Based Tsoding
Programmer Humor
Welcome to Programmer Humor!
This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!
For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.
Rules
- Keep content in english
- No advertisements
- Posts must be related to programming or programmer topics
I'm a girl. I'm not interested in Haskell, that's too frigging endofunctiorific. Erlang! That's what all the cool guys are doing.
What about going an extra step into Elixir?
No mom, I'm gonna BE a girl for Christmas. puts on programming socks
That's 100% how I read it at first.
Hello everyone, and welcome to yet another recreational programming session with who?
I don't think "programmer" fully captures the reality of being an emacs-based programmer.
Well, JSON is an easy format to parse. The spec can fit onto one page.
This kind of text hits differently when you're a lesbian.
Wouldn’t it hit the same as it would a straight male?
POV: Not all moms are accepting of their daughters being into girls.
Jokes on her, I've transitioned since last Christmas.
You can still bring a girl though
I am the girl! Hmm, but maybe I'll bring another one too? 🤔
You gotta admit though, Haskell is crazy good for parsing and marshaling data
Yes. I'm divided into "hum... 100 lines is larger than I expected" and "what did he mean 'from scratch'? did he write the parser combinators? if so, 100 lines is crazy small!"
But I'm settling in believing 80 of those lines are verbose type declarations.
I decided to write it myself for fun. I decided that "From Scratch" means:
- No parser libraries (parsec/happy/etc)
- No using
readfrom Prelude - No hacky meta-parsing
Here is what I came up with (using my favourite parsing method: parser combinators):
import Control.Monad ((>=>), replicateM)
import Control.Applicative (Alternative (..), asum, optional)
import Data.Maybe (fromMaybe)
import Data.Functor (($>))
import Data.List (singleton)
import Data.Map (Map, fromList)
import Data.Bifunctor (first, second)
import Data.Char (toLower, chr)
newtype Parser i o = Parser { parse :: i -> Maybe (i, o) } deriving (Functor)
instance Applicative (Parser i) where
pure a = Parser $ \i -> Just (i, a)
a <*> b = Parser $ parse a >=> \(i, f) -> second f <$> parse b i
instance Alternative (Parser i) where
empty = Parser $ const Nothing
a <|> b = Parser $ \i -> parse a i <|> parse b i
instance Monad (Parser i) where
a >>= f = Parser $ parse a >=> \(i, b) -> parse (f b) i
instance Semigroup o => Semigroup (Parser i o) where
a <> b = (<>) <$> a <*> b
instance Monoid o => Monoid (Parser i o) where
mempty = pure mempty
type SParser = Parser String
charIf :: (a -> Bool) -> Parser [a] a
charIf cond = Parser $ \i -> case i of
(x:xs) | cond x -> Just (xs, x)
_ -> Nothing
char :: Eq a => a -> Parser [a] a
char c = charIf (== c)
one :: Parser i a -> Parser i [a]
one = fmap singleton
str :: Eq a => [a] -> Parser [a] [a]
str = mapM char
sepBy :: Parser i a -> Parser i b -> Parser i [a]
sepBy a b = (one a <> many (b *> a)) <|> mempty
data Decimal = Decimal { mantissa :: Integer, exponent :: Int } deriving Show
data JSON = Object (Map String JSON) | Array [JSON] | Bool Bool | Number Decimal | String String | Null deriving Show
whitespace :: SParser String
whitespace = many $ asum $ map char [' ', '\t', '\r', '\n']
digit :: Int -> SParser Int
digit base = asum $ take base [asum [char c, char (toLower c)] $> n | (c, n) <- zip (['0'..'9'] <> ['A'..'Z']) [0..]]
collectDigits :: Int -> [Int] -> Integer
collectDigits base = foldl (\acc x -> acc * fromIntegral base + fromIntegral x) 0
unsignedInteger :: SParser Integer
unsignedInteger = collectDigits 10 <$> some (digit 10)
integer :: SParser Integer
integer = asum [char '-' $> (-1), char '+' $> 1, str "" $> 1] >>= \sign -> (sign *) <$> unsignedInteger
-- This is the ceil of the log10 and also very inefficient
log10 :: Integer -> Int
log10 n
| n < 1 = 0
| otherwise = 1 + log10 (n `div` 10)
jsonNumber :: SParser Decimal
jsonNumber = do
whole <- integer
fraction <- fromMaybe 0 <$> optional (str "." *> unsignedInteger)
e <- fromIntegral . fromMaybe 0 <$> optional ((str "E" <|> str "e") *> integer)
pure $ Decimal (whole * 10^log10 fraction + signum whole * fraction) (e - log10 fraction)
escapeChar :: SParser Char
escapeChar = char '\\'
*> asum [
str "'" $> '\'',
str "\"" $> '"',
str "\\" $> '\\',
str "n" $> '\n',
str "r" $> '\r',
str "t" $> '\t',
str "b" $> '\b',
str "f" $> '\f',
str "u" *> (chr . fromIntegral . collectDigits 16 <$> replicateM 4 (digit 16))
]
jsonString :: SParser String
jsonString =
char '"'
*> many (asum [charIf (\c -> c /= '"' && c /= '\\'), escapeChar])
<* char '"'
jsonObjectPair :: SParser (String, JSON)
jsonObjectPair = (,) <$> (whitespace *> jsonString <* whitespace <* char ':') <*> json
json :: SParser JSON
json =
whitespace *>
asum [
Object <$> fromList <$> (char '{' *> jsonObjectPair `sepBy` char ',' <* char '}'),
Array <$> (char '[' *> json `sepBy` char ',' <* char ']'),
Bool <$> asum [str "true" $> True, str "false" $> False],
Number <$> jsonNumber,
String <$> jsonString,
Null <$ str "null"
]
<* whitespace
main :: IO ()
main = interact $ show . parse json
This parses numbers as my own weird Decimal type, in order to preserve all information (converting to Double is lossy). I didn't bother implementing any methods on the Decimal, because there are other libraries that do that and we're just writing a parser.
It's also slow as hell but hey, that's naive implementations for you!
It ended up being 113 lines. I think I could reduce it a bit more if I was willing to sacrifice readability and/or just inline things instead of implementing stdlib typeclasses.
So, ARE you bringing a girl?
I'm not coming to my parents for this new year's because I might get arrested and/or sent to die in a war. But once Putin dies, yes, I am
So that's two things to look forward to!
Didn't know where you were talking about til you said Putin.
There are far more male programmers... As a programmer, be gay or stay alone... Choose!
It's odd in the Australian public service, with COBOL programmers. They've been in the job long enough that they started when the public service was the only employer who would employ women as programmers. I'm on the systems analyst side of the fence, the programmers I have worked with include a bit more than 60% women
I think all the programmers I know are married or gay or not interested. I think the gay ones are mostly married too.
Can programmers only be with other programmers or am I missing something?
Well yeah, obv. But not enough girls in computer science, so like the fishes, some of them magically turn into girls after a while.
"JSON parser 100% from scratch in Haskell in 110 lines" doesn't get you horny? I guess some people are just wired differently.
I’m a programmer myself but my wife isn’t a programmer, that was my motivation for questioning.
Oh, is she, like, an EE or something? Maybe a web designer?
Don't worry. I mean nothing but humour by it. I myself am married to a physicist who takes absolutely no interest whatsoever in programming, but can talk happily for ages about something weird they found.
But you kind of have to leave the house for that... I mean... We talk about programmers....
/s
You just need to find a girl that also likes Tsoding! Then, you can ask her "Hey, do you have plans for Christmas? I'd love it if we could do AoC (Advent of Code) in a language we both hate!"