FreedomAdvocate

joined 3 weeks ago
[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au -5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

So you’re talking morally? Sorry but that’s not even worth discussing here.

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au -4 points 1 week ago

But they didn’t use it for any of those purposes. Training an AI model isn’t doing any of that. Which do you think they did specifically?

Humans can learn from any copyrighted material they want to. Copyright doesn’t, and can’t, prevent that.

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au -2 points 1 week ago

And I don’t care :)

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au -4 points 1 week ago

Looks like the article was updated to change from “trying to” to “considering” lol. Seems even their editors agree with me.

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au -4 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Which ones did they know were legal but grabbed them anyway?

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au -2 points 1 week ago (4 children)

That’s not what AI is doing though. A better analogy using your book example would be learning a book by heart, then going and writing a new book in that same style.

Is that illegal? No.

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au -4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Randomly generated. Go to Google and type randomly generated username and have at it.

Keep your conspiracy theories plausible. You’re failing.

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The underlying technology I am talking about.

view more: ‹ prev next ›