this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2025
286 points (99.3% liked)

News

31889 readers
3032 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Members of the Department of Government Efficiency uploaded a copy of a crucial Social Security database in June to a vulnerable cloud server, putting the personal information of hundreds of millions of Americans at risk of being leaked or hacked, according to a whistle-blower complaint filed by the Social Security Administration’s chief data officer.

The database contains records of all Social Security numbers issued by the federal government. It includes individuals’ full names, addresses and birth dates, among other details that could be used to steal their identities, making it one of the nation’s most sensitive repositories of personal information

top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 4 points 1 hour ago

In the end was it Elon who sold it to Russians or Trump?

[–] Auk@lemmy.world 11 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

🇷🇺 🇷🇺 🇷🇺

[–] SGGeorwell@lemmy.world 39 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

I’ve been wondering for a long time if we could just get new social security numbers anyway. Now this.

[–] logicbomb@lemmy.world 26 points 11 hours ago

At the very least be sparse and difficult to guess.

Our current SSNs were never meant to be used as identification, so they made them easy to create and easy to guess.

[–] finitebanjo@piefed.world 7 points 11 hours ago

How about you don't and also everyone's grandparents gets scammed for every cent sending them into homelessness?

[–] don@lemmy.ca 13 points 10 hours ago

Republicans: this is exactly what we voted for! 🖕😤

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 10 points 10 hours ago

👊🇺🇸🔥

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 17 points 11 hours ago
[–] LostWanderer@fedia.io 19 points 12 hours ago

Great, America was already fucked...Without a competent leader in office to handle a disaster of this scale, we'll be worse off. Social Security Numbers were always a bad idea to keep around for the long term, and worse to be used by businesses to validate the identity of a customer/employee. A photo ID should've been solely used to identify one's self. It's going to be a rough generation for everyone. 😬

[–] WatDabney@sopuli.xyz 10 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (3 children)

Behind the password "SuperHacker123"

[–] abbadon420@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

I think you mean "Maga2020"? Same as last time.

[–] Steve@startrek.website 4 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

************** is not a secure password

[–] meco03211@lemmy.world 9 points 10 hours ago

Hunter2 seems like a great password.

[–] Lembot_0004@discuss.online 2 points 11 hours ago

Password? Oh, password. Yes, very secure password...