I am jack’s completely and utterly unsurprised face
froztbyte
hmm I'm not aware of one beyond general "obstructionism" but that probably is a thing that needs a word
shot:
chaser:
(thread)
transcription of first image
phgn posts: Nice!! The Vercel CEO recently posed for pictures with Netanyahu, so I'm looking for an alternative actually!
aziaziazi replies: I'd be glad if you can share a source of that.
ardren replies: https://finance.yahoo.com/news/vercel-ceo-takes-selfie-israe...
transcription of second image
phgn's comment is flagged and removed
an additional reply by baobun with the links https://www.middleeasteye.net/trending/developers-drop-vercel-call-boycott-after-ceo-posts-selfie-netanyahu, https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45416353, and https://old.reddit.com/r/nextjs/comments/1nueacb/vercel_controversy_ethics_backlash_and_a/
"chain in the sack" is one of my new favourite semi-nonsense phrases
absolutely not the first time I hear something like that, and part of why I don't really like the guy
At the risk of being critical of Zitron
absolutely not a thing to be "at risk of", and a little bit worrying to see someone even worrying about
nah, one of the pillars to make something like it work is by making it zero-cost to implement, to use, and to verify - you advance things by raising the absolute minimum (for everyone) with as little effort cost for others to use
think of e.g. what LetsEncrypt did for https adoption, and signal (and a bit whatsapp when they followed) did for e2e encryption adoption
I’m down with reading books it’s just hard to select them without known reference recommendations
Gonna acquire the works of both, ty :D
black mirror enhancement: because the algorithms involved may present multiple likely fits to any given input, each output is also considered a conception and given due protection (even if not used)
again, I ask you: please make better posts. you could start by not shooting from the hip about things you know little to nothing about. even better would be asking questions to learn.
from here:
nice to see that at least someone dealing with these loons still has their shit grounded in reality
I wonder what is quantified as “emerging risks” under that policy structure - I’d bet it’s not the same stuff the cultists are worried about
either way, more please!