this post was submitted on 18 Jan 2025
498 points (98.6% liked)

Memes

47169 readers
1360 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 39 points 1 month ago

They don't want to protect, they want exclusivity.

[–] Hirom@beehaw.org 18 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 month ago

Chinese companies are in a catch 22 in Europe because Chinese law is completely incompatible with EU privacy laws.

And American companies are one executive order away from being in the same situation.

[–] AceTKen@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

Err... Not to throw a wrench into things but, yeah. They kinda sorta did.

https://lemmy.world/post/24407357

[–] doomcanoe@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 month ago

"Kinda sorta" is definitely the best way to put it.

[–] rangeCheck@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago

security is totally different from privacy

[–] Midnitte@beehaw.org 2 points 1 month ago

Executive order isn't a law though.

That EO is also focused on commercial security, not citizen privacy:

The sweeping directive, signed Thursday, covers a range of topics including securing federal communications networks against foreign snoops, issuing tougher sanctions for ransomware gangs, requiring software providers to develop more secure products, and using AI to boost America's cyber defense capabilities, among others.

[–] macattack@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

I think the issue is that TiKtok is just as bad as all the other social media and they are owned by a foreign adversary.

Foreign adversaries (ie China, Russia and America) use social media for influence campaigns on each other and therefore their social media platforms can't be trusted. This is why Chinese people similarly can't use Google or Facebook

[–] davel@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Good job, this is exactly the understanding and framing that the Council on Foreign Relations wants you to have 💯

[–] Funkytom467@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I'm out of the loop what's the council for and why would they want people to think that? What's in it for them?

[–] davel@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

These are very good questions. What is the Council on Foreign Relations and what are its goals & motivations?

These are questions on the path toward developing real media literacy.

[–] Funkytom467@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Maybe I should say I'm not in the US. Media literacy isn't brand new to me. But the CFR was completely foreign (pun intended), there isn't quite anything like it where I live.

Although the propaganda model of Herman and Chromsky quoted in your link is very much a mirror of our media too. (Most notably in our television network, own by a single group)

If I understood properly that was the point of your sarcastic comment on the CFR right?

[–] davel@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 month ago

Yes, the CFR is a major coordination org between the Atlanticist corporations, governments, and NGOs, with the US leading, as it does.

[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 month ago

But China is not part of 14 eyes. So for citizens it is better that China has it than their own government.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago

Russia does that without (US-)foreign social media. Same difference.