fuck_u_spez_in_particular

joined 2 years ago
[–] fuck_u_spez_in_particular@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Sounds like pain in the ass, I really like the auto-fill feature of Bitwarden... (or in my case vaultwarden as backend)

Arghh, why is every company thinking, that AI will make them valuable...

"Let AI retrieve, generate and manage all your credentials"

Yeah a definite nope, for what reason do I use bitwarden? So that exactly this doesn't happen...

Anyway vaultwarden is what I'm using, much more performant and self-contained, compatible to bitwarden (but you need to host it, obviously)...

Yes it's by far not optimal, and more of a damage control, but people deliberately chose (more) damage. Also if progressive politics were more popular, the dems would be more forced to submit to the voters will...

I didn't fly for years either (nor I do possess a car), so yeah agree, or at least reduce this as much as possible.

But nutrition also has quite an impact, especially when we must consider that highly carbon rich forests still get destructed for (inefficient) food. The high amount of meat consumption in rich countries is unhealthy as well.

[–] fuck_u_spez_in_particular@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Right but you have to begin somewhere, and being a good example for others certainly helps as well.

I try to change my life such that it doesn't impact me much while having fairly large effect. For instance I'm basically vegan (still eat meat occasionally, e.g. when it's otherwise thrown away), I even don't want to eat meat anymore, the taste just got worse for me over time.

It also has effects on the market, e.g. Meat replacement products are quite affordable and popular.

[–] fuck_u_spez_in_particular@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Looks slightly off TBH, sources? Nuts being lowest, while Palm oil being quite high. Nuts are efficient, especially when considering caloric value, but I'm pretty sure something like a potato is better per kg. Palm oil AFAIK is a very efficient (most efficient vegetable) oil, might be that the destruction of highly carbon rich forest is factored in there maybe...

[–] fuck_u_spez_in_particular@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Nah you got to start at the source, more efficient, eat the (future-) parents.

Independently of what your position to vibe-coding or LLMs are: Vibe coding just isn't any programming paradigm. A programming paradigm describes the structure of the program, often on a grammatical (programming language) level (e.g. declarative vs imperative). While "Vibe Coding" can lead to using one or the other paradigm, but is not a paradigm itself, it's a tool to achieve that, similar as using an IDE with code-completion to generate code.

[–] fuck_u_spez_in_particular@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yeah one person can do only limited (at least constructive) change. And that likely takes time, but also consider generational shift. I think it's very likely the dems will slowly (depending on AOCs popularity, faster) shift more progressive. Let's hope the democratic system isn't entirely degraded till then, and Trump get's less popular as well.

[–] fuck_u_spez_in_particular@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (5 children)

So just bury the head in the sand and let the world (or at least US) collapse (i.e. uncontrolled climate change, entire degradation of the social system to capitalism)?

[–] fuck_u_spez_in_particular@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

As audiophile as I am (own very expensive (> 1k) headphones for instance) and additionally I'm musician/producer.

I don't think you can hear the difference between 320kbit bitrate vs flac in a blindtest (this is important, to avoid biasing yourself). I could notice what was a 128kbit mp3 and flac in a blindtest and already that was minimal (and is likely mostly related to the 16k cut-off of 128kbit mp3), but 320kbit, nope...

If you notice a difference it likely has to do with different mastering/LUFS etc. not the compression artifacts themself.

 
view more: next ›