this post was submitted on 27 Oct 2025
40 points (71.7% liked)

Ask Lemmy

35303 readers
1789 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In the 90's a lot of popular song were pretty political, remember Killing in the name of and even the skate pop-punk has pretty popular political song's (Offspring, Blink Green-day). Actually political movies were also quite big in the 90's/00's (French Masterpiece La haine, or the whole work of Michael Moore).

I would expect to see that the people who were teens/young adult at the time would tackle all these issues 20-30 years latter when they'll finally take the power and the reality is that everything got worse, than even talking about-it make you sound like a radical, and that the gen-X/Millennials totally failed to change something.

What happened ? and how did we fail ?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] collapse_already@lemmy.ml 10 points 15 hours ago

GenX has never had nor will it ever have significant political power. Outnumbered by older and younger generations. Also, I doubt we're very unified in our political beliefs and asperations since we tend to be pretty independent and mostly want to avoid attracting too much attention.

[–] balance8873@lemmy.myserv.one 8 points 16 hours ago

Everyone thinks grandpa should die but nobody wants to kill their grandpa

[–] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 33 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Boomers are still in electorate power by a long shot.

[–] nucleative@lemmy.world 10 points 16 hours ago

I feel like this is pretty much it.

We're busy AF trying to live and the boomers now have nothing to do except vote.

[–] Flocklesscrow@lemmy.zip 3 points 12 hours ago

Exactly this. Boomers have been pulling themselves and everyone else into the mud for 50+ years. They've had a massively outsized impact on society because there are just so many of them and they're collectively dumb as rocks, and just as empathetic.

[–] Waldelfe@feddit.org 13 points 23 hours ago

I'm 40. The largest voting group in my country is 60+. It really doesn't have a lot of effect what you vote or try to do as someone <60, 60+ decides. Same goes for a lot of companies I've been in. 50+ is in the majority, especially in positions of power. Either learn to talk like them and kiss their ass or you'll never succeed and be out of the job in no time.

Millenials are just not in charge. I've seen it in so many areas of life, be it business or civil society. Younger people try to change something and someone 50/60+ will scream bloody murder so things will stay the same because "we can't alienate those people".

[–] SaneMartigan@aussie.zone 15 points 1 day ago

Every generation has lost at class warfare.

[–] yermaw@sh.itjust.works 5 points 23 hours ago

You can pretty much vibe out the answer by looking at how the world is today. We have as standard devices in our pockets at all times that can connect us to anyone else. Anyone can create a video message that can be seen by pretty much anyone and everyone on the planet.

In theory we have more power and potential unity than any other human society in history, and its somehow getting worse.

[–] MisterNeon@lemmy.world 144 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Millennials failed by not being born in the 50's. I think you're making an assumption that newer generations took over politically from Boomers and The Silent Generation, but that shift never occurred. We failed at political change because we never had the same political, social, and economic power as Boomers.

[–] HerrVorragend@lemmy.world 46 points 1 day ago (6 children)

This is the correct answer.

And as Boomers are slowly getting older, even they now see that they need a successor. So they look at... GenZ.

I slowly realize us GenX and Millenials are just some sort of placeholder generation.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip 34 points 1 day ago

Millennials were children in the 90s, don't blame us we didn't fix shit.

It's been the obscenely wealthy of every generation that has fucked everything, not any one demographic in particular.

[–] Washedupcynic@lemmy.ca 26 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I'm 45, I've been pegged into being a gen x-er, and a millennial. I can't really speak for either generation, but at this point I feel I have more in common financially with millennials, despite having absolutely 0 adult supervision the way many genXers experienced. What I can say is that my cohort is tired, financially fucked over, and ready to burn it all to the ground.

[–] JigglySackles@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago

Tired xennials unite...eventually...maybe just nod in passing. Fuck I'm tired

[–] thermal_shock@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

It's been this way since before the banking system of the Catholic Church by the Medici family in Italy in the 1400s. Money always breeds corruption and power. Nothing new, history repeats itself. We just need to start killing the rich like they did back then. Corruption and abuse/extortion should face actual consequences.

[–] wizblizz@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

All the generational stuff does is divide us. No war but class war.

[–] chunes@lemmy.world 79 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's a class war, not a generational one. Millennials have just as many rich jerks as any other generation.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There is an element of generational conflict that is tied into the class war. Most Boomers have moved on from being labor to being on fixed income and capital returns.

A bunch of assets millineals will never have. They are not aware of how pretentious they are with their retirement parties while they invite those who have no hopes of ever having one. It's so frustrating. It's like, yay, I'll just come celebrate your pension and your lufe with goals while my generation plans a bullet for retirement.

[–] dontsayaword@piefed.social 52 points 1 day ago

We never got the power. Look at the government, everyone is 80 years old.

[–] LoafedBurrito@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago

Those are songs, not actions. Many of us had much larger plans and were sold a life that we never had the opportunity to have.

Most of us got trapped in low wage jobs or not getting a job at all after college. All of us had to go through several recessions, inflation skyrocketing, politicians bought by the wealthy so you can't run for office unless you are well connected, housing market crashed, etc.

Getting into politics to change all of the issues we saw was never an option. There is always a wealthier, better connected opponent to win.

