I eventually plan to watch it, but I usually try to avoid watching things until they are finished to know if they just rapidly gave the thing a bad end or if it has a satisfying conclusion.
Also because if there is a long time between seasons, Ill forget the story line.
I tried to use OpenSUSE tumbleweed for about 6 months as my main desktop, but eventually due to many of the things I wanted to do being a real pain to do in linux, said fuck it and went back to windows whilst building a new high end gaming rig.
It really sucks as I hate Microsoft with a burning passion, but if you want to play games, or use many CAD packages or make music, or watch videos (specifically with pot player for me, as it absolutely dunks on VLC unfortunately), then you just have to use Windows.
I haaaaaate the obvious attempts by the new taskbar to control user behaviour.
I hate the spying which it takes a while to turn most of it off, I hate... a lot, but the world is how it is.
I'm very thankful for Steamdecks gaining steam so that one day hopefully gaming on linux will be possible, and maybe adoption goes up and then maybe other apps follow.
Maybe the US collapse will have Europe mass switching, causing professional apps to also move over, especially CAD.
I think they're almost kinda right.
I think these platforms need to adapt. They need to make short form, entertaining videos like The Washington Post or the break off with Dave Jorgenson called Local News International.
There is too much news for anyone to actually bother reading the long form articles that theyre used to having awfully agitating formats designed to get the reader to read the whole thing and scroll past ads.
Short form, entertaining, and factual is the best route. Do a little skit, explain the concept simply, bingo bango.
Absolutely agree. A youtube video where you can mostly ignore what theyre saying and just see the game and problems with it along with some benchmarks is all you need.
If its online, watching someone play online to get a feeling of how the community is also works, particularly if its just them playing solo for a long stretch of time not editing out toxicity.
I've never remembered seeing quality video games journalism.
The tyypes that they're describing as that always seemed hacky and liable to push very subjective opinions as facts.
Their scores almost always seemed wonky and part of that is probably because individual scores for something as complex as a game don't really make sense. They rarely make sense for anything.
Instead what you want are scores in multiple areas with no single amalgamated score.
Anyhow, for the longest while video games journalism has been rife with controversy about pulling negative reviews for ad deals etc.
I think unfortunately written media is pretty much dying due to finances, and for video games, due to never being all that good in the first place.
The details I care about, like monetization, grind, and performance, are the details that most games journalists just completely skim over or they'll glaze game companies while they perform awfully here.
My way of buying games is basically watching video reviews of someone playing and mostly ignoring their commentary to figure out those details for myself.
That and benchmarks of course.... and figuring out whether they're owned by the saudi government....
Anyways, yea, video content for games both makes more sense, and more money.
I can totally get this feeling for PC/consumer electronics hardware related articles and reviews, but for video games? Meh. I won't cry.
I think Europeans have a chance, and Canadians would have so many chances with so many things if we just got proportional representation, but that'll happen when Pierre Poilievre stops being a racist alcoholic aka when pigs fly.
It truly is absurd to see Germany slowly slipping backwards.
Once the US breaks, all hell will probably break lose in Germany, especially since Im imagining a lot of countries will be trying to make concessions to appease full blown fascist US.
Russia is losing a war, but ultimately it seems they're going to win, not through weapons, but corruption.
Fitting for Russia really.
Mildly disappointed that they are releasing episodically.
Also disappointed that they isn't a rewind feature in case you miss dialog lines. Felt like a pretty big exclusion when I played the demo.
Still bought it and plan to play it since I love this alt superhero meta that is going on what with the boys (though the last seasons sucked), and with Invincible (which is also starting to head down the drain).
I just love the lack of hollywood morality where the good guy doesnt kill, and the superheros don't really have meaningful personal difficulties or problems.
Let Activision come check up on us and cry because for all their efforts no one even cares to hate on their game.
The reality is that we are on a relatively small decentralized reddit clone.
We truly are the most exceptional exceptions.
Most people cant even begin to think of caring about what we care about.
Activision certainly doesnt.
And they don't understand why people pirate, run away from AAA games and go for indie games instead.
They completely understand... the numbers saying that they're making money hand over fist and the number of people who care is sadly minuscule.
These games have hit a critical mass where people will casually buy them because they're friends are and so its a common ground game to play with buddies.
I don't think we can ever rely on consumers pushing back on anti consumer practises because of the reality of people.
Not everyone can afford to care about every issue.
As a result, boycotts are very unlikely to work in the modern world. There is just too much all at once for any one person to care about all of them, so even if you, lets say, care about 1% (a really high estimate) of things that are wrong in the world, and are willing to act, if we extrapolated that out to the whole population, the only things that would move would need to have double digit percentages of peoples care overlapping before anything stuck.
Really, the answer is that you simply need a government that cares about its people/consumer rights.
The USA and Canada, both are very far away from having governments like that.
Europeans are a lot luckier, but yet still, there is plenty to go.
At the same time, easier, in that there is a lot less toxicity and bots targeting the lemmyverse
Like recently, I found a reddit thread that had a pretty obviously racist meme.
It was extremely highly upvoted, but something really felt uncanny about it, because I know racism is ramping up, but this was too blunt to feel natural to me.
Then, so many comments defending the racism were there it was odd.
That's when I decided to look into the profiles of these comments and 9/10 of them were a year old or less, with very few comments or completely hidden profiles.
It was one of the most blatant bot/troll farm attacks I've ever seen and kinda shocked me.
All of there comments seemed very humanly written, but the account ages being all similar was too big a tell for me to think it was organic.
Basically, I think we're cooked if people keep using centralized websites and or if we dont have a way to figure out what is genuine from what isn't.
The average person goes with the flow and doesn't think too hard about things. If through trolls or bots a country, nation state or group of billionaires can change what appears to be public opinion, we're fucked.
Understandable. I just feel like amalgamated scores tend not to truly reflect the subjective opinions of the reviewer as sometimes games are more or less than the sum of their parts, and then it doesn't represent anything close to objectivity because it ignores that different people value different things more or less than others, therefore making this score not all that useful for them.
I can completely understand just wanting a quick score at a glance from a favourite review or outlet though.