this post was submitted on 13 Dec 2024
337 points (96.2% liked)

Antiwork

4246 readers
23 users here now

Date Created: June 21, 2023

This community supports labor, with an aspiration for it to cease to be required to live our lives. Members of this community want to end work, are curious about ending work, want to get the most out of a work-free life, want more information on anti-work ideas and/or want personal help with their own jobs/work-related struggles.

Anti-Work Library 📚
Essential Reads

Start here! Some of the more talked-about essays on the topic.

c/Antiwork Rules

Tap or click to expand

1. Server Main Rules


The main rules of the server will be enforced stringently. https://lemmy.world/


2. No spam or reposts + limit off topic comments


Spamming posts will be removed. Reposts will be removed with the exception of a repost becoming the main hub for discussion on that topic.

Off topic comments that do not pertain to the post at hand may be removed if it is deemed they contribute nothing and/or foster hostility at users. This mostly applies to political and religious debate, but can be applied to other things at the mod’s discretion.


3. Post must have Antiwork/ Work Reform explicitly involved


Post must have Antiwork/Work Reform explicitly involved in some capacity. This can be talking about antiwork, work reform, laws, and ext.


4. Educate don’t attack


No mocking, demeaning, flamebaiting, purposeful antagonizing, trolling, hateful language, false accusation or allegation, or backseat moderating is allowed. Don’t resort to ad hominem attacks against another user or insult other people, examples of violations would be going after the person rather than the stance they take.

If we feel the comment is uncalled for we will remove it. Stay civil and there won’t be problems.


5. No Advertising


Under no circumstance are you allowed to promote or advertise any product or service


6. No factually misleading information


Content that makes claims or implications that can be proven false or misleading will be removed.


7. Headlines


If the title of the post isn’t an original title of the article then the first thing in the body of the post should be an original title written in this format “Original title: {title here}”.


8. Staff Discretion


Staff can take disciplinary action on offenses not listed in the rules when a community member's actions or general conduct creates a negative experience for another player and/or the community.

It is impossible to list every example or variation of the rules. It is also impossible to word everything perfectly. Players are expected to understand the intent of the rules and not attempt to "toe the line" or use loopholes to get around the intent of the rule.


9. No posting links to Twitter/X or Meta owned properties


Social Media products such as Twitter/X and Meta Properties (e.g. Facebook, Instagram, Threads) are known low quality information sources - they actively spread misinformation without sufficient moderation, hate speech. These platforms each have billionaire owners working actively to eliminate labor protections through direct action, lobbying, performative large scale layoffs and attacks on institutions that enforce labor law.

You are not encouraged to do so, but you may post screenshots from these sites IF THE INFORMATION IS NOT AVAILABLE ON ANOTHER VALID PLATFORM. Screenshots must include info to support a relevant conversation within this community and must show a VISIBLE time/date stamp for posterity. If you are caught manipulating content of a screenshot, your post will be removed and you will receive an indefinite ban from this community at the discretion of the moderator(s)

No pass through/archive services are allowed as they potentially feed traffic back to these services, directly or indirectly (e.g. Services like Xcancel or Nitter)



Antiwork Suggested Communities

c/workreform@lemmy.world


Server status for big servers http://lemmy-status.org/

Active stats from all Antiwork instances

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A couple of slices:

Extreme wealth disparity is not due to a lack of taxes, but rather a lack of competition. In a competitive market, profit margins are quite low. If any one company tries to set its prices much higher than the cost of production, rivals quickly undercut it. Unfortunately, large parts of our economy are blocked off from competition by laws and regulations. This allows monopolistic corporations to charge exorbitant prices.

...

Therefore, it is important to understand how billionaires create and maintain these monopolies that allow them to amass such unfathomable riches.

And:

A lack of competition allows billionaires and their corporations to not make, but take wealth from everyone else. It is not enough to merely tax them on their ill-gotten gains. We need reforms to ensure that they can’t exploit and fleece everyone in the first place.

Do read the whole thing.

If you enjoyed this article, please check out the other articles on my website and subscribe to receive future ones.

top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Nougat@fedia.io 60 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Unfortunately, large parts of our economy are blocked off from competition by laws and regulations. This allows monopolistic corporations to charge exorbitant prices.

