Boo

If they fall i'd say that is good.

Zionism is a political, legal, moral, economical and social liability. If they won't stop supporting it, because that is the legal and moral thing to do, then they need to suffer consequences that make them stop supporting Zionism.

Like I have sugary coffee almost every day but I wouldn’t say I’m addicted because I’m not experiencing any negative consequences from it.

How would you feel/do, when there is a stressful day and you cannot have your coffee?

As for pot, i have met and been a daily smoker for many years. Everybody i knew that smoked daily had some social or personal issues and it definitely affected their ability to focus, memory and emotional awareness negatively.

I don't think that daily use of psychoactives can go without addiction. It can be beneficial as medication for some, but there will be side effects and withdrawal symptoms, like with non psychoactive medication too.

Thank you. I will check them out.

Thank you for the tips. I recently joined a sports club and it is nice to have a shared hobby as an anchor for social interactions.

I will look into the autistic burnout. I think that could be a risk factor for me. I work in project management in an engineer context.

Thank you. I will check it out.

Fair point.

Thank you.

Thank you.

The world if half of the accusations of reactionaries, neoliberals and other fascists against moderate and actual progressives were true:

Jews lived mostly peaceful and Jewish communities were often thriving in Muslim majority countries. Things usually got bad when the "white European" Christians came, like during the crusades or the conquest of the Iberian peninsula. The same people whose descendants now want to blame their Antisemitism on Muslims and solve their Antisemitism by having "the Jews" live outside of their European home countries.

I think we can trust everyone involved to know exactly what the question meant and what the reply means.

If he would think in your categories he could have answered something like "I would be happy if it wouldn't be needed." Or reply back with "In which context?" or something.

He immediately jumped to making it "its either tanks or holocaust for us."

The ICJ is a court and as such slow. As for statements showing intent, there is a plethora of statements, from comparing Palestinians to biblical "Amalek" (Netanyahu), over saying it is "unfortunate" that the world won't let Israel just starve all people in Gaza to death (Ben Gvir) to public broadcast employees saying they want to commit another Holocaust in Gaza.