this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2025
335 points (95.4% liked)

News

31990 readers
3096 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The announcement follows Newsom’s 2024 executive order, which directed encampment cleanups after a U.S. Supreme Court ruling granted state and local governments more authority to remove them.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Smoogs@lemmy.world 23 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

The governor’s office stated that the task force will prioritize sites deemed unsafe and collaborate with local governments to connect individuals with shelter, health care and substance use services.

So much is not covered in rage bait titles.

this is the same tactic that got us trump this second time.

[–] FlyingCircus@lemmy.world 14 points 3 days ago (4 children)

When all encampments are deemed unsafe and local services are already stretched to the breaking point, I think we can be justified in calling this out for the performative anti-homeless bullshit it is.

Nothing short of a complete reorganization of the economy so that working class people are prioritized instead of billionaires will fix this problem though.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 13 points 3 days ago

as described, it doesn't seem as bad as the title

but we all know the reality will not be as it is described

[–] CaptDust@sh.itjust.works 169 points 4 days ago (5 children)

Dude's really method acting his trump "parody" isn't he.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 59 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Maybe he can send trans people to gulags too. After all, Newsom's message seems to be "Hey, I heard you like fascists... vote for me! I can do a fascism too!"

Experience has shown that trying to out-fascist the fascists always works really well for centrists. Anything but the compassionate, progressive politics people desperately want.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 30 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Here's hoping that AOC or some other progressive wins the white house. Newsom, while better than Trump, is still shit.

As for Cali, I am hoping for Katie Porter or likeminded folk to take leadership when Newsom vacates his office. The homeless and everybody else needs help from someone who genuinely gives a damn.

[–] DrunkEngineer@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Again with the zombie myth that Katie Porter is a progressive. She is even worse than Newsom.

[–] mlg@lemmy.world 14 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Would bet cash money the DNC selects- I mean uh he fairly wins the DNC primary for next election cycle lol.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

As though he hasn't already been selected.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Deflated0ne@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago

Bluemaga won't care. We told yall this is who he is. Immiserating the homeless is what he does for fun.

[–] Zugyuk@lemmy.world 35 points 4 days ago (20 children)

... by making affordable housing and giving it to the needy?

load more comments (20 replies)
[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 89 points 4 days ago (10 children)

And where do you plan to have them go? Because they have to go somewhere. Perhaps instead of fighting a symptom you treat the cause. Like a complete lack of affordable housing. And things like corporations and hedge funds hoarding single family homes that sit empty, often not even on the market because they're treating them as appreciating assets not homes.

[–] j_elgato@leminal.space 29 points 4 days ago (7 children)

In order to actually address the homeless crisis, we would first have to fix U.S. Healthcare.

Or we could leave everything broken, with the wealth still being transferred upwards, and keep funneling the people that have been ground up and spit out into our growing for-profit prison industry...

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] MangioneDontMiss@lemmy.ca 27 points 4 days ago (2 children)

someone should pose that question to the red states that literally ship their homeless to california and then call CA a shithole for having a homelessness problem.

[–] Taldan@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago

Texas has actually started reforming zoning laws to allow for more housing, as much of a shithole as that state can be otherwise

Housing is an area that California has absolutely failed on, and it doesn't look like Newsome will do anything to fix it

Reform zoning laws. Allow more dense housing to be built. Once housing is fixed, homelessness will follow suit

[–] Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone 10 points 3 days ago (2 children)

The vast majority of Californian homeless people become homeless in California. Some people do come here from out of state, but it’s around 10% of the total homeless population. 75% of homeless Californians even live in the same county they became homeless in.

California doesn’t have a ton of homeless people because everyone else is bussing homeless people here, it’s because it’s expensive as fuck (both rent and home prices).

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] sartalon@lemmy.world 20 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I loved that they let a ton of people out of jail when they legalized marijuana and vacated a ton of convictions.

But then they literally just turned people out on the street with zero fucking pathways. No money, no home, no phone, just zero fucking resources.

It was an almost overnight explosion of homelessness in San Diego.

Sure they have always had a homeless population (the weather is particularly ideal for living outside most of the year), but nothing like it turned in to.

