this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2025
187 points (96.1% liked)

Fuck AI

4362 readers
930 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It hasn't yet crossed my mind that we would soon have to start attaching a hand-drawn signature of ours to each of our email just to prove that we are indeed humans.

Always a step ahead, companies already show that they won't be ever interested in distinguishing real people from robots. After all, both are only just means of generating revenue, no?

top 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Flocklesscrow@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 day ago

This should be prosecutable fraud.

[–] protist@mander.xyz 42 points 2 days ago (2 children)

This looks like an ad. There have been fake signatures in ads for decades. I regularly get mail made to look like it's handwritten even though its printed, because they're trying to sell something and want you to read it.

[–] bitwolf@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

Anderson windows got me a few times with the hand-written font

[–] nickiwest@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Not gonna lie. I felt betrayed when I found out Betty Crocker was a marketing invention.

[–] protist@mander.xyz 6 points 2 days ago

"An apple a day keeps the doctor away" was a marketing slogan from Big Apple

"When it rains, it pours" was a marketing slogan from Morton Salt

There are more lol

[–] Flamekebab@piefed.social 32 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Whenever a prerecorded message plays over a tannoy saying something like "we apologise for the inconvenience" I get annoyed.

There is no "we" to be apologetic. The message could express what has gone wrong, or what is being done, but expressing emotion on behalf of a non-living entity can fuck right off.

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 17 points 2 days ago (1 children)

"We are experiencing higher than normal call volume" is one that sets my asd brain off like crazy. You don't constantly have higher than expected calls you're a fucking liar with insufficient staffing

[–] shrugs@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

If expectation depends on wishful thinking and not on reality, everything is possible.

As long as bad support doesn't influence profit , why even care?

[–] saltesc@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I appreciate the newer gens of ACDs.

"We're currently experiencing more calls then expected. Your current wait time is 20 minutes. Press 1 if you'd like us to call you then, otherwise you can stay on the line."

Well, thank you. No need to bring empty apologies into it when you're giving me information and options.

Edit: Of course, I'm finally talking to someone an hour later because I keep missing the callbacks. But that's on me and I apologise for any inconvenience I may be causing.

[–] jlow@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Is this a thing? Helping me putting my best foot forward? How far is that gonna get me? Maybe I'll just take the 1:2 chance of getting it right myself?

[–] nucleative@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Maybe the Japanese hanko stamp isn't such a bad idea after all?

[–] officermike@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago (2 children)

"email me with any quesions"

[–] b_tr3e@feddit.org 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

'quésion' is Spanish for 'cheesing'.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'd be interested in a cheesing; but is that to bestow cheese upon me, or to festoon cheese upon me? One of them is vastly better than the other.

[–] b_tr3e@feddit.org 1 points 1 day ago

I don't know. I don't speak any Spanish.

[–] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago

I mean, typos happen.

[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Let's see what bonzai buddy says

Nah, the Virtuagirl, the desktop strippers!

[–] Davel23@fedia.io 6 points 2 days ago

That picture looks like it's from a '70s cookbook.

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Wonder how many people I interact with don’t exist

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Heck, I'm not sure whether YOU exist, and I'm assuming you're pretty sure about the matter.

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

How do I know I’m real? Maybe this is how AI feels.

[–] Greg@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 days ago

I wonder if this AI will eventually get done for sexual harassment given Sam Altman is opening up smut on OpenAI platforms

[–] ruuster13@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

How do we know she doesn't exist? I'm more than willing to believe it's true but if you don't provide evidence, your argument is as valid as the average conservative rag.

[–] s@piefed.world 9 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

~~I can’t speak for this case in particular, but~~ I did encounter a number of job finder and résumé help websites with AI personae presented as real people with human names while I was job searching. At least ZipRecruiter does disclose somewhere on their site that their AI “Phil” isn’t a human, despite its use of personal pronouns such as “I” in emails.

Edit: Actually, I was able to find “Claudia Baker” in my old emails from the time when I was job searching. The résumé review from JobLeads is no longer available so I can’t provide the text output, but I 100% remember it being a frustrating load of AI slop in a time when I was desperate for help and really wondering what was wrong on my end. The situation was incredibly manipulative and insulting.

[–] hansolo@lemmy.today 1 points 2 days ago

Are we sure this isn't just a slop frontend for a pig butchering scam LLM?