I understand that. It's the downvoting of the clearly marked as AI LLM response. Is it detrimental to the conversation here to have that? Is it better to share nothing rather than this LLM output?
Was this thread better without it?
Is complete ignorance of the PNG compatibility preferable to reading this AI output and pondering how true is it?
[list 200 links]
Now I think this conversation is getting just rude for no reason. I think the AI output was definitely not the "I'm lucky" result of a Google search and the fact that you choose that metaphor is in bad faith.
I did check some of the references.
What I dont understand is why you would perceive this content as more trustworthy if I didn't say it's AI.
Nobody should trust blindly some anonymous comment on a forum. I have to check what the AI blurbs out but you can just gobble the comment of some stranger without exercising yourself some critical thinking?
As long as I'm transparent on the source and especially since I did check some of it to be sure it's not some kind of hallucination...
There shouldn't be any difference of trust between some random comment on a social network and what some AI model thinks on a subject.
Also it's not like this is some important topic with societal implications. It's just a technical question that I had (and still doesn't) that doesn't mandate researching. None of my work depends on that lib. So before my comment there was no information on compatibility. Now there is but you have to look at it critically and decide if you want to verify or trust it.
That's why I regret this kind of stubborn downvoting where people just assume the worse instead of checking the actual data.
Sometime I really wonder if I'm the only one supposed to check my data? Aren't everybody here capable of verifying the AI output if they think it's worth the time and effort?
Basically, downvoting here is choosing "no information" rather than "information I have to verify because it's AI generated".
Edit: Also I could have just summarized the AI output myself and not mention AI. What then? Would you have checked the accuracy of that data? Critical thinking is not something you use "sometimes" or just "on some comments".
To be clear... If you have already signed, thank you but do not sign again.
(I know that's not what you wanted to say, I just want to make sure it's not misunderstood).
I'm not sure.
If I was him I suppose I would want to get revenge by getting to be their boss and firing them or training them until they change their behavior.
I think the solution is pretty straightforward you have to get rid of the racist/corrupt cops it's not like a stern word will change people like Williams (the cop that kept on getting fired and reinstated).
So I dont think he is forgiving anybody here. He is on a mission to eliminate the issue from the top. And when it comes to mafia like structures like in Boston the only person that can effectively deconstruct that is at the very top of the hierarchy.
At least that's what I'm hoping for. Also I thought the person that elected him is known to be fighting against police brutality and racism.
As you can see it's irrelevant apparently. If it's AI generated it will be downvoted.
Forgiving or trying to fix a corruption problem from the top?
I have signed the petition but wasn't ever asked for an ID.
So in countries like mine (FR) how are they gonna check my signature?
How are those surprlus "solving world hunger"?
There is nothing really saying that in the wikipedia page. Just because a country has surplus at one point doesn't mean it will fill the belly of someone at the other side of the world.
Sorry but this seems like a massive simplification.
24135 would result in an incomplete star...
Je dois temporairement tolérer d'utiliser YouTube sans aucun filtrage de pub et je dois dire que je ne m'attendais pas que ce soit la m**** à ce point là.
Apparemment c'est une arnaque assez classique qui existe depuis début 2024.
Jamel n'a pas été arrêté et tout est faux sur cette image.
Au moins c'est "drôle" de voir que cette image générée par AI montre Jamel avec son bras tout neuf...
A noter le logo du Monde histoire de donner une certaine crédibilité à l'annonce.
En particulier pendant qu'elle essaie de passer un texte sur la haine en ligne...