Clearing camps won't help. Like you said, you need to solve the root problem.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] j_roby@slrpnk.net 86 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Encampment sweeps kill.

https://www.propublica.org/article/portland-homeless-deaths-multnomah-county

But although the city spent roughly $200,000 per homeless resident throughout that time, deaths of homeless people recorded in the county quadrupled, climbing from 113 in 2019 to more than 450 in 2023, according to the most recent data from the Multnomah County Health Department. The rise in deaths far outpaces the growth in the homeless population, which was recorded at 6,300 by a 2023 county census, a number most agree is an undercount...

These deaths came during the same period that Portland began a two-pronged response to public pressure over homelessness. City leaders began moving homeless people out of public view by removing tents at a rate far surpassing those of its West Coast peers. Since 2021, it carried out 19,000 sweeps, and it dismantled over 20 encampments per day in 2024, according to city records.

At the same time, the city reduced money for stable permanent housing while dramatically increasing its investment in temporary shelters...

[–] nickiwest@lemmy.world 19 points 4 days ago (1 children)

How is a city spending $200k per homeless resident and still not providing them with housing?

That's more than 8 years' worth of rent/mortgage at $2k per month. And even longer in a more reasonably-priced home.

I understand there are more expenses than just rent, but I also understand that it's nearly impossible to get a job if you don't have a permanent residence. If we've got a homelessness crisis that includes working families, why wouldn't the states want to help those families?

A rent/mortgage assistance program seems like it would do a lot more long-term good than simply "cleaning up" encampments.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 18 points 3 days ago (8 children)

Jesus fuckin Christ. Fuck you, you goddam scumbag.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] kbobabob@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 3 days ago

I wish they said how long people lived there before becoming homeless.

Ninety percent of participants became homeless in California, having been last housed in the state.

This means someone could have moved there there and been housed for a period of time before not being able to make ends meet.

There's also this at the end though..

Two-thirds (66%) were born in California.

So it seems it's still a mostly local issue.

[–] GroundedGator@lemmy.world 28 points 4 days ago (5 children)

200M spent on alligator Auschwitz and an estimated 450M annual operating cost.

Some googling tells me that an apartment building can cost about 200k/unit (I suspect it could be less). That's 1000 units. And then imagine what would happen if you put that yearly operating cost into healthcare and other social programs.

They want to build 1000 concentration camps. Florida is working on their second. Texas has one. Other states will certainly follow.

Maybe Newsom should be building homes instead of division.

load more comments (5 replies)

Fuck Gavin Newsom. The dude is scum. All the people blowing him are the worst

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 57 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (14 children)

Where did all the newsom stans go?

EDIT: the number of downvotes is the number of people who agree with performative cruelty to homeless people.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] AcidiclyBasicGlitch@sh.itjust.works 16 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

This sounds an awful lot like Louisiana...

Relocation begins: Jeff Landry's administration clears New Orleans homeless encampments

Louisiana coerced unhoused people into an unheated warehouse – and paid $17.5m for it

It started out as needing to clear everyone out allegedly for security reasons bc of the Bourbon street attacks and the Superbowl, but everyone assumed he was trying to just slap a coat of paint on the city. Then it happened again when there was a big Taylor Swift concert, now it's like every time "we have company" we should just understand Landry will be rounding up homeless people to make the city more presentable.

People keep saying Newsome is just doing this kind of shit to prove he's a centrist Democrat but I'm kinda starting to worry it might be a little more sinister than that.

Word of advice for California, be very cautious about allowing any state police or task force to permanently or semi permanently set up in your cities. If it gets proposed push back as loud and hard as you legally can, no matter what you local government might indicate about it.

Homeless sweep ahead of Taylor Swift concert reveals conflict between city, Troop NOLA

Troop NOLA: What we know about the new Louisiana State Police troop in New Orleans

Mayor LaToya Cantrell 'in alignment' with Gov. Jeff Landry's crime plan for New Orleans

And if you can't stop it from happening make sure your city hammers out even the most obscure details in a contract. If you're not sure if you need to bother with getting it in writing, you do.

