boblin

joined 2 years ago
[–] boblin@infosec.pub 1 points 1 year ago

WASD = Path of Vampire Survivors?

[–] boblin@infosec.pub 11 points 1 year ago

The pun is so bad it made me sigh. Top quality dad joke!

[–] boblin@infosec.pub 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It was Arkanoid for me.

[–] boblin@infosec.pub 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Alley Cat, Dukem Nukem 3D, Ultima (4, 5, and 7), Daytona, Day of the Tentacle, Zack McCracken...

[–] boblin@infosec.pub 33 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's impossible, we know Anakin is Luke's dad and Obi-Wan told Luke that Vader killed him.

[–] boblin@infosec.pub 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

16 and below is unambiguous. It's a child up to and including 16 years old. Compare that to "below 17" for example, which technically means the same but might be confused to include 17 by someone skimming the question.

[–] boblin@infosec.pub 44 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't recall Reddit having unique content - what I do remember however was that it had aggregated content. It filled the role of Slashdot, Fark, and other sites, and it had a comment threading system that was far more usable. The memes came after.

[–] boblin@infosec.pub 5 points 1 year ago

That's s good trick.

[–] boblin@infosec.pub 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Legally it is quite clear. Taking a description of a closed source program and writing a new one is ok in most cases (unless that description is API docs - see Cisco vs Arista). Taking a look at closed source software and then implementing your own version is poison as far as OSS goes. OP implemented the first version, so that's already a problem. They may get away is they describe what the program does to someone else and let them implement it, but OP would not be able to touch the source code

[–] boblin@infosec.pub 1 points 1 year ago

If you can find a Portuguese translation of Borges' books that would be a good choice.

[–] boblin@infosec.pub 2 points 1 year ago

TL;DR: It's Prometheus, and he didn't call the whole film dumb, just a lot of its plot points.

[–] boblin@infosec.pub 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But Jaskier isn't gay in the show, either. He's bisexual.

Oh yeah, that completely changes things, and does completely fit in with the character.

I do have to admit that I did not watch the latest season, not because of Jaskier but because of what they did to Eskel in the previous season. So I took the other commenter's word that the character was made gay. I guess that's what I get for assuming honesty until proven differently on the Internet.

view more: ‹ prev next ›