Prost! ๐ป
barubary
joined 2 years ago
C) It's an obvious joke.
s/diplomated/graduate/
s/branche/industry (sector)/
Isn't that how B worked?
Similarly, Perl lets you say
my $ret = do { if (...) { ... } else { ... }};
To be fair, the C example could be detangled a lot by introducing a typedef:
typedef int Callback_t(int, int);Callback_t *(*fp)(Callback_t *, int);
Both of those declarations look weird to me. In Haskell it would be:
a :: Stringbob :: (String, Int, Double) -> [String]bob (a, b, c) = ...
... except that makes bob a function taking a tuple and it's much more idiomatic to curry it instead:
bob :: String -> Int -> Double -> [String]bob a b c = ...-- syntactic sugar for:-- bob = \a -> \b -> \c -> ...
The [T] syntax also has a prefix form [] T, so [String] could also be written [] String.
OCaml makes the opposite choice. In OCaml, a list of strings would be written string list, and a set of lists of strings would be string list set, a list of lists of integers int list list, etc.
Because let x: y is syntactically unambiguous, but you need to know that y names a type in order to correctly parse y x. (Or at least that's the case in C where a(b) may be a variable declaration or a function call depending on what typedefs are in scope.)
include Hebrew in their language, because I guess they were feeling kabbalistic
... or because the developers were Israeli: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zend/_(company)#History
Do you know the difference between a script and a program?
A script is what you give the actors; a program is what you give the audience.
I don't understand the complaint. What exactly is the issue?
view more: next โบ
@devilish666 C++ (non-stupid):
#include <stdio.h>
int main() {
puts("Hello, world!");
}