this post was submitted on 27 Oct 2025
130 points (91.7% liked)

politics

26203 readers
2506 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] lemmy_outta_here@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

Everybody is talking about Platner and that is fine, but i wanted to recognize the Jacobin for publishing this.

Here is a socialist magazine defending a man with a sketchy tattoo on the basis of the bulk of his posts. Jacobin (and Marcetic, the author) are cutting against cancel culture accusations and upholding the truth-finding principle of good journalism. Bravo.

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

People latching onto this like it's some huge dealbreaker or a story about someone traitorous to progressive politics, you are probably the same people worked up about Hasan's dog. You guys NEED to take up reading actual novels with stories. Divert your emotional investment to actual stories you are allowed to get caught up in. It feels good, I recommend it highly.

You are all as bad as the right. I fucking swear, if this story bothers you, you are not well and you need to either touch grass or touch books. Just let this bullshit go. We have such bigger problems.

The right is going to elect actual nazis with nazi histories and nazi ideology to go with whatever symbols they have hidden away, and they're going to ignore every candidate on their side who has pictures surfacing of them wearing drag or having progressive takes in the past. They don't care. They want to win. Do you want to win?

I am quite convinced the old meme that the left hates victory and wants to lose is real. It's the exact same phenomenon as how conservative MAGAts want "daddy to choke them" but the left wants to be choked by institutions and politics broadly. I've never seen a political movement so intent on losing.

I hope you all get the perfect candidate so you can talk about how great he is while you're getting loading into train cars.

[–] YoFrodo@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

People latching onto this like it’s some huge dealbreaker or a story about someone traitorous to progressive politics, you are probably the same people worked up about Hasan’s dog.

What? These two things are not at all the same.

Platner seeks a position of power and the mere existence of a nazi tattoo shows questionable judgement at best and nazi sympathies at worst.

Its a pretty tame position to take in not wanting a politician with ANY connection to nazis

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Plum@lemmy.world 53 points 2 days ago

Reading through Platner’s many hundreds of anonymous comments, it’s hard to paint him as a secret white supremacist or far-right extremist of any kind. In fact, his posts more or less align with the persona he has presented to voters in the two months since he launched his campaign: a rough-around-the-edges military veteran and oyster farmer with a penchant for crude language and a passion for firearms and sustainable living who holds a variety of standard progressive views alongside some heterodox ones.

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 46 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I smelled a hatchet job.

Is it from the republicans or liberal dems?

[–] daannii@lemmy.world 45 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Maga. Israel. The usual. Possibly the Dem party. They really don't like these new unbought Dems coming in and making them look bad.

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 34 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Cuomo is literally a sex abuser and establishment democrats can’t get enough of him.

Jeffries should be ashamed it took him this long to endorse Mamdami. But good to know he’s a traitor to his supporters.

[–] PhilipTheBucket@piefed.social 23 points 2 days ago (5 children)

Cuomo is literally a sex abuser and establishment democrats can’t get enough of him.

It's not that they like Cuomo. It's that they hate Mamdani because he represents an actual threat to the wealth of their friends. They just have to cling to Cuomo because he's the only way they can fight Mamdani; stumping for the Republican instead will get them in trouble and give the game away.

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I don’t care if it sounds incredibly naive, but getting money out of politics would make life better for everyone who deserves it.

[–] daannii@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

People would become politicians because they genuinely have passion to fix things for the people.

Australia just banned corporate pac money. We should too.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mazzilius_marsti@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

the fucked up thing here is how did they find his reddit account? That post was years ago and he didnt even use some stupid username like "RealGrahamPlatner". Makes you wonder if those reddit post removal tool work at all...

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)
  1. They don't. Reddit still has a copy of everything you have ever typed on that website (even moreso now that they auto-save every draft message). They need to for liability reasons in case you were doing a Trevor Moore impression and talked about where you would put a mortar. It just has the added benefit of still providing training data for LLMs.
  2. I can't be sure what jacobin magazine was using, but CNN et al have already linked to actual archive.org scrapes of reddit that include his messages. I am not personally sure how "p-hustle" was linked to him and whether he disclosed that or others figured it out.
[–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

They don't need it for liability reasons; they just want to sell it as AI fodder.

[–] fox2263@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

So is he a goodie or a baddie. TELL ME WHAT TO THINK

[–] tuff_wizard@aussie.zone 16 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I think for many people getting a tattoo is a huge deal and we would never allow our skin to be marked without out a lot of forethought.

