ZDL

joined 1 week ago
[–] ZDL@lazysoci.al 14 points 1 hour ago

Yes. If you change all the terms of the thought experiment the outcome is different.

What an unexpected result!

[–] ZDL@lazysoci.al 11 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

It is truly amazing to me how few people understand even the elementary aspects of risk management.

A known danger is easier to manage than an unknown one.

Bears are dangerous, but largely predictable. They usually don't go after humans at all (and indeed usually go the other direction). And if they seem angry, there's simple things you can do (it rhymes with "back away slowly" because identical rhymes are still rhymes) that will defuse the situation almost immediately.

Men are for the most part decent human beings. Most men you meet will not be monsters. The problem is that there's really no way to distinguish the monsters from the decent men until it's way too late. And extricating yourself from an interaction with a strange man in the forest is not as straightforward as it is for a bear. Backing away slowly might work, or it might trigger that silicon chip inside their brain and slip it to "overload" and make them get angry that you don't trust them. And the penalty for making a bad choice is serious bodily harm as the good outcome. There are worse ones after that.

So just from straightforward risk assessment it's better to meet a bear in the woods than a strange man. Because a bear is more predictable and easier to manage.

 

Text:

Panel 1 Man and woman in office clothes in a break room.

Man: So, if you were alone in a forest, would you rather run into a strange man… or a bear?

Panel 2 Woman: Oh, hmm… I think the bear.

Man (angry): How can you say that?

(Bear looking quizzically through the window)

Panel 3 Man (angry): You're demonizing men! It's misandry!

Panel 4 Woman: Good point. Why would I ever hear men's reactions?

Man: Exactly! …where did the honey go?

Panel 5 Woman and bear sharing tea

Woman: At least if you maul me, pepper won't say I made it up or I'm misinterpreting.

Bear: I hear you

[–] ZDL@lazysoci.al 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I thought Edmonton was my home. All my conscious life I was in Edmonton. (I'd actually moved there from Germany at the age of 18 months but of course have no memory of this.)

Then in 1975 I had all that torn away. The tender roots I'd been forming, ripped out of me. I spent the next decade or so of my life bouncing around both inside and outside of Canada.

I have no hometown now. Nowhere that I can return to. My family is scattered across three continents and I hardly ever see any of them.

That's the bad side.

The good side is that I'm very independent. Kidnap me and drop me off blind-folded anywhere in the world and I'll make a place for myself.

[–] ZDL@lazysoci.al 0 points 12 hours ago (1 children)
[–] ZDL@lazysoci.al 1 points 12 hours ago

Orchestrate Nazis? Musk's Empty Lies Orchestrate Nazis? MELON?

[–] ZDL@lazysoci.al 1 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

I've been working on something to spell out MELON. So far I've got Musk's Empty Lies, but I can't find anything yet for the ON part. Still working.

[–] ZDL@lazysoci.al 0 points 12 hours ago (1 children)
[–] ZDL@lazysoci.al 0 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Incombustible.

[–] ZDL@lazysoci.al 0 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

(ahem Inflammable and flammable mean the same thing.)

[–] ZDL@lazysoci.al 7 points 12 hours ago

It's even funnier when MGTOW does it. MGTOW is supposed to mean "Men Going Their Own Way" but for people "going their own way" they seem to spend a lot of time stalking anywhere that women gather so they can whine about how badly women treat men.

Men Getting Triggered Over Women seems to be a better backronym.

[–] ZDL@lazysoci.al 15 points 12 hours ago

Yes it's what you think it is. I don't think, however, that there is anywhere to report it that will care enough to do something about it.

[–] ZDL@lazysoci.al 0 points 1 day ago (3 children)
 

I've found my Halloween getup (presuming I can get it in my size!):

A mannequin displays an elaborate gothic-inspired outfit set against a shimmering silver tinsel backdrop. The ensemble features a deep red, faux leather corset adorned with black spikes at chest level and silver grommets down the front, fastened at the bottom with metal clasps. The corset is paired with a matching ruched mini skirt made of a stretchy, semi-sheer mesh fabric, gathered with black eyelets and rings. Draped over the shoulders is a dramatic black satin and lace bolero with voluminous bell sleeves, trimmed with ruffled red chiffon. Accessories include a large silver rose pendant at the neck, layered black bead chains, a wide belt with a large metal O-ring, and an ankh charm. To the left, a black Christmas tree decorated with white skulls and silver tinsel adds to the dark, theatrical atmosphere.

view more: next ›