Him being a hypocrite doesn't change anything.
If people boycott the company over his comments it's not like he benefits in any way.
Him being a hypocrite doesn't change anything.
If people boycott the company over his comments it's not like he benefits in any way.
Yea, I can fix a shitter if I have to.
You missing the point. People will do work when it is required whether or not they desire to do work. It doesn't require a magic job creator to get work done.
~~Or censor all words. Everybody shutting up would help a whole lot more than anything anyone could say.~~
Hitler died from suicide and Stalin from a stroke.
Kind of difficult to make that happen.
They'll want to clean the sewer when the sewer needs cleaning, the same way that you "want" to vacuum your home even if you don't want to do it.
Jeg kan ikke rigtigt se hvordan en AI skulle kunne lære at undgå den form for "poison pilling" I øjeblikket. Som jeg forstår det, så er det sådan, at når først der er kommet gift i kagen, så kan man ikke skille den ad og fjerne det.
Teoretisk set kan man nok lave et filter, men det er ikke den måde AI gør det på nu. Den analyserer slet ikke indholdet i kilden. Den starter med støj og skærer ud så det ligner det ønskede resultat udfra hvordan kilden ser ud, men den forholder sig ikke til om kilden er korrekt.
Hvis man nu alligevel gerne vil lave en AI som kan skrive musik nedefra og op, så er man nødt til at lære den andre færdigheder end blot at kopiere oppefra og ned. Algoritme-baseret musik kan sagtens laves uden AI så det lyder rigtigt og uden at det kopierer noget specifikt. Det kan også udgøre en trussel mod kunstnere, men så må de efter min mening spidse blyanten og lave noget som er nyt i stedet for selv at kopiere tidligere værker.
Musik er heldigvis meget skiftende og bliver hurtigt forældet. Det som fungerer som hits i dag vil lyde gammeldags i morgen. Det er jo kunsten i det: at skabe noget som er nyt.
Hvis man snakker økonomi, så er country og dansktop nok stadigvæk der hvor der tjenes flest penge, selvom det er samme formel hver gang, og dét kan AI selvfølgelig gøre mindst ligeså godt som menneske.
Hvis man gerne vil beskytte sin musik fra at blive brugt til AI learning, så er det muligt at indsætte en slags "vandmærke", som ikke kan høres, men som forhindrer AI i at lave et brugbart resultat af det.
Jeg tror ikke det er helt klart som en plugin endnu, og jeg har heller ikke selv forsøgt at gøre det, men denne video forklarer det: https://youtu.be/xMYm2d9bmEA
Ideen er nøjagtig den samme som benyttes til at beskytte billeder, for AI musik dannes på samme måde som AI billeder. Den starter med støj, og så filrerer den indtil det ligner det som er bedt om i prompten.
På et tidspunkt vil det nok blive en helt enkelt ting at gøre når man eksporterer sine lydfiler.
Don't be like me. As a hobby, I started making a music album some time around year 2003. During the next four years I accumulated several hundreds drafts and 16 nearly finished tracks, that only needed the final polish. Then I got stuck. I never did finish one single track.
I was stuck like that for almost ten years. It wasn't until 2016 that I decided to cut the finished tracks down to 7 and publish them as they were, just to close the book and get it out of my system.
I stopped doing music for some years and all the old drafts are archived on old hard drives somewhere in the basement. All I have to show is the published album. The ideas still exists in my head, and maybe I can use some of those, but I don't think any of the material is worth resurrecting to work on.
I finally feel free to start a new project. As a matter of fact, I just did that two weeks ago and finished the first track within the same week, of which the majority happened in a single night. Sure, there are things I think I could improve, but I have decided not to attempt it. It's done as it is. It's more important to move forward than to attempt to perfect something that can never be perfect.
Imagine if you actually managed to write the perfect ending. How the hell would you ever be able to write another book?
My advice would be to write two endings. Pick the least awful one and then publish it, so you can clear your head and start a new book.
I think it's Picard who doesn't know.
It's such a standard procedure that there's no need for the commanding officer to know the details.
Som én der heller ikke synes kemi er spændende, så synes jeg youtube kanalen Veritasium har haft alt for meget kemi på det seneste.
I følgende video forklarer de hele historien om hvorfor ukrudtsmidlet Roundup er noget lort, og så er det jo alligevel spændende:
The sand storage is used for district heating. It's not much of a substitute for single homes that have electrical heating or are off-grid.
It's a great way to balance both the electrical and the heating grids so that more electricity from renewables can be used to offset other means of heat production, but it needs to be done by the district heating supplier. I doubt it makes sense for individual houses.