But I think there is a good chunk of the population that doesn’t think about it and don’t see it as a big deal. I think a lot of these people are concentrated in the military, the lack of forethought is increased when you are in a job that may well see you killed soon.

I’d like to see him reaching out to new and old military members to educate them on the meaning he apparently didn’t know about and pushing them to remove it.

Someone with some art skills should come up with a suitably cool modification tattoo that neutralises the nazi aspect and but still lets these guys support and identify with battle mates.

It’s not their fault the nazis happens co opt heaps of cool symbols and I don’t blame some 22 year old jar head for not knowing history (they should but the US education system has a lot to answer for).

If you give people an easy way out that lets them save face you’ll only be left with the actual racists.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago

Even if you know history, this is a fairly obscure symbol. I would bet there's a lot of people who know a lot about WWII and still wouldn't recognize it. For one, I don't think I would. I may have an "I've seen this symbol before..." moment, but I don't think I'd place it correctly on the spot.

[–] Garbagio@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I mean my contention isn't that he didn't know what it was, it's that you gotta be kidding me that he didn't learn what it was in the 20 years since. I don't give a shit about his reddit history; if anything its just kinda affable to me. Hell, I'd be willing to even take the tattoo at "I learned what it was at a really dark time in my life, and I just haven't confronted the tattoo itself, even if I conquered the ideologies that led to both its creation and its application to my body." Like obviously military service is its own alt-right pipeline. But like, bro, you got the super non-pirate skull and crossbones across your tit, bro, what are you doing?

Like I'm not even saying don't vote for him, deadass I'd still take his dumb ass over some Zionist shill 8 days a week. But, can nobody just call a spade a spade?

[–] mrmaplebar@fedia.io 7 points 1 day ago (8 children)

To be fair, just look at all the people who have Chinese words written on them that say something that they weren't trying to say. How many of those people have had those tattoos for many years without ever learning that they were incorrect or fixing them?

I wouldn't go this route personally, but I know enough about tattoos to say with a high degree of confidence that many people just pick something out of the books on the day of the walk-in because they think it looks cool. I could totally believe this guy and his marine buddies said "that's a cool skull, let's get that".

It's like, how many people have Punisher stickers or t-shirts but have never read a comic book in their lives? Probably most of them...

[–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

If I had Chinese symbols saying I was a nazi tattooed on me, I'd be at the nearest open parlor to get it covered up the same day I learned about it.

If he really did somehow just learn about it during the campaign, it should be gone by now.

Edit: which apparently it is, so good on him for that.

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah, that is generally referred to as "flash". The catalogue of stencils that an artist has on hand for walk ins and the like. And considering this was apparently some hole in the wall in Croatia (unclear if it was when he was in the military or at Blackwater), there is a good chance that entire catalogue was full of nazi shit and this had the least amount of swastikas.

But you, and many others, are fixated on him getting it. Which... it raises questions on his judgment, but people do stupid shit all the time. The issue is more the having kept it for 20 years while being terminally online (almost impossible to have not seen the Mitchell and Webb "are we the baddies" meme that is literally about totenkapfs) and being a self proclaimed military history buff. And then 5 years ago having talked about "punisher skulls" in association with, gasp, SS totenkapfs.

No true Scotsman faults the guy for making a mistake 20 years ago. We very much fault him for not having rectified it at all in the two decades since.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 19 points 2 days ago

Well, for the terminally online, the knee has already jerked. And in their defense, once bit, twice shy.

That being said, the number of terminally online Mainers for whom the oppo was a deal breaker probably can fit in a swimming pool.

And there are two things happening at once in this story. One is, the primary thread of the oppo; Platner did post those things, Platner did have a tattoo.

The second thing is the oppo release, its source, Mills, Schumer, and the act of Mainers being told who to like and whom to vote for. And at least in last weeks polling this seemed to be the case. So who does the oppo work on? Early polling seems to be showing that the timing of Mills announcement and the research being release/ coming from some of the least popular standing groups (specifically, corporate Democrats).

So it looks like the oppo was supposed to work on the more progressive types (and clearly, has been, I mean, look around), and that while thats been effective, Mainers dont care/ dont like being told who to like. This oppo dump may actually end up working against those who sourced it (corporate Dems). We need the polling pudding to thicken up a bit, but should know more when polling comes out this week (weds/ thurs/ fri).

load more comments
view more: next ›