this post was submitted on 29 Dec 2023
364 points (100.0% liked)

196

17640 readers
538 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.


Rule: You must post before you leave.



Other rules

Behavior rules:

Posting rules:

NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.

Other 196's:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] janNatan@lemmy.ml 46 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ironic coming from a member of an endangered species.

[–] usualsuspect191@lemmy.ca 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

And one that essentially remains in its juvenile form instead of undergoing metamorphosis

[–] Danterious@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Agreed. Also, does the axolotl mean anything?

Edit: Also since this is the closest post that I've found related to this topic. Is anyone here interested in a community where people make story-based forecasts for the future of something true today but won't be in the future? Here is an example I did recently

[–] FirstMajesticComet@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Also, does the axolotl mean anything?

I think it's just because they have derpy, cute faces.

[–] HonoraryMancunian@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Teeny tiny axolotl

There is really not a lottle

Of you. Not a jot or tittle

So I'll call you axolitl

[–] Diabolo96@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago

Probably unrelated but Axolotl is the the most used tool to fine-tune models by the AI community/researchers

[–] yetAnotherUser@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

It'd be cool to see a community about it, for sure!

[–] FlapKap 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

nah. "what currently exists must necessarily exist". it adds the "must", as in, "the world could not be otherwise." that statement alone is not contained in "what currently exists" so adding the "must" thus develops the statement further rather than just redoubling it.

Capitalists talking about nature, ecology, and planet earth.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago
[–] Lumelore@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 year ago

Is this from inspirobot?

[–] essellburns@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The opposing force is the idea that whatever exists is the result of luck, bad judgement, random choices or ill intent, rather than inherent or inevitable consequence.

It's not linear. History is one of those machines with the balls that fall down randomly and form a bell curve.

[–] BautAufWasEuchAufbaut@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

inherent or inevitable consequence

Can you give an example?

[–] essellburns@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

For example, the seeming contradiction between the values good people claim to pursue in life and the contradictions to those they're willing to tollerate.

That's not a product of the modern deceptions of a globalised economy as some have claimed, it's a product of the way humans are not capable of including the whole world in sense of what's real

And why do you think that? That's quite a sweeping statement.

[–] LemmyKnowsBest@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

This thought occurs to me every time I hear a U2 song play in the grocery store.

[–] Paradachshund@lemmy.today 1 points 1 year ago

There's truth to this, but it's very hyperbolically and pretentiously presented.