flaviat

joined 1 month ago
sorted by: new top controversial old
Stubsack: weekly thread for sneers not worth an entire post, week ending 6th April 2025 in c/techtakes@awful.systems
[โ€“] flaviat@awful.systems 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

So "unintentional moderates" are those that both choose deliberately to believe in centrist political ideology and to participate in groupthink?

Gemini 2.5 "reasoning", no real improvement on river crossings. in c/techtakes@awful.systems
Credulous coverage of AI slop on Wikipedia in c/techtakes@awful.systems
[โ€“] flaviat@awful.systems 7 points 3 weeks ago

So perhaps one alternative way to estimate their quality is to check the number of citations, many have more than 100 citations, which is a sign of quality

Andrew Wakefield's 1998 paper has 457 citations on PubMed