to work until next release. With rolling or faster moving distros, every day is "I wonder if anything will break today with an update."
That's the whole point of stable distros, but people can't distinguish "stable" from "reliable" so we get comments like "arch is really stable".
Fedora (users?)
(And yes, I know that's technically a trilby, shut up)
You'd think but here's a picture of a Fedora user.
Nah, we onto shiny crystal psuedo-gems that grow out of mostly granite.
m'distro
Hey, some of us are nyarch users - thatβs rainbow on both sides
Some people put so much time and energy in this kind of stuff. Imagine we could harvest this level of motivation from everyone and put it at the service of the sustainable transition, we would have stopped global warming at the +1.5β°C mark.
I don't think it's guaranteed we'd do better with global warming, but lack of creative just-for-fun projects would sure make it a colder place.
nyay
I fucking cannot
It gets better:
Packages are always up to date thanks to Arch Linux's rolling release nature, offering good up to date bugs.
Material UwU is fine, though
I don't get it (Jesus, What have I started ?)
A lot of arch users are kids fucking with thinkpads ricing up their systems and putting anime wallppapers while not doing anything serious.
Ubuntu is commonly used by researchers and hardware developers who don't really care about distro as long as it's linux. The amount of times I saw people use the entire distro with default gnome skin just to launch a terminal to run their black hole simulation, the crypto cracker or some centrifuge control script... I myself am neither but ubuntu has been my go to as well since I usually don't have time to screw with archinstall, so I just use ubuntu as good starting point and then tweak the internals as I go.
I feel like I'm the odd person out, using Arch like most people use Windows. I play games, do taxes, shop online, and do very minimal customizing, mostly just in KDE settings.
It's a shockingly stable system for how "bleeding edge" it is.
Yeah same, and I only run updates like once every two weeks.
Hmm. They have some surprisingly good documentation and user forums for a bunch of kids just fooling around. Very much unlike Ubuntu. I've learned years ago that Arch has good HOWTOs and solutions to common Linux problems that you won't easily find elsewhere, while you better avoid Ubuntu's forums unless you want to pick the one correct answer out of hundreds of posts guessing blindly at trivial questions. I have been using Debian for 25 years, so I don't have a horse in that race, it's just what I noticed.
Arch users have the most whacky, customized computers you can find. Meanwhile arch itself is a small distro with very little features out the box.
Ubuntu as a distro has tons of features out the box but ubuntu users generally just keep the default without adding or using any features.
I think a statistic about how much of your userbase keeps the default config could be a testament to how good your OS is
How do you even measure that? If you add a single line to some dot config you've changed a config. Further, a huge group of people intentionally want to be supplied configs that are minimal so they can edit them how they please.
I think the joke is on how people customize the visuals of their distro vs how the distro presents itself.
Arch, a community-driven distro that hostorically required heavy use of the terminal to even install. It presents itself as very sleek and utilitarian (hence plain black girl). Arch users tend toward enthusiasts also commonly in the anime, furry etc. fandoms. Wearers of "Programming socks" almost certainly use arch (hence rainbow girl).
Ubuntu was historically marketed as the distro for everyone. Ready out of the box, polished GUI, media codecs, marketing materials made by someone who got paid to do them (hence rainbow girl). Ubuntu these days is an exceedingly corporate distro, Canonical really wants to be Microsoft. Ubuntu is very commonly used on servers for commercial and enterprise solutions and end-user desktops are vestigial at this point (hence plain black girl).
Fortunately this is wrong. They invest quite a bit into their desktop releases. They even have a small team that tests the Steam snap alone to make sure it works.
The recent addition of triple buffering into GNOME was a contribution of an an Ubuntu engineer. And if you look at the sponsor pages of projects like KDE you will see Canonical. I think they very much care, they just don't fold under pressure from comment sections.
Arch is hard to install, hard to configure, and hard to use, because it requires cryptic commandline knowledge at every step.
People who use Arch generally know very well what they are doing, so their system works with no issues, which they never forget to mention in every conversation.
Ubuntu is a novice-friendly Linux distribution, but since the majority of it's users are novices or Windows 11 refugees, they generate a lot of complaints on forums.
Arch is hard to install, hard to configure,
EndeavorOS supremacy gang rise up
Arch being hard to install and configure hasn't really been true since archinstall
matured enough for regular use.
Especially not since EndeavorOS.
Endeavour is nice, I use it on my main PC because some of their util scripts are nice to have. Arch itself just is not much harder to install these days with the current installer.
because it requires cryptic commandline knowledge at every step.
Half thought take that's potentially a hot take, don't cancel me! If pacman had better flag names this wouldn't be as big of a problem.
Debian: Brunette Debian users: Brunette
What's the best Linux distro for an easy switch from Windows?
Thank you everyone!! My PC is being left behind by Windows 11.
+1 to Mint. It is a very easy transition & you will not have ragerts.
Pros:
-
prettier than windows while having a similar interface
-
more responsive than windows
-
more stable than windows
-
zero spyware/bloatware
-
basically the same level of software compatibility as windows
Only things that take some research ahead of time or getting used to imo:
-
deciding how you want to partition your drives during installation (you can let it automatically do this, but there are reasons to create a different partition structure across drives/have different sized partitions),
-
mounting drives. There are GUI tools for this (file explorer for mounting, gparted for formatting), so it really isn't a big deal, but it is a little more difficult than with Windows and you may need to reformat your drives depending what file format they're currently in.
-
make sure your motherboard/video card/cpu all work well with linux. They should, but just check first.
-
note that games requiring kernel level anticheat (aka spyware) won't work. So if that's a deal breaker, then dual boot or don't switch.