this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2025
16 points (94.4% liked)

Asklemmy

50783 readers
610 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I'm a big UFC fan so Saudi Arabia being involved in my media is nothing new. That said, it seems fairly hypocritical for alot of the outspoken comics to participate. Opinions?

top 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] turkalino@lemmy.yachts 6 points 10 hours ago

I have an opinion about Bill Burr in particular. I was a faithful listener of his podcast for many years but I stopped a couple months ago because it was getting extremely repetitive. Every episode, he would go on the same rant about how billionaires are the source of most of America’s problems - which is something I wholeheartedly agree with, but I listened to his podcast for a brief comedic escape from the world, not for the same political discussions that pop up everywhere else.

So when I heard he accepted a direct payment of a huge sum of money from the very people he’s constantly argued are the #1 enemies, I felt surprised and betrayed. I just don’t believe he’s in a position to take the “soft power” stance when he’s receiving money from the very royal family that’s the cause of so many human rights issues in that country. Not gonna be supporting any of his work anymore.

[–] sanguinepar@lemmy.world 36 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

I think any comedian who takes part loses all rights to ever complain about freedom of speech, or cancel culture, or whatever. Since they likely won't have been kidnapped and murdered by bone saw.

[–] Chippys_mittens@lemmy.world 19 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

I tend to agree with this stance. Particularly hypocritical of one of my top 5 favorites Bill Burr.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 19 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Money counting machine go Burrrrr.

[–] Chippys_mittens@lemmy.world 12 points 22 hours ago

It, unfortunately, does go burrrrr

[–] Fyrnyx@kbin.melroy.org 7 points 17 hours ago

I'm just sick of the Saudis forcing their way into everything just because they have lots of money and oil reserves to do it with.

They've recently acquired EA. They have a WrestleMania being hosted in their capital. They're having the 2027 Olympics hosted there. And now this.

It's like we're all catering to this idea to humanize a country that has a history of religious extremism, extreme misogyny and absolute corruption. It won't change a thing.

[–] chosensilence@pawb.social 16 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

yes, very. Louis CK tried to make a nuanced argument about how even people suffering should be given art, and by being there he was demonstrating that this kind of world exists. sounds reasonable until you realize that he is doing all of that in service of fascists. he is not performing for "the people." he is not providing art or creativity to the group that stands to benefit from it the most, he is giving it to those who already own everything. this wasn't organized by some sort of grassroots campaign of Saudi Arabian comedians; this was for royalty. he was entertaining leaders of one of the most oppressive countries in the world, allowing them to delude him with propaganda, and was shielded from the everyday life of the real people they subjugate, enslave, and kill. fuck him.

[–] Fyrnyx@kbin.melroy.org 1 points 4 hours ago

Louis CK has stopped being funny for quite a long while.

I'm starting to get it now, entertainment acts and sports vendors go to Saudi when they're on their last legs of relevance. It's where they've spent their last remnant of dignity for themselves, so they go blow it trying to appease some fascist dictator of an oppressive country. Like way to go /s

[–] noxypaws@pawb.social 18 points 21 hours ago

Fuck anything and everything related to the Saudis, the deranged psychopaths who, for starters, assassinated Jamal Khashoggi and dismembered his corpse.

Fuck every single one of those comedians.

[–] Vanth@reddthat.com 8 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I think it's really difficult to completely avoid any sort of financial ties with companies or countries that are human rights abusers. I think we need to extend a lot of grace to people who try to continuously improve.

But when it's widely known beforehand what accepting a paycheck to perform for a country like this means, but they decide to accept that big paycheck anyway, I think they deserve all the social backlash they get.

If some performer said that about my country, "no thanks, I won't perform in the US , whose government is helping fund genocides", then I would cheer for them for standing on their principles. I wish we saw more of that.

[–] Chippys_mittens@lemmy.world 3 points 21 hours ago

I agree with everything you've said.

[–] WhatGodIsMadeOf@feddit.org 6 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

I think as an American I already participate in the dark evil side of humanity.

[–] Chippys_mittens@lemmy.world 3 points 22 hours ago

Just by being alive in the country ?

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 3 points 21 hours ago

Not really. So much shit going on its hard to care about it.

[–] StoneyPicton@lemmy.ca 2 points 20 hours ago

Chasing a buck is not a crime. If your government places specific sanctions to represent disapproval of a country then it can be. Ultimately there are people that care enough to remember these comedians transgressions and remind the world as appropriate. Chase a buck if you want but every action someone takes can have unforseen consequences. Time will tell.

[–] Samsuma@lemmy.ml -5 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

I find it funny when Westerners suddenly pretend to care about human rights when bougies visit a Western client state but crickets will chirp when they visit literal settler-colonies like the U.S., Australia, New Zealand, Canada, or when they visit countries that continue to have colonies today like Denmark, France, the U.K., or when they visit countries that gave birth or provided/continue to provide human capital to the Euroanglo-Zionazi Entity like... basically the entirety of the Global North.

[–] Chippys_mittens@lemmy.world 7 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

So, what, Ideally, should happen to "settler-colonies" like the US, Australia and New Zeland. Because human rights violations happen in one place doesnt excuse them happening in another. They can all be bad...

[–] Samsuma@lemmy.ml 2 points 10 hours ago

Landback is part of the fine variety of solutions that can be effectuated. Also, is there any doubt that the US, Australia and New Zealand are settler-colonies that it prompts enclosing with quotation marks? Could you expand on that?

And sure, yeah human rights violations happening in one place or the other is "all bad", then pray tell, why is it that the manufactured outrage is reserved specifically for WANA countries, but not for the imperial West that don't exactly have a great track record on human rights, even worse than WANA combined?