New Orleans council member pushes city to ~~enter agreement~~ get written agreement on homeless sweeps with State Police

I changed the original headline bc it's misleading. It makes it sound like the contract was something city council wanted bc they wanted homeless sweeps. The city pushed for a formal contract bc State police were just doing it without any say from the city on how they rounded people up or where they took them.

[–] SeeMarkFly@lemmy.ml 52 points 4 days ago (3 children)

While many people believe that substance use, mental illness, or other individual factors are the main drivers of homelessness, extensive research shows that rising housing costs drive more people into homelessness than any other cause.

https://publichealth.jhu.edu/2025/we-can-end-homelessness-in-america

[–] rozodru@piefed.social 21 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I'm in Canada, Toronto specifically and the Homeless situation here is just as bad as it is in the US. I do volunteer work for a couple homeless outreach programs and I'd say easily since the pandemic the homeless demographic has drastically changed.

The stereotype that homeless people are junkies or mentally ill has shattered. The people I'm working with now are, for now, mentally fit and sober. More women than ever, more elderly, more minorities that in the past generally didn't have many homeless within them because their communities would help prevent them from being homeless i.e. Asians, Muslims, etc

So. Many. Have jobs. So many have families, children, and they are sleeping rough so that they can simply afford to have their kids or older parents or other family members continue to live with whatever roof they can afford over their heads. There are SO many that are sleeping rough because there is simply no room for them to sleep in the tiny studio apartment they can barely afford with their kids, wives, parents, whatever.

I'm handing out food to people who dont' even look homeless. They can't afford to BUY FOOD. All their money goes to rent or other important bills. I'm dealing with people who were on drugs and alchol who then got sober in hopes to get off the streets and find work only to relapse because there is no work or what work they can get isn't anywhere near enough to get them off the streets so they slump RIGHT BACK into that hole because, and they've told me first hand, "There's no point."

Lines are getting longer every month, The portions for food and other things we hand out are getting smaller because NO ONE can afford to donate ANYTHING anymore anywhere near the amount we need to cover the increasingly rising population we're working with.

And none of the politicians could give a flying fuck. None of them. Regardless of what side of the fence they're on and how far away from said fence they are. We could have fixed this years ago, decades ago, but we chose profits over people. We made this bed a long time ago, It's almost your turn to get into it.

For us volunteers this is no longer a battle we're fighting in hopes of winning. No, at this point we've lost. Now we're just hoping we have enough bandages to slow the bleeding as much as possible before we run out.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Assassassin@lemmy.world 57 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Newsome is such a two faced piece of shit.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] roguetrick@lemmy.world 41 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

Behold the sparkle of champagne.
The crime rate's gone, feel free again.
Oh, life's a breeze with you, Miss Lily White.
Taylor Swifts on the screen today.
Convinced the liberals it's okay.
So let's get dressed to dance away the night.

While they kill, kill, kill, kill, kill the poor.
Kill, kill, kill, kill, kill the poor.
Kill, kill, kill, kill, kill the poor tonight.
Kill, kill, kill, kill, kill the poor.
Kill, kill, kill, kill, kill the poor.
Kill, kill, kill, kill, kill the poor tonight.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Resonosity@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 3 days ago (16 children)

Fuck Newsom for this, and all his regressive vetoes against laws throughout his tenure as governor to help fix this issue.

load more comments (16 replies)
[–] FoxyFerengi@startrek.website 37 points 4 days ago (24 children)

I was speaking with an older lady about who could be as energizing for the left as Bernie for the next election, I said AOC and maybe Jasmine Crockett on the same ticket. (which is a pipe dream, I'm sure)

Anyway, she said Gavin Newsom, and didn't believe me when I said he's a centrist. And I couldn't understand why she even felt he's a leftist. He must have some good pr somewhere that I'm not looking lol

load more comments (24 replies)
[–] Archr@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

It seems like this is a bit of a political move. I understand that the article mentions connecting the homeless that are cleared with the local support structure. But it gives no mention of how those support structures will be improved. No additional funding or infrastructure provided.

From what I understand the local support structures are already at capacity and generally shelters are still unsafe (especially for women).

This is either coming from Newsome not understanding the issue at best. And a political move that will just cause more suffering at worst.

load more comments
view more: next ›