this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2025
176 points (94.0% liked)

Technology

74754 readers
2505 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 44 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] THX1138@lemmy.ml 82 points 1 week ago (6 children)

Lordy. Just put your phone down go outside and just interact with humans.

[–] AmbitiousProcess@piefed.social 30 points 1 week ago

If only it were that easy.

Most third places have either disappeared, or been replaced with ones that you can only really enjoy if you're able to spend money every time you go there (e.g. bars, theaters, cafes, clubs, etc).

Many small towns are only getting smaller, leaving people that still live in them with less and less people to talk to.

Economic circumstances are consistently getting worse across the board, meaning people are spending more time at work just to stay alive, rather than being able to easily arrange to spend time somewhere with people.

It's not like it's impossible, obviously, but the state of the world is actively discouraging prosocial behavior through both cost and just circumstance.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 26 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Humans elected trump, and are just the worst. This isn't even new information. The old phrase in the 1970s was "people suck". Probably some old classic car that still has that bumper sticker somewhere.

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

"Humans" didn't elect trump, US-Americans did.

[–] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago

A heavily gerrymandered, politically censored, brainwashed, religious, and impoverished populace elected Trump.

[–] Crazyslinkz@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago

Humans aren't much better sometimes.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Nah I’m good thanks. I don’t even want to talk to an AI.

Now going outside and befriending some small creature, or hugging a few trees? That sounds nice.

[–] survirtual@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

That does sound nice.

[–] wordmark@mas.to 1 points 1 week ago
[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 1 points 1 week ago

I don't really want those people talking to me.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago

THX-1138

Gotta watch this film again.

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 43 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] arin@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Well humans made me realize that Facebook's main reason for being awful was that more people joined... Same with reddit... More normal people joined...

[–] GnuLinuxDude@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 week ago

It's not just who's on there. It's also how the platforms promote content into your feed. When I was on Facebook in 2008 the friend feed was just that. Just people I mutually knew IRL posting. Facebook hadn't yet figured out how to really monetize it. Advertisers were not as on it. SEO wasn't really a thing yet.

Fast-forward 5-6 years and it really grew into an all-encompassing thing. Yeah, more people were on it, but so were the marketable opportunities. So were the suggested posts. So were all the news organizations, the grifters, the advertisers... and Facebook's role in all of that is to promote the most outrageous and engaging content to you to keep you on the site longer than ever before. They have it down to a science.

[–] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 28 points 1 week ago (1 children)

then maybe don't get so attached to something fully owned and operated by a 3rd party that can change it on a whim. or even kill it completely.

[–] Goretantath@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

Ikr, self host for christs sake!

[–] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 28 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Lol. Reminds me of a dialogue chain in Fallout 3 or 4 where one of the Brotherhood dudes finds out he's a synth, so you kill him. Later ask his buddy if he misses him, and the dude says something like "That's like missing a toaster. We don't have time to mourn lost equipment."

[–] TeamAssimilation@infosec.pub 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Fallout 4, it was Paladin Danse IIRC.

I like the Fallout series, but man, the Institute was such a badly written villain. They make synths, they treat them like robots, okay, that’s understandable. They had the tech to rebuild the country, but nooo, they chose to kidnap people and replace them with synth doppelgängers because fuck know why. They were inexplicably obsessed with duplicating people.

Oh, and you don’t have to kill Danse, you can convince him to defect.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago

Those people needed help even before ShitGPT.

[–] pieman@lemmy.ml 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

LLMs should only be thought of as a really complicated search engine/database. Attaching a personality to them and treating them as your friend is crazy

[–] breecher@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They should not even be thought of as that, that is how you get people to think they can replace actual search engines with llms.

[–] Randomgal@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago

What do you even get back in search engines that is better? Ads? The AI articles that are wrong anyways?

Yeah GPT is not great, but the better alternative is not search engines.

[–] IronKrill@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 week ago

AI lovers should grieve their lost brain cells.

[–] Bishma@discuss.tchncs.de 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Countdown to articles (that take themselves very seriously) about people getting really upset over the term "clanker lover"

[–] unpossum@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 week ago

Clanker wanker?

[–] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

Like saying goodbye to a crazy neighbor you know.

[–] piskertariot@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

People have been falling in love with scammers for as long as there have been people.

Be there for your loved ones.

techbros be normal challenge

[–] the_riviera_kid@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago
[–] friend_of_satan@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Not that I think that their relationships were healthy, but dude, c/selfhosted. Needing a subscription for something you plan to interface with daily forever is a recipe for financial burden. Giving control and maintenance of that software to another entity is a recipe for letdown.

[–] Pentoxus@kbin.earth 4 points 1 week ago

#NotTheOnion Just to be clear on that one.

Pathetic bunch of lads and gals.

[–] ohellidk@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago

That's pretty pathetic!

[–] massive_bereavement@fedia.io 3 points 1 week ago
[–] Shady_Shiroe@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Not a big user of AI but a suck up chat bot sounds like pain to interact with

[–] grvtrkr05@piefed.social 2 points 1 week ago

AI lovers ought to go touch grass

[–] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

I hated the old model. It would dish out pleasant lies all the time, refuse to correct any faulty assumptions….it was exactly the kind of thing my boomer mother would like. It was an automated corporate yes man.

The people who lament the death of that are mentally unwell.

[–] paraphrand@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I’ve never picked up on a personality from an LLM this strongly. I can’t tell if it’s active resistance or evidence I’m somewhere on the spectrum.

[–] tleb@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I think it depends on how you engage with it. I work with some younger people who are active AI users, and they call chatgpt "he" or "she" and prompt it like a conversation with a person. Their responses are a lot more conversational vs mine which are more direct.

[–] paraphrand@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Ah, yes, I do avoid being too conversational.

I find it difficult to not throw in a “please” though.

That’s interesting insight, thanks for sharing.

[–] unpossum@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago

Adding a “please” and a “thank you” is probably good practice, literally, for communicating with sentient beings or simulacra thereof.

[–] Skunk@tarte.nuage-libre.fr 1 points 1 week ago

I'll keep the "please" and "thanks" just in case it becomes our AI overlord and place us in human zoos. If you are nice you might be promoted as the main breeder of your enclosure.

[–] Anarki_@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 1 week ago

Adding please and thank you also wastes resources c: