merc

but that's more of a result of poor material conditions forcing inovations

Well, also Germany was one of the world leaders in science and technology in the early 1900s all the way up to WWII. Just look at the list of winners of the Nobel Prizes in Physics and Chemistry and how many of them are German. You could even see this in the recent Oppenheimer movie, where they showed him travelling to the University of Göttingen because that was where you needed to be to study cutting edge theoretical physics. And this was the 1920s when Germany was already suffering having to repay massive war debts after WWI.

What happened? When Hitler rose to power the Nazis drove off all the Jewish scientists, and scared off a lot of the gentiles. It's almost exactly the same situation as in the US today. Even the chaotic Weimar Republic wasn't enough to cause Germany's lead on science to flee. But, when Hitler came to power, the scientists left, and a lot of them came to the US. This was the start of the US dominating science for decades, something which may collapse now due to Trump.

First reich?

Anybody who's interested in Ukraine should follow Tim Mak and his news site Counteroffensive

I'm not sure if he's Canadian or American. He's a graduate of McGill in Canada, but apparently served as a medic in the US Army. He used to work for The Daily Beast and Politico, then for NPR for 5 years. Now he's running his own news organization out of Ukraine. He and his team are reporting on the ground in Ukraine, living through all the drone attacks, then going out to talk to Ukrainians in person. He also covers military issues between China and Taiwan.

Some of the stories he's covered are things like the drone attacks deep inside Russia that destroyed their bombers, but also things you won't get elsewhere like secret apartment concerts in Ukraine.

And if that doesn't convince you, he signs off all his dispatches with his dog of war pics of puppies he and his team run across while reporting on the war.

The city is facing the worse

I think you mean "worst"

We're basically talking about truthiness.

People fact checked a crazy uncle if the things their uncle was saying weren't truthy. But, if a friend's medical advice sounded truthy, they simply accepted it and didn't bother to check.

ChatGPT and other LLMs are designed to sound truthy. If you asked "What's the biggest planet in the solar system" they could respond "I think that the biggest planet is Jupiter. My information is that Jupiter has a mass of X and a volume of Y. The next biggest planet should be Saturn, which has a mass of Z and a volume of Q. But, you should verify this by consulting these sources..."

Instead, these LLMs are designed so that the answers they provide are incredibly confident. When a user replies that they're wrong, they change their answer and generate a new one that is just as confident. That's the kind of answer that is going to seem truthy.

It seems to me that saying that someone does not neatly fit into the category of man or woman is accepting that "category of man" and "category of woman" are valid categories. Rather than fighting sexism, it's reinforcing sexism. If someone truly believed that cultural norms about what's male and what's female was sexist BS, there would be no need for a "they" pronoun.

some cultures assign adherence to certain behavioural norms to that

Isn't that sexism, something we should be fighting by saying "women can do that too?"

but they would move more to the suburbs and rural areas, and out of the cities. That still doesn't sound so bad.

It sounds bad for the city cores though. I like cities and I especially like cities with dense cores that combine good walkable areas with great transit. Tokyo is a prime example. Some people still drive in Tokyo, but a lot of people use the amazing mass transit system there. The end result for Tokyo is that mass transit hubs become these amazing walkable areas with all kinds of interesting things to see.

If everybody except the most poor get self driving cars and move to the suburbs, the downtown cores might become robocar hells, where cars have the priority and pedestrians need to wait 5 minutes to cross a street.

Any way, I don't think self-driving cars should replace public transport, but complement it.

Yeah, I agree. There might need to be some kind of government intervention to make sure that people have an incentive to use public transit instead of just going everywhere in self-driving cars. But, if you can make journeys robocar -> mass transit -> robocar that's still an improvement on just full robocar journeys.

As for bikes, I have spent most of my life using a bike to get around. I want Netherlands style bike highways everywhere. But, it's really hard to get any progress with bike-friendly designs in the current climate. What I think some people should do is have some very well developed bike highway plans in their back pockets, waiting for the opportunity to roll them out.

It could be that self-driving cars will take over the roads in a way that was like how cars replaced horses. If that happens, there are going to be a lot of cities that are going to have to make new laws suddenly: what happens to street parking, what do we do with existing parking lots, etc. That would be the time to pull out a big plan and say "ok, first of all, let's install all these bike highways with the room we now have".

does not neatly fit into the category of man or woman

What defines the category of man?

The quote in his online biography about his modeling career is a bit more detailed:

Dolph took up modeling at the famous Zoli Agency to make some extra cash. 'A bit too tall and muscular for a model's size 40',

Wow. Can you imagine a bigger ego boost than being turned down to be a male model because you're just too tall and muscular?

Being perpetually exhausted because your celebrity girlfriend keeps bringing back too many girls for the group sex session is a close second though.

Ha! It makes it sound like you're saying that young black kids are self-important dickheads and that's why he's a good role model.

But, yeah, I know what you're trying to say. Despite his social media presence, the image that kids generally see is a very positive one. He's a somewhat stylish (in his own way) guy, who clearly has personality, and is a very accomplished scientist. I just cringe any time he comments on something not related to astrophysics.