this post was submitted on 08 Oct 2025
359 points (98.6% liked)

politics

25986 readers
2330 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 3 points 6 hours ago

Why do they not drag Trump away in a straightjacket?

[–] spicehoarder@lemmy.zip 7 points 16 hours ago

Do none of them understand that their bribe money is pointless if it's printed in a currency nobody will accept in the next 5-10 years?

I liked it when everyone thought he was dead. That was a great time.

[–] criss_cross@lemmy.world 98 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I liked things better when I didn’t have to worry about masked men in unmarked cars abducting people off the street based on their skin color.

And for those thinking “no that’s not what’s happening at all!” It 100% is

https://old.reddit.com/r/chicago/comments/1o0qsb8/getting_chased_for_being_brown/

Shoutouts to the the fucking masked videographer. Jesus Christ.

[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If it hasn’t happened already, skin color soon won’t be the only criteria.

[–] evenglow@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It already happened years ago. This isn't the first time protesters were kidnapped and stuffed in rental vans while Trump is President.

[–] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 day ago

it's easier to pick a time when it didn't happen in the USA

[–] Ferrous@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Shoutouts to the the fucking masked videographer.

Some commenters in the thread you linked are claiming that the videographer was working for ICE for a promotional video.

[–] TheBlindPew@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 day ago

You can see in the video that he climbs out of the same red van as the ICE thugs, so that seems like a solid bet to me

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

How much time did Donald serve for his 34 felonies?

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 3 points 6 hours ago

At least Hitler served time for his attempted coup

[–] ShellMonkey@piefed.socdojo.com 101 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io 43 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] meco03211@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

Morning dementrum? Demantrum? We can workshop this.

[–] maxwebster93@lemmy.zip 18 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The fall of America is happening in real time. It’s a shame their politicians stand by and let it happen. Trump, Vance, Bondi, Hegseth, Noem, Patel, Kennedy, are all terrible human beings. And don’t get started on Leavitt. Why nothing is done to remove each and every one of them from office is mind boggling from anyone outside of the USA. It will take decades to have any semblance of democracy return for their citizens.

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 hours ago

"Trump, Vance, Bondi, Hegseth, Noem, Patel, Kennedy"

Ooh, people who should be arrested!

[–] Tryenjer@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

They're already at the stage of demanding the arrest of political opponents. How time flies!

[–] DrFistington@lemmy.world 73 points 1 day ago (15 children)

The minute JB removes protections for federal agents from ICE, DHS, and the FBI, and declares them guilty of state level treason, and is willing to deputize people to go after them, I'll be more than happy to assist

[–] foodandart@lemmy.zip 28 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Unfortunately, the violence directed at them is what many on the right and even Trump himself want, because it will be used as a pretext to interfere in the mid-term elections coming in 2026.

I mean, they're going to try anyhow, and stirring up shit will just give them that much more leverage to do so.

As rage-inducing as Trump is, just biding ones time and voting and getting everyone you know to vote in the mid-terms for the Democrats - even if the candidate is an absolute stinker - is what is needed to put the brakes onto this administration.

[–] krashmo@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago (3 children)

getting everyone you know to vote in the mid-terms for the Democrats - even if the candidate is an absolute stinker - is what is needed to put the brakes onto this administration.

We did that for Biden already. The Dems had 4 years to do something, anything, of significance to protect democracy and what did we get? The most feeble attempt at legal charades that I've ever seen. They ran out the clock and let Trump cancel the only real investigations into his own behavior.

Yes, Democrats are clearly better than Republicans but those limp-dicked cowards are not going to save us. Many of them can barely muster the courage to condemn what's happening now, much less convince anyone that they actually want to stop it.

[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Who said they were going to save us? We have to save ourselves. The reason we vote for stinker Dems is to get more time to establish our own salvation.

[–] krashmo@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Maybe that's what you mean but I don't get the impression that's what most people mean when they say that voting for Dems is the answer. They want some external force to do the work for them. They don't want to be directly involved any more than checking a box every couple of years.

[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

If we're just talking general population, then yeah most people just wanna check a box and not think about it. If you're talking about the people actually advocating voting Dem, I think my perspective is much more representative.

Who is out there saying that the Dems are great and we need to vote for them because they're actively good? The vast majority of people I see advocating Dems are very candid about it being a harm reduction strategy. It seems weird to assume that "most people" mean the opposite of what I see them actually saying.

I'm much more worried about the people finding idealistic reasons to criticize harm reduction strategies.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Tryenjer@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

There's no salvation. The US isn't functional anymore.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It WILL be a Democrat or a Republican group holding power in Washington. You can pretend it won't be but it will be. It has been that way for untold decades. You cannot and will not change that.

So you either don't accept this reliable truth. Or you want Republicans in charge. Which is it?

[–] krashmo@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (7 children)

I never said it would be anyone else in power. I said Democrats are not going to fix this problem. Those two things are not equivalent in any way.

Still, if you want to take this conversation in a totally different direction I'll play along. if you base future decisions on past outcomes you're only guaranteeing that change cannot occur. People said exactly what you just did about the divine right of kings for centuries. It was true until it wasn't just like what you're saying now.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] jacksilver@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I mean, not really. We keep waffling between 45/55% of our government being controlled by fascists.

If 45% of the governing body is still fascist, that makes it kinda hard to actually do anything when most of our government requires more than a simple majority to get things done.

Just look at Trumps approval rating right now. It's still not below 40%.

[–] krashmo@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Merrick Garland didn't need Congress to do his job. Biden didn't need Congress to pressure Garland to do his job. Stop making excuses for their inaction.

[–] jacksilver@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

I agree that Biden is going to go down in history as a bad president for not doing more to prevent the current state of things, but when half the country keeps voting for facisim the problem isn't just the politicians.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Stop making excuses to once again hand Republicans future victories.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago

Felon, rapist, probable pedo, and literal traitor calling for others to be jailed.

[–] selkiesidhe@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 day ago

The gelatinous loser want pritzker jailed because pritzker doesn't like him. That's literally it.

Fuck off fascists!

[–] GEESELICHIC@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 day ago

I love that Pritzker looked straight into the camera & begged the POS to do it. This is what we need from leaders.

[–] boaratio@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

What the effing fuck?

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Psythik@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Epstein files

[–] Triumph@fedia.io 13 points 1 day ago

They're leaning so hard into the whole "'terroristic' speech" thing, aren't they? Just a naked contradiction, right out in the open, and it's apparently working.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Are the officers also duty-bound to get pepper-sprayed by the ICEstapo while they are kidnapping and disappearing naked children?

Just wondering what policy it is that Taco is pushing the Mayor to enforce...

[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Failure to protect is the name of the game in law enforcement. Long standing precedent that they are not legally required to protect anyone under any circumstances, despite the motto "protect and serve". Pretty sure that includes armed federal thugs.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mikenurre@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

ok sure /s RELEASE THE EPSTEIN FILES!

load more comments
view more: next ›