GenericUsername

joined 2 years ago
224
rule (feddit.de)
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by GenericUsername@feddit.de to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone
 
 
139
rule (feddit.de)
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by GenericUsername@feddit.de to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone
172
rule (feddit.de)
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by GenericUsername@feddit.de to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone
[–] GenericUsername@feddit.de 3 points 2 years ago

SpongeBOZZ rule

[–] GenericUsername@feddit.de 1 points 2 years ago

Danke! Ü

Ja mei, Alphastadium eben :D

[–] GenericUsername@feddit.de 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

Edit: Gefixed. Lass den Rest zur Info stehen.

~~Vorsicht - Link im Kommentar bringt Jerboa zum Abschmieren~~!

Das Markdown ist:

[src]((https://old.reddit.com/r/de/comments/14d4a5h/blackout_megafeedbackfaden_001/jook11u/))

Müsste aber

[src](https://old.reddit.com/r/de/comments/14d4a5h/blackout_megafeedbackfaden_001/jook11u/)

sein:

src

Falls du das korrigieren könntest, bevor es einem anderen armen Schwein die App abwürgt ;_;

 
[–] GenericUsername@feddit.de 3 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Over 800 million monthly users, really? :D

[–] GenericUsername@feddit.de 1 points 2 years ago

What has Bert ever done to you? T_T

 
[–] GenericUsername@feddit.de 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

URL shorteners are generally blocked and for good reason.

How so? I can get bit.ly being blocked in general as it's commonly known but emol.ink for example is not. For all an unsuspecting reader knows that (emol.ink) could be an alternative to emojipedia.

Can any URL shortener be detected by Automod automatically with technical means, by checking for permanent redirects e.g.?

Or is some poor fella forced to maintain a static list of know URL shorteners the Automod uses? :D

[–] GenericUsername@feddit.de 8 points 2 years ago

:3

:3

:3

:3

:3
:3
 
[–] GenericUsername@feddit.de 1 points 2 years ago

Cool, dann spare ich mir die Arbeit Ü

Und ja ... WTF in der Tat.

[–] GenericUsername@feddit.de 4 points 2 years ago (3 children)
[–] GenericUsername@feddit.de 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

That money's going to Mozila tho (or the Mozilla foundation or something, I never get the exact details right without looking up).

Anyway, the point is it will not be used to fund Firefox development if that is where you intend it to go. Can't, for legal reasons or other bs.

Probably no harm in donating whatsover, they do other great stuff aswell, just YSK.

[–] GenericUsername@feddit.de 1 points 2 years ago

but man, whatever happened to editorial review?

🖐️😲💨 Poof

1
I rule (feddit.de)
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by GenericUsername@feddit.de to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone
 
6
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by GenericUsername@feddit.de to c/europe@lemmy.ml
 

To quote the article's introduction:

The End of the Privacy of Digital Correspondence

The EU Commission proposes to oblige providers to search all private chats, messages, and emails automatically for suspicious content – generally and indiscriminately. The stated aim: To prosecute child sexual exploitation material (CSEM). The result: Mass surveillance by means of fully automated real-time surveillance of messaging and chats and the end of privacy of digital correspondence.

Other aspects of the proposal include ineffective network blocking, screening of personal cloud storage including private photos, mandatory age verification resulting in the end of anonymous communication, appstore censorship and excluding minors from the digital world.

Post edited 2023-06-14 to insert the quote. I did not notice the auto-generated body before.

view more: next ›