But they didn’t use it for any of those purposes. Training an AI model isn’t doing any of that. Which do you think they did specifically?
Humans can learn from any copyrighted material they want to. Copyright doesn’t, and can’t, prevent that.
But they didn’t use it for any of those purposes. Training an AI model isn’t doing any of that. Which do you think they did specifically?
Humans can learn from any copyrighted material they want to. Copyright doesn’t, and can’t, prevent that.
And I don’t care :)
Looks like the article was updated to change from “trying to” to “considering” lol. Seems even their editors agree with me.
Which ones did they know were legal but grabbed them anyway?
That’s not what AI is doing though. A better analogy using your book example would be learning a book by heart, then going and writing a new book in that same style.
Is that illegal? No.
Randomly generated. Go to Google and type randomly generated username and have at it.
Keep your conspiracy theories plausible. You’re failing.
The underlying technology I am talking about.
So you’re talking morally? Sorry but that’s not even worth discussing here.