FreedomAdvocate

joined 2 weeks ago
[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au -2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (5 children)

Bluesky blocked his account in turkey btw, just like X did. Bluesky have made no mention of challenging the legal request in court like X have though.

Iirc the Brazil situation was the first time anything like this had happened since Musk bought Twitter. They definitely didn’t handle it correctly, but they’ve clearly learned since then. Now they comply with legal requests and challenge them through the courts. Would you prefer they just folded every time and didn’t challenge, like all the others? Like Bluesky?

Good work on calling me a nazi though! I did nazi that coming!!

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au -1 points 3 days ago

I don’t care when people who call everyone Nazis for daring to think illegal immigrants should be deported, for example, call me a Nazi. No skin off my back. In fact it’s a good thing, as it just turns more and more people away from the far left. This behaviour is the main reason why the democrats were blown off the map in the presidential election. Normal people have just had enough of the far lefts never ending name calling and bullshit. The more you do it the worse you look, so keep going :)

🤣 I like how you guys think people care when you call them fascists, Nazis, etc.

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au -3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

The “recalls” have all apart from 1, iirc (the accelerator pedal cover), been delivered via OTA software updates. Calling them “recalls” in the first place is a bit silly since they’re not actually recalled.

Many panels in many cars are “glued” on btw. Calling it “glue” is disingenuous too, attempting to make out like it’s not a specific panel bonding adhesive that is used all over the car industry.

I’m assuming you’re talking about the JerryRigEverything video with your “risk testing it apart” comment, right? That was, for lack of a more correct term, complete horseshit. The “test” was “rigged” in a way that it made it seem like it failed when in fact it passed with flying colours, lasting like 10x the quoted force. There’s no real world situation where that failure would happen, because the test exerts pressure in a way that can’t happen in any regular situation a truck can be in.

One thing I don’t think anyone can claim is that the cyber truck has worse performance than its competitors. It’s basically a supercar in terms of performance lol.

I agree the car market is in a great place in terms of build quality and features even on low spec cars, but the Cybertruck still isn’t “one of the worst products in recent memory”, not even close.

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au -4 points 4 days ago (10 children)

3 motors use more power than 2, so less range is expected. A car with 2 engines would use more petrol than a car with only 1.

Why? More power…..

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au -4 points 4 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (4 children)

What are you basing that extreme statement on? It seems to be far from a bad product, let alone “one of the worst products in recent history”.

Preorder interest probably made it not worth it financially.

view more: ‹ prev next ›