I was talking as compared to other democrats. Hes not as progressive as people think.
That said yeah obviously I'd be to the moon if he was president right now.
Right now because Trump won a second time I'm dead inside. And I think I'll probably be dead inside forever because even if we elect someone better in 2028 I'll know we elected Trump twice. That will haunt me forever.
Jon Stewart is kind of meh. I guess I'd vote for him though.
My understanding is that its because healthcare is still doing very well and that has a lot of women in it as an industry. College educated or otherwise.
A lot of white collar work men tend to get into is being effected by mass adoption of AI and the tariffs are impacting blue collar work.
Only up to a point, fossil fuels getting cheaper will reach a point where it wont be worth extraction outside of for niche customers.
If renewables become plentiful and cheap enough globally fossil fuels will more or less die off in use, even if right now they're going upward in use its temporary. The problem is we're stuck with severe consequences even if they do eventually largely stop. We're stuck with severe consequences if they stop this very instant in fact.
What we really want is renewable energy to become so cheap and plentiful that not only do fossil fuels stop being used but carbon capture technology's high energy cost becomes null and it just becomes a net good. ATM the technology is useless because the high energy cost ends up just putting more co2 into the air anyway than is removed.
Both seem ripe to be someone's fursona.
That's victorian era morals super charged by protestant evangelical puritanism. Kids are perfect innocent angels that become hyper corrupted by the sin of nakedness and the flesh.
The USA never seems to get past this in particular.
Sounds and looks vaguely like a Magic The Gathering card.
What if the 'other' is building a nuke? What if they refuse to vaccinate and are a notch away from creating a new superbug that will likely kill you? What if they're pumping pollution into the air and water and maximizing climate change? What if they're raping and violently torturing children?
What if you need them to maintain your food supply, electricity, medical care, etc? What if you need the local 'other' to back you up if another more distant 'other' decides it going to kill you and take your land?
I say this as a heavily individualist minded person myself: You can't operate a worthwhile society as a collection of islands. You need cooperation.
It would be better to eradicate spacetime itself with a vacuum decay event than to allow a completely brutal "every man for themselves" world to continue existing. Pointless suffering.
Instead you should have said "I welcome a vacuum decay event erasing existence and painlessly and instantly deleting all life on earth."
Bare minimum, if at any point you've expressed as a politician negative views towards democracy or any core philosophical element of democracy or indicates a desire to remove or destroy it, you should be bared from running for office.
Any politician who expresses positive feelings or views of historical parties who dismantled or destroyed democracy should also bar them from running.
You wouldn't even have to use the word "fascism". Just create a law that establishes that its illegal to dismantle, weaken, or destroy democracy and that even conspiring or openly stating the criminal threat of doing so is also a crime and on top of whatever criminal penalties it also prevents you from running for office as punishment.
I might be an atheist's atheist, but if you are anti-empathy you aren't christian, you just like old testament for it's prejudice and horror.