this post was submitted on 09 Dec 2024
662 points (98.3% liked)

Greentext

7244 readers
530 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 147 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

banjos quietly play in the background

[–] Thcdenton@lemmy.world 28 points 10 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AlexisFR@jlai.lu 146 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Heh, second cousin is far enough.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 41 points 10 months ago (6 children)

Second cousin means cousin second order (grandchild of a sibling of one of your grandparents), right?

[–] boonhet@lemm.ee 22 points 10 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Robust_Mirror@aussie.zone 14 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Another way I like to think of it is it's your parent's cousin's kid. So you can see why from their perspective it would feel more closely related, it would be like you having a kid and your cousin having a kid and then you seeing them together.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] MadBob@feddit.nl 81 points 10 months ago (1 children)

That happened to a few of my cousins years ago. We were at a family function so I thought they would've put two and two together, but alas.

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 22 points 10 months ago (4 children)
[–] MadBob@feddit.nl 12 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I saw that after pressing send and thought to myself, ah, no one'll pull me up on that.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 74 points 10 months ago (5 children)

Isn't there some sort of biological thing where you're more likely to be sexually attracted to your relatives if you don't know they're you're relatives

[–] olosta@lemmy.world 102 points 10 months ago (8 children)

Second degree cousins is not that close though. If every generation has three children, that's 27 persons. I thinks that for most of human history excluding second degree cousins from the acceptable partners pool would have been impossible. Communities were not that big.

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 14 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Second degree cousins

I can't stop laughing.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Kalcifer@sh.itjust.works 32 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

All I could find on this is something called "genetic sexual attraction" ^[1]^, though Wikipedia contains arguments that it's pseudoscience ^[1.1]^. Here's a Reddit post asking about this. ^[3]^.

Related to this, I also came across the "Westermarck effect" ^[2]^ which appears to suggest that people who grow up together are less likely to be romantically attracted to each other ^[2.1]^.

References

  1. "Genetic sexual attraction". Wikipedia. Published: 2024-10-14T18:46Z. Accessed: 2024-12-09T07:29Z. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genetic_sexual_attraction.
    1. §"Criticism"

      Critics of the hypothesis have called it pseudoscience. In a Salon piece, Amanda Marcotte called the concept "half-baked pseudoscientific nonsense that people dreamed up to justify continuing unhealthy, abusive relationships".[8] The use of "GSA" as an initialism has also been criticized, since it gives the notion that the phenomenon is an actual diagnosable "condition".

      Many have noted the lack of research on the subject. While acknowledging the "phenomenon of genetic sexual attraction", Eric Anderson, a sociologist and sexologist, noted in a 2012 book that "[t]here is only one academic research article" on the subject, and he critiqued the paper for using "Freudian psycho-babble".

  2. "Westermarck effect". Wikipedia. Published: 2024-09-26T14:09Z. Accessed: 2024-12-09T07:33Z. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Westermarck_effect.
    1. The Westermarck effect […] is a psychological hypothesis that states that people tend not to be attracted to peers with whom they lived like siblings before the age of six.

  3. "How does nature prevent us from feeling sexually attracted to relatives who are objectively sexually attractive? ". Author: "Morgentau7" (u/Morgentau7). "r/TooAfraidToAsk". Reddit. Published: 2024-09-25T17:50:08.227Z. Accessed: 2024-12-09T07:34Z. https://www.reddit.com/r/TooAfraidToAsk/comments/1fpaold/how_does_nature_prevent_us_from_feeling_sexually/.
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] psycho_driver@lemmy.world 67 points 10 months ago

This is how anons are conceived.

[–] rayquetzalcoatl@lemmy.world 66 points 10 months ago

Second cousins is kissing cousins, have at it!

[–] Reddfugee42@lemmy.world 52 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Second cousins hardly matters. Even 1st cousins only increase the chance of anomaly by 3%. 2nd cousins is background noise. If you make each other happy, go for it and let anyone who complains enjoy their divorces.

[–] Iheartcheese@lemmy.world 53 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] MintyAnt@lemmy.world 37 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] TJDetweiler@lemmynsfw.com 23 points 10 months ago (1 children)

3% chance it's his first cousins

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] HollowNaught@lemmy.world 42 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (4 children)

A lot of people here are saying that the more genetically similar you are to somebody, the more attractive they are (so long as you don't grow up with them). I'm here to tell you that those guys are completely wrong

Studies have shown that (in other animals unfortunately, not in humans) that the more genetically dissimilar two individuals are, the more attracted they are, so long as they can produce viable offspring (aka they can have kids)

This study would also be done on humans, but that would be slightly morally questionable

This is an evolutionary trait in order to incentivise us to increase the gene pool when possible. You can imagine what would happen if we only rucked our cousins (look at the royals)

Source: am biomed student

[–] DontMakeMoreBabies@lemm.ee 13 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (6 children)

Oh man we did the Hapsburgs in my genetics class and it's so fucking gross how closely related those incestuous fucks were. First cousins as closely related on a genetic level as siblings.

Edit: LOOK AT THIS UGLY FUCKER! Even better - these genetic monstrosities still have money.

[–] 0ops@lemm.ee 11 points 10 months ago
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] nifty@lemmy.world 28 points 10 months ago (4 children)

Eh second cousin marriage isn’t a big deal in some cultures

[–] BruceLee@sopuli.xyz 12 points 10 months ago

*Most of cultures

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 25 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (7 children)

Edit. I understand now, thanks.


What is a second cousin? Your cousins cousin? The person your aunt/uncle marrieds niece/nephew? That can't be right, that's not blood. Help! Lol

[–] Shieldtoad@sh.itjust.works 96 points 10 months ago (9 children)

I find this chart helpful to see family relationships.

[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 47 points 10 months ago

Then its not even an issue at all from a genetic standpoint. People might find their relationship weird but their children would turn out healthy.

[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 12 points 10 months ago

That is helpful, thanks

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] proudblond@lemmy.world 29 points 10 months ago (1 children)

My aunt’s kid is my cousin. My cousin’s kid and my kid are second cousins.

It’s essentially finding the most recent common ancestor. My cousins and I share grandparents. Second cousins share great-grandparents, and so on.

“Once removed” and such refers to generational differences. So, my first cousin’s kid is my first cousin once removed, and my kid’s second cousin.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 10 months ago

I used to work with this absolute idiot when I was a kid. He was married to his cousin. But apparently he was such a gross dude, that it was too much for her, so she left him. For his brother. She ended up having a couple kids, one with each brother.

Talk about going out of your way to keep it in the family. Their family tree was tied in a knot.

[–] Krauerking@lemy.lol 21 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Oh hey look. The story of how Rudy Giuliani found his wife!

Edit: ex wife, sorry forgot the church didn't condone their boning like they wanted so they had to get a divorce.

[–] Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world 17 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Kissin cousins has always been a thing.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 13 points 10 months ago

Erotic fan-fic at its finest.

[–] schizolol9@lemy.lol 11 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Reminds me of the time I fucked my cousin a few times. She moved I now miss her.

load more comments
view more: next ›