A community for a webcomic of romance, sarcasm, math, and language.
Title text:
If you don't know where you are on Earth, the angle of satellite dishes can help constrain your latitude. If some of them are pointing straight up, you're probably near the Equator, right under the ring.
Transcript:
Transcript will show once it’s been added to explainxkcd.com
Source: https://xkcd.com/3156/
Hey I am into this! Check out this site I built for tracking satellites!
It is comforting knowing that our planet is protected by a dense layer of floating garbage. 🫡🚀🗑️
Your use of the word "dense" there is a little misleading. At the default view the scale of each satelite pixel looks roughly 20km wide.
Indeed, that's a joke I'm always saying, that every sat is the size of rhode island
Well Rhode Island is famously tiny so I doubt it's a problem
Hah, if satellites were actually that large... It still wouldn't actually be a problem. It's really hard to grasp just how far things are apart up in geostationary orbit, there is a truly immense amount is space. There's plenty of elbow room for thousands of Rhode Islands floating around up there, no reason to worry about collisions.
Unintentional sick burn on Saturn.
Whats the difference between the thin green horizontal ring and the wide orange horizontal ring that is slightly tilted?
Green is active, orange is debris or dead sats. When a GEO sat runs out of life / power / fuel the operators are supposed to move it out of the main corridor to make room, so often they are in the same ring but higher or lower
I'd appreciate if I could use your website without advertisement cookies. Would you mind complying with EU cookie law?
I'm not familiar, what is the law, that we cannot use authentication cookies or google/twitter analytics cookies?
The 'cookie' law is (mainly) the ePrivacy Directive, that requires websites to get a user's informed, specific, and affirmative consent before storing or accessing non-essential information on their device.
To comply a website must inform users about their cookie usage (who is using it, why, and how long they are stored, I think) and allow users to easily withdraw their consent at any time (though there's no requirement to easily decline).
Actualy looking at the site, it already might be? I'm not sure, I don't remember the specifics of the law. But there is a banner pop up and you do inform cookies are used and why, and there's an easy way to withdraw consent.
Yeah that's what my one guy said was enough at the time, and we've got some European partners who never brought it up, so maybe it's good enough with the banner?
Thats so cool! Looks loke the most popular orbit aligns with the equator. Why is the wider "belt" around that line going over and under? Like
.
..
...
------
...
..
.
You know what I mean?
Making an educated guess as a layperson, besides some satellites that are geosynchronous but not geostationary, I'd assume those are primarily old geostationary satellites in graveyard orbits - when they're EOL, satellites in those orbits are supposed to perform a small boost out of them, usually adding a few hundred km to their orbit's radius (GEO is about 36,000km in altitude, so a few hundred km is relatively small). Then, without station keeping, I believe they should naturally precess around the Laplace plane, which will range between roughly Earth's equator and the ecliptic plane (the plane of Earth's orbit). At GEO altitudes the Laplace plane is about 7.2 degrees inclined from the equator. I believe that would mean, starting at the equator with an inclination of 0 degrees, these satellites should precess to about 14.4 degrees and back to 0 over several decades (excluding other perturbations, of course).
I found this online which would seem to confirm at least the mechanics: https://amostech.com/TechnicalPapers/2013/Orbital_Debris/ROSENGREN.pdf
From what I could find that’s probably the band of decommissioned geosynchronous satellites. Apparently they’ll slowly match the orbital plane of the earth around the sun.
those are mostly red and orange, so that also confirms the other comments' guesses:
I’ve bookmarked this website. That’s so cool. One of my new favourites now. Thanks for making it.
Wow thanks! If you like this, on Monday I'm planning to release an update that will let you rewind the viewer all the way back to 1959 and see the first launch of Sputnik. Then let it play forward to today sped up so you can see the growth of satellite counts. Also a new public API to fetch the TLEs from any date. I'm hoping this will let folks do interesting stuff with all that data - maybe AI training or research projects etc.
That sounds awesome, I’m looking forward to it.
I browsed for a while and then realized, holy shit, they're moving. Is this real-time? Either way, this is awesome.
Wow thanks so much!
Yes, so I'm taking every telescope/radio/radar reading I'm allowed to redistribute and then collecting them into a time series database and fetching the most recent reading for each sat into a text file. That's the TLE download in the public API. Then I use Rust WASM to propagate those readings into positions that are synced with the viewer time. This allows us to very roughly forecast where they will be for the next couple days.
It's cool because it's too much data to transfer over the network, so we only transfer the most recent reading and then calculate positions live in the browser.
Where are the Lagrange points?
What the fuck, I had no idea we had so many satellites. Also, this site is really cool. Thank you for making this!
I know it blew my mind too when I first started building this! It's such a cool project to get to build!
Go near the equator and look at where satellite dishes are pointed. They're not typically straight up, they tend to be pointed pretty far east/west depending on where you are exactly.
Most countries don't have their own satellites specifically in line with them, they're often all using the same ones.
If you're pointing a static satellite dish and expecting constant connection, that's a geostationary satellite. East and west is still an equatorial ring
I guess we must've liked it.
Since we put a ring on it.
If so it's an abusive marriage
This actually got me to check something.
I used to spend a lot of time in a location where all of the satellite dishes seemed to point towards a major non-satellite broadcast mast. People in the area were, and probably still are, somewhat suspicious, because that's where their regular roof aerials also point.
However, that mast happens to be largely south, or, you might say equator-wards of there. In the same direction as a ring of satellites orbiting above the equator, perhaps.
So I've just been on street view to check for satellite dishes roughly an equal distance south of the mast. They also point south. Regular TV aerials point the other way, to the regular broadcast tower.
Suspicion debunked!
Isn't there some evidence that Mars also had rings? Or at least there is an unanswered question as to whether its moons came from rings or are headed to rings. Is that not in the same confidence domain we think Earth had rings?
Not rings, circles. Nine of them.