Routhinator

joined 2 years ago
[–] Routhinator@startrek.website 0 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I'm not trolling. This is simply not an illusion.

[–] Routhinator@startrek.website 0 points 15 hours ago

Ok those rooms are certainly illusions. My mind was tricked and even after reading how they work I still cannot quite see how when I watch the video. A perfect illusion.

I still wouldn't call the post for this thread an illusion as there is no trick, just pure perspective. You simply tilt your phone, you see what is happening, and you understand it because its basic physics you were taught in elementary.

This is like the amateur magician. A trickster that knows a few party tricks but is so bad at executing them they are no illusionist. But a master magician uses simple things like perspective and skill to create tricks that are such great illusions that the scientific mind cannot quite work out what has really just happened even though they know it's a trick. This post is the amateur magician, the Ames room is the master. Both use perspective but in different ways on different levels.

[–] Routhinator@startrek.website 0 points 16 hours ago (3 children)

There is nothing erroneous about this perception.

[–] Routhinator@startrek.website 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

I have no context for this example, have a link? I've seen the crazy kitchen at the Museum of Science and Tech in Ottawa that has a similarly themed illusion, but in that one the floors are level but painted in a way that tricks your brain into thinking its angled, but its not, which is 100% illusion.

Thus what I am imagining for your example is that the floor is in fact angled, but the paint makes it look straight, so the short person is infact elevated above the tall person in a way you cannot tell, creating an effect where perspective due to a physical difference makes you think they are on the same level but the illusion provided by the floor messes with that, creating an illusion that is really just perspective.

But there is no trick in this post. You know you're tilting the phone, there's no illusion. Its pure angles and you're completely aware of what is occuring, thus no illusion. The definition of illusion is pretty clear, what you are seeing must be false or erroneous.

noun

  1. An erroneous perception of reality.

    "Mirrors gave the illusion of spaciousness."

  2. An erroneous concept or belief.

    "The notion that money can buy happiness is an illusion."

  3. The condition of being deceived by a false perception or belief.

    "spent months flailing about in illusion."

Haha, ok I can agree with that take.

[–] Routhinator@startrek.website 0 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Illusion is seeing something that isn't there. They can be caused by multiple factors be it one affecting the observer or one that arises from the subject being observed.

This demonstrates perspective and at no point do you see something that is not there. The text is there, it says the same thing. It does not appear to move or distort but rather as you tilt the phone the same light is viewed from a narrower height due to angles and it can be read as though it is not stretched.

An optical illusion makes you see something that simply does not exist, for example this picture that makes you think you see red in spite of there being jo red at all. https://www.popularmechanics.com/science/a25494/theres-not-a-single-red-pixel-in-this-image/

[–] Routhinator@startrek.website 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (14 children)

Is perspective really considered an "illusion"? While this demonstrates perspective it at no point makes me see something that isn't real.

[–] Routhinator@startrek.website 10 points 2 days ago

Squid or Cthulu Snail?

[–] Routhinator@startrek.website 7 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Super hard to order in Canada unless you find an american distributor, which defeats the point.

[–] Routhinator@startrek.website 1 points 4 days ago (2 children)

You forgot Tubgirl

 

So much food.

 

Title says it all. He sells Scrooge better than any other movie adaptation I've seen.

 

As the title says, I'm curious if they ever named or revisited this Human civilization in the later parts of the timeline in any way? It seems like too good of an opportunity to not revisit it at some point.

My searches did not reveal any answer, so thought I'd ask my fellow trek nerds.

-43
submitted 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) by Routhinator@startrek.website to c/politics@lemmy.world
 

This is the most unfiltered article I've read from The Atlantic... by the time I finished the second paragraph I had to re-read the title to understand how I got here.

Edit: To be clear, this has been revealed as satire, its just so close to reality one could be forgiven for confusing the two.

view more: next ›