Trickle down economics was a lie and most of us got cheated out of life and never got to amass the wealth needed to actually MAKE CHANGE HAPPEN. We spend all our time working, keeping our little relationships alive, and trying to make it day to day.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 33 points 1 day ago (14 children)

Because there's still more boomers than gen X...

Even after a lot of boomers are dying off. Generations after X were immediately larger, so there's never been or never will be a time where Gen X is the largest/target demographic.

It just happens like that sometimes, Gen X just never had the numbers

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] Fondots@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I think the basic premise of your question is kind of flawed.

Generational age brackets are always a little fuzzy, but most definitions tend to define millennials as people born from about 1981-1996

Which means come the end of the 90's, the oldest millennials were just turning 18, the youngest were just entering preschool, the "average" millennial would have been about 10. Personally, I was 8 in 1999.

So most of us weren't exactly politically-aware in the 90s, let alone actively criticizing anything besides homework. And a lot of us probably had parents who wouldn't have let us listen to RATM because of the parental advisory sticker on their albums.

My main concerns at the time were things like video games and cartoons

Then right around the time we started to be old enough to really form political opinions, 9/11 happened and the world went insane around us.

[–] TheAlbatross@lemmy.blahaj.zone 29 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Gen X isn't as radical on the whole as one might think (of course there's some incredibly rad exceptions) and, well, boomers haven't died off yet. They still hold most of the wealth ergo most of the power in America. It's a geriocracy and it ain't the 50+ year old Millenials running the show.

[–] starlinguk@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

And yet, whenever I go to demonstrations, they're mostly attended by Gen-X-ers.

At my age, my parents were on their 5th house. My rent takes half my paycheck and I'm trapped here because I can't afford to move.

[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago

when they'll finally take the power

This has still not happened.

Boomers are still a massively oversized voting demographic, so vast quantities of political energy are still spent on them.

They're also typically more susceptible to modern propaganda techniques than any subsequent demographic.

The bulk of modern propaganda is trying to stop people from seeing and tackling the issues causing the problems. If people get angry at immigrants, they'll not point their fingers at the ultra-wealthy who are actually causing all the issues pricing them out of living their lives.

The people in power are predominantly boomers and gen-Xers with views that align with boomers. There're practically no millennials in any position of meaningful power across most of the world's politics. The more radical gen-Xers were never let into the establishment parties, so they languished in the political cold unable to get enough votes under FPTP based systems.

No one can really change shit until the generations go back to being roughly the same size as each other. Hopefully it's not too late to fix things by that point.

[–] Boozilla@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago

Reminder that the oligarchs want us divided and fighting each other.

[–] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The “baby boom” (whence Boomers) was called that because it was a huge demographic spike that has given that birth cohort disproportionate political and cultural power ever since—and the generation most negatively impacted by that was the immediately-following Gen X. (Even now, after decades of an increasing mortality rate, Boomers still outnumber Gen X by about 8 million.)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] the_riviera_kid@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago

Because the shit head boomers are still in charge and doing everything in their power to keep it that way.

[–] QuoVadisHomines@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 day ago (2 children)

There’s a huge gap between those that understood RATM’s message and those who owned their albums. Many people liked their music but would never oppose capitalism especially when it worked for them.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 day ago

We're not monolithic. No generation is. Those movies were kinda popular, but they found their success with a subset of the generation, not the entire group.

Just like every other generation, when we're relatively comfortable (or exhausted from daily survival), we don't have time to foment revolution.

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

A few reasons.

Part of it is that wealth never really got passed down to us. Boomers got money and houses from their parents. Some GenX got money and houses from theirs. Millennials increasingly have family that live longer because of modern medicine (depending on your family, good or bad) and increasingly have family that burn through all their money because they want to buy mypillows and trump watches. Not to mention how many of us went zero contact because of the aforementioned trumpism.

Which, combined with multiple economic crises (how many of us saw the job market and said "I'mma gonna get a PhD and deal with that later"?) means that millennials have kinda been struggling to even get their lives "started" well into their late 30s. Hard to become a professional politician when you are always a few months away from poverty.

And the last part is... 9-11 kinda fucked us. Basically starting in the early 00s it became a mortal sin to criticize the military. Even today, we are allowed to criticize "the military industrial complex" but NOT the brave men and women who are on our streets oppressing people and helping ice round up brown people and protesters.

So by the time a good chunk of millennials reached the point where we are stable enough to fight and the world isn't going to villify us for doing so... we also have responsibilities. In your teens and twenties you can talk about burning it all down and quitting your job to live in a tent for 14 months while you smoke weed and protest and smoke weed. You might have kids that you need to give a chance at a better life. A partner with medical concerns. Or just a cat that would slit your throat in your sleep if you moved into a tent.

So all the pushes for progressive politics and the like get us labeled as "traitor neo libs' by the kids who want to live in tents and film tiktoks and protest and film tiktoks. And when you get told "okay boomer" when you are in your 30s... it is REAL fucking demoralizing (this is where some jackass replies "okay boomer").

[–] sanguinepar@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Pedantry, but the song is called Killing in the Name. There's no "of" in the title.

load more comments
view more: next ›