No, no, no, no. No. This is libertarian bullshit. Laws and regulations ideally force a fair playing field, and ensure consumer safety. Take away regulation, and "whoever is most unethical" scoops up mad profits until and if consumers catch on to the scam.

But even regulation can't make a fair playing field when the market is dominated by megacorporations who have the economic power to prevent any new competition from challenging them, unless that new competition already has huge economic power itself.

The problem isn't the lack of competition. The problem is capitalism.

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Read the article again. The author was pointing out intellectual property allows corporations to extract monopoly rent from society.

These laws like patents, trademarks, and copyrights have allowed big business to dominate our economic system.

Worse than this they use intellectual property to lockup and control our very culture that they have created through exploiting workers.

It is an extreme imbalance and perversion of the way science and arts have existed for thousands of years.

[–] bouh@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

The article advocate for a libertarian world. Getting rid of parents and copyright is good, imagining that competition will bring a better world is plain stupid though. It is precisely the libertarian ideal. And it only lead to neo-feudalism.

[–] JairajDevadiga@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Read the article again.

I don't think they read it even the first time around.

[–] H4CK3RN4M3D4N63R570RM@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Is it possible they imply the WRONG laws and regulations are being made? We obviously still need law but when these rules make it impossible to stop monopolistic behavior, they need to be changed. Laws and regulations can instead be used to encourage competition and smaller businesses. Personally, I believe it should be much harder to maintain a huge corporation than a smaller company.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 1 points 2 months ago

I’m not putting words in anyone’s mouth.

[–] JairajDevadiga@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Yes. Nobody is saying that there should be no laws and regulations (not even the libertarians). What I am saying is that the current laws enable the rich to create and maintain monopolies and line their pockets at the expense of everyone else.

[–] BlackLaZoR@fedia.io 1 points 2 months ago

No, no, no, no. No. This is libertarian bullshit

It isn't bullshit, but there's a lot of nuance missing. Majority of the economy works efficiently (aka low margins) based on this principle, but there are corner cases - particularly services with strong network effects that cause single provider to dominate the market

[–] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 15 points 2 months ago

The income imbalance is only a side effect of power imbalance.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 13 points 2 months ago

Rather than breaking up monopolies that will only ever reform themselves eventually, it makes more sense to fold them into the Public Sector, whereby their existing planning infrastructure can be better put to use in a more efficient manner. We need to move the clock forwards, not keep setting it back.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 12 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Billionaires and corporations should be taxed at 93% or more.

[–] IndiBrony@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Tax as it stands wouldn't do shit, sadly. Billionaires already know how to dodge taxes to begin with. We need to close loopholes to force them to pay the tax they're supposed to pay in the first place. That in itself would go a long way.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 5 points 2 months ago

We can do both.

[–] rdca@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Loopholes aren’t bugs but features! In a capitalist society, the laws are made by the wealthy and the ones they sponsor to be representatives!

[–] bouh@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

You can make taxes they can't avoid. And should they leave, the better a country doesn't thrive because of its billionaires but despite them.

[–] metaStatic@kbin.earth 7 points 2 months ago (3 children)

When someone wins at monopoly we pack away the pieces.

it is in their best interest to continue playing a game they have already won but we don't have to keep playing.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Hear me out - Monopoly variant with combat mechanics.

[–] metaStatic@kbin.earth 5 points 2 months ago

This is already a PvP server

[–] SouthEndSunset@lemm.ee 3 points 2 months ago

Did you know Monopoly was invented to show the evils of capitalism?

[–] bouh@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

While I agree patent and copyright are cancer, this article reads like libertarian bullshit.

[–] Mango@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Killing them seems to do that, and it's very cost effective. It's affordable and achievable for everyone.

[–] stq9@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

I agree with the sentiment and the message but the numbers in the article are off.

It states:
"The five richest people alone more than doubled their wealth from $405 billion to $869 billion since 2020."

The five richest people are now collectively worth 1,289 billion or 1.289 trillion

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

I hate authoritarianism of China, but they are on to something being so unhesitant to imprison and even execute billionaires.

I don't know how authoritarian Vietnam is, but they also do not hesitate to prosecute billionaires.