this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2025
124 points (99.2% liked)

Global News

5031 readers
279 users here now

What is global news?

Something that happened or was uncovered recently anywhere in the world. It doesn't have to have global implications. Just has to be informative in some way.


Post guidelines

Title formatPost title should mirror the news source title.
URL formatPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
[Opinion] prefixOpinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.
Country prefixCountry prefix can be added to the title with a separator (|, :, etc.) where title is not clear enough from which country the news is coming from.


Rules

This community is moderated in accordance with the principles outlined in Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which emphasizes the right to freedom of opinion and expression. In addition to this foundational principle, we have some additional rules to ensure a respectful and constructive environment for all users.

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. No social media postsAvoid all social media posts. Try searching for a source that has a written article or transcription on the subject.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

Icon generated via LLM model | Banner attribution


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The Trump administration announced Friday that H-1B visas will now come with a $100,000 annual fee, but the White House says it will only apply to new visa applicants.

Archived version: https://archive.is/20250920192927/https://www.politico.com/news/2025/09/20/donald-trump-h1b-visas-overhaul-00574345


Disclaimer: The article linked is from a single source with a single perspective. Make sure to cross-check information against multiple sources to get a comprehensive view on the situation.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] fox2263@lemmy.world 45 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

So after the Hyundai-LG plant raid he tweeted it was a mistake and that he needed skilled engineers for company’s building in the US. That they’re very important.

Then announces that those same engineers will need to pay 100k to get in.

Slow-clap for his brilliance.

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 32 points 2 weeks ago

He's a Russian asset with dementia, shepherded by a mentally ill, psychopathic, Christian Taliban.

This is the best they can do. Either way, Ji and Putin win.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

Trump isn't making these calls play-by-play. He set ICE loose with a quota. Shit happens. "Not like that!" His handlers are scrambling to contain the nonsense. Don't expect it to make sense.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 1 points 2 weeks ago

i think those engineers from korea uses a different visa? korea already kinda relented to trumps demands.

[–] fodor@lemmy.zip 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I think you're slightly misstating things. Those engineers will not pay 100K, it makes no sense at all. A potential employer could pay, but there's no chance an employee would.

[–] fox2263@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

I’m sure the employers definitely will

[–] Pat_Riot@lemmy.today 26 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

This doesn't just affect corporations, it will also severely impact universities who hire professors and lecturers from all over the world on this type of visa. Schools are not going to be able to afford this, further eroding the quality of higher education in the US.

[–] Benaaasaaas@group.lt 14 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Aren't US universities paying millions of dollars for their football coaches and stadiums? They can afford it, of course doesn't mean they will.

[–] DancingBear@midwest.social 4 points 2 weeks ago

There are donors who donate to the sports teams and donors who donate to the academic side etc it’s different money the institutions have to keep separate

[–] smh@slrpnk.net 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Mine sure isn't. We were having funding problems before the pandemic.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 2 points 2 weeks ago

so did ours state university system in the west coast, apparently they had been suffering from enrollment issue for years(covid just made it worst because people dint learn anything by being only on online classes, plus almost no job prospects after graduations), last i read on latest news is they are enticing HS to enroll early, if they complete certain requirements(so guaranteed seats in the state uni), its a bandaid. Cant say the same for the University or UC system(which i heard is not affected for the moment.

and pre-pandemic , people were already not happy with how little they got out of thier university(wet lab experience, x experience)

[–] Pat_Riot@lemmy.today 1 points 2 weeks ago

It's not as simple as that. Where money comes from and goes to are complicated enough, but paying $100k sponsorship, per year, per person hired from abroad would be just like adding that sum to their payroll, and that would monkey wrench the gears spectacularly.

[–] TacoButtPlug@sh.itjust.works 17 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I hope this cripples the companies that backed MAGA. Unfortunately, it'll put small businesses out completely though.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

usually its tech that will likely have to choose between offshoring thier employees or hire domestically. they will choose the former rather than latter, because its cheaper.

[–] Dragonstaff@leminal.space 2 points 2 weeks ago

It's a shakedown.Put a couple million in the "Trump Presidential Library" and you get the workers your business needs.

[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 14 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

And will corporations learn that Republicans are as bad for business as they are for civil rights, human rights, natural rights, and any other kind of right?

No. They will not. Because a handful of multibillionaires own and control all the corporations.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 5 points 2 weeks ago

they also control most if not all of the MSM and social media as a propaganda arm of conservatives.

[–] hector@lemmy.today 10 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

These visas are used to depress wages. They pay these guest workers less, and can get them deported at the drop of a hat. This might not be that bad of a thing.

[–] Katana314@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I was going to say this too; a rare one of Trump’s policies that seems workable.

There’s supposed to be a rule where H1B permits first require the company to exhaust national hires; but they do this by simply inventing qualifications no one can fill. I don’t know how you can fix that part, but a price tag is good friction.

Still, this leads to trouble for the industries where we really don’t have any local talent. I want to say the federal government could approve exemptions ad hoc, but I doubt anyone would trust them to control that.

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

Is it not obvious this is just another shake down!?

[–] cornshark@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

I think you're thinking of the PERM labour test, which is for green card, not H1B.

[–] for_some_delta@beehaw.org 4 points 2 weeks ago

Layoffs are happening. Job numbers were overstated by 911,000. Let's fix the job market by removing 85,000 workers.

Employers seem to hate wage labor. I look forward to a future where workers keep work done.

[–] GaMEChld@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I actually had this idea myself, with the idea being that corporations should basically pay a tax for H1B if they are going to keep hiring H1B over domestic workers. However, my idea was tied to hours worked, so they can't exploit them with unfair workloads.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

if they restrict h1b visas, nothing stopping them from solely hiring Indians in INDIA without having them move to the US, so no visa needed, thereby circumventing the visas. they probably will hire domestically, mostly senior or "x amount experience" so they can keep things from falling apart or training the overseas team.

[–] czardestructo@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Tax the offshore engineering and R&D, too. My company plays both these cards with a China office to hire local, cheaper talent plus manufacturing is local so they help domestically on their side. Thats a win. Then they hire tons of Indian H1B for engineering in America.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 weeks ago

That's way harder to track. Immigration and visas already have processes in place and people watching. It's very easy to track where money is going.

when you're paying for offshore engineering, it's just some money moving around.

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago

This is all about the grift. It is just another way to force businesses to come groveling to this administration. More corruption and bribes will ensue with exceptions for those who play ball.

[–] Evotech@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

I love small government

load more comments
view more: next ›