this post was submitted on 12 Oct 2025
535 points (98.9% liked)

politics

26029 readers
2139 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TomArrr@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

This is mtg basically admitting she doesn't know how to trade in crypto

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 11 points 9 hours ago

There is nothing so wonderful to watch but a messy divorce between MTG and GOP. No punch that hits is wasted.

Keep the popcorn machine on standby, it's going to be entertaining.

[–] madjo@feddit.nl 18 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

What person with a brain is whispering good things to say to MTG? Keep it up, maybe she learns something.

[–] LittleBorat3@lemmy.world 9 points 10 hours ago (4 children)

Lol what has happened, is she off her meds and seeing clearly wtf

[–] VindictiveJudge@lemmy.world 14 points 9 hours ago

She's a Qanon die-hard first, Trump supporter second. A portion of the Qanon faction has started to break with Trump over the Epstein stuff.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 11 points 9 hours ago

MTG entered office as a 'the establishment is corrupt, all the conspiracy theories are real' under Biden.

Now that 'her team' has won, now the establishment is all corrupt and there's tons of actual conspiracies... So in a way, she's actually shockingly consistent..

[–] 3abas@lemmy.world 6 points 9 hours ago

She actually got exposed to the horrors of her government on Instagram and began questioning a lifetime of brainwashing. She's not exactly and intellectual leftist, but a big crack was formed.

This is why the US bought TikTok, to eliminate access to non US propaganda.

[–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago

She is doing the grift where she correctly names all the problems to get people to think she understands them. But her solution is to vote for Trump harder.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 25 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

There is no harsher enemy than a disappointed lover. MTG and GOP will be a seriously messy divorce, and I'm keeping the popcorn machine on standby. This is going to be FUN.

[–] Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Wait, didn't you post almost the exact thing in this same thread just a few hours after this?

I'm not complaining, I like the comments and I agree with them. I just felt deja vu reading this and when I scrolled back up to see the same username, I was like, "huh, maybe there was a glitch?"

[–] joker125@lemmy.world 24 points 13 hours ago

I live in her district. I call her office every day pushing the Epstein files. I’m doing my part.

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 18 points 14 hours ago

Trump will reap what he's sown by having not picked her for a cushy cabinet position. She loved him, dammit!

[–] ouRKaoS@lemmy.today 25 points 16 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 12 points 16 hours ago

She's not the worst person I know. She's in the top ten, but not the worst.

[–] Bennyboybumberchums@lemmy.world 13 points 16 hours ago

This is the problem with social media. Everyone is trying to get worthless internet points by riffing on the popular "The worst person you know...." meme. Meanwhile, no one is talking about the actual robbery that happened in plain sight just a few days ago that she is talking about.

The Crypto flash crash of October 10th was nothing short of out in the open corruption that vaporised billions of dollars in seconds. A crypto bro, Konstantin Galish killed himself after losing tens of millions that didnt actually belong to him. And all of it was triggered by well timed tweets by the paedo and chef, Donald Drumpf.

Heres a video on it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=23ddxotpMZM

[–] candyman337@lemmy.world 25 points 19 hours ago

Man she really didn't realize he was like this huh? She was just here for racism not the fascism, what a fool

[–] 33550336@lemmy.world 3 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

My perverted mind thought this is a dominatrix in the thumbnail

[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 2 points 14 hours ago

You'll never know unless you ask. I could believe it.

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 28 points 1 day ago (2 children)

She's the sacrificial Republican this time around.

[–] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 4 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

She is likely going to maneuver into Speakership. She knows Trump isn't lasting and this version of Greene she's putting out will demolish Vance.

She's playing to win a longer game.

[–] frog_brawler@lemmy.world 4 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Admittedly, I'm a little impressed. She's smarter than I thought. I still don't like her, but I'm not going to say that I hate her anymore.

[–] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 hours ago

Her creeping through AOC's mailbox before she was a politician keeps her well in the 'nope' camp for me. She's proving herself more dangerous right now IMO.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Unattributed@feddit.online 29 points 1 day ago (3 children)

What timeline are we living in where MTG is actually starting to talk sensibly about some of the bull-puckey that Trump is pulling?

Don't get me wrong - she still is not a good person, in fact she is downright despicable on many levels. But crap, she's actually talking against Trump on two issues now.

But, honestly, I doubt her sincerity on the tariffs issue. It's most likely that she's concerned that the businesses that have been stuffing her pockets for years won't stuff her pockets anymore.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 10 points 13 hours ago

I think that unlike some others in the maga leadership, she was a true believer. She believed in all the most dubious deep state conspiracy theories. She thought this movement was about purging deep state corruption, and replacing it with some more meritocratic system. A big old dose of racism in there but with her rationalizing it with convenient conspiracy theories.

Now she's faced with more blatant objective evidence of conspiracies. So she gets turned a bit by the betrayal.

Over a long enough time span, I think MTG is doomed to always, eventually turn against whomever is ostensibly "in charge". She'll go for conspiracy theories and of course the people in charge are to blame.

[–] Gt5@lemmy.zip 5 points 14 hours ago

More than two - Israel, Epstein files, ai regulation, healthcare and influencer transparency before this.

[–] joker125@lemmy.world 3 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

She’s pivoting. The writing is on the wall for trump. She wants to be speaker of the house and run for potus in 28.

[–] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 2 points 12 hours ago

She knows two things well: 1: the Trump base and 2: that Trump ain't lasting much longer.

[–] tanisnikana@lemmy.world 142 points 1 day ago (10 children)

If I’m giving her the absolute benefit of the doubt, it just feels like she was an uneducated conservative parent who fell for Trump, and only just lately has she actually woken up to what he’s about.

It’s probably not as good as this though.

[–] Tm12@lemmy.ca 90 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I think she’s distancing herself from anything Epstein while she still can.

[–] cmbabul@slrpnk.net 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I’ve said this a few time on here, but I’m originally from spitting distance from her district, and based on my experience with so many other folks just like her; protecting children, specifically from conspiratorial trafficking and SA, is her number 1 priority, she’s usually really fucking bad at identifying ways to productively do so because she’s very poorly educated and indoctrinated, but if she has 100% confirmation Trump raped a child, which isn’t unlikely, she would almost certainly turn on him like it seems she has.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 2 points 5 hours ago

Yeah, at least the voters actually do care about "protecting the children." They've just been lied to a lot and are told it's trans people and illegal immigrants who they need to protect them from. Once they see the truth, that it's the ultra-wealthy elite who are the real evil people, they may do the right thing. You just have to break them out of their bubble, which is really hard.

[–] whiwake@lemmy.cafe 80 points 1 day ago (18 children)

Right. I think she’s putting her money on Trump failing so she can run for president and say “see, I stood up”

Which is a brilliant move, if project 2025 fails.

load more comments (18 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 53 points 1 day ago (2 children)

MAGA loves MTG. She's positioning herself to take over after Trump dies. She basically needs to prepare ammunition to attack other contenders with.

[–] neidu3@sh.itjust.works 30 points 1 day ago (3 children)

She could always go all out on a wedge issue: Release the Epstein files.

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 8 points 19 hours ago

She did exactly that.

[–] mercano@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

She is one of the three Republicans who have signed the discharge petition to force a vote on bill to release the Epstein files. (Bobert is another one, go figure.)

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] krooklochurm@lemmy.ca 39 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It is so strange to keep stumbling across things this dumb cunt says that I agree with.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›