null

joined 2 weeks ago
[–] null@piefed.nullspace.lol -4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (29 children)

Again: I asked for you to quote them saying they were defederating because hexbear users have stances common to communists.

What you gave me was your interpretation of why they bolded some text.

[–] null@piefed.nullspace.lol -3 points 1 week ago (31 children)

The Lemmy.world admins manufactured the idea of Hexbear users intentionally brigading lemmy.world threads before they even federated, choosing to pre-emptively defederate, and directly cited ideological differences as the reason.

Quote it. Your evidence so far is "they're lying".

[–] null@piefed.nullspace.lol -3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (33 children)

For the first, it’s saying exactly what I said, that it’s encouraging users that do choose to engage to do so with professionalism.

Propaganda wars and professionalism are not mutually exclusive. Nice try.

For the latter, it isn’t a statement of intent, but a description of what is actually going on, a struggle between liberalism and leftism. There are prominent brigaders and drama farmers on .world, sh.itjust.works, piefed.world, etc that engage in ideological propagandizing against leftists, just like there are leftists that do so against right-wingers. This isn’t a command to Hexbear users to go out and disseminate spooky scary leftist ideology, but a description of what already exists.

You don't get dizzy from so much spinning?

I mean, by that logic, Lemmy World admins never specifically stated that they were defederating because of people holding viewpoints they don't like. You want to have it both ways so bad it's disgusting.

Maybe these tactics actually work in Communist spaces? That would explain a lot...

[–] null@piefed.nullspace.lol -3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (35 children)

“Please try to keep the dirtbag lib-dunking to hexbear itself. Do not follow the Chapo Rules of Posting, instead try to engage utilizing informed rhetoric with sources to dismantle western propaganda. Posting the western atrocity propaganda and pig poop balls is hilarious but will pretty quickly get you banned and if enough of us do it defederated.”

“I can assure you there will be no lemmygrad brigades, that energy would be better funneled into the current war against liberalism on the wider fediverse.”

I mean, it's obvious why you're lying. I just didn't expect you to lean right into the whole "there is no war in Ba Sing Se" vibe.

[–] null@piefed.nullspace.lol -5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (37 children)

Not sure why you would post the source and then lie about what it says:

  • “Please try to keep the dirtbag lib-dunking to hexbear itself. Do not follow the Chapo Rules of Posting, instead try to engage utilizing informed rhetoric with sources to dismantle western propaganda. Posting the western atrocity propaganda and pig poop balls is hilarious but will pretty quickly get you banned and if enough of us do it defederated.”
  • “The West’s role in the world, through organizations such as NATO, the IMF, and the World Bank - among many others - are deeply harmful to the billions of people living both inside and outside of their imperial core.”
  • “These organizations constitute the modern imperial order, with the United States at its heart - we are not fooled by the term “rules-based international order.” It is in the Left’s interest for these organizations to be demolished. When and how this will occur, and what precisely comes after, is the cause of great debate and discussion on this site, but it is necessary for a better world.”

“I can assure you there will be no lemmygrad brigades, that energy would be better funneled into the current war against liberalism on the wider fediverse.”

“All loyal, honest, active and upright Communists must unite to oppose the liberal tendencies shown by certain people among us, and set them on the right path. This is one of the tasks on our ideological front.”

At least you're open about being a hypocrite though, when it comes to banning people for just "having stances"

[–] null@piefed.nullspace.lol -5 points 1 week ago (39 children)

If you're really gonna say deliberately connecting to an instance with the stated goal of dismantling and inserting a communist ideology via a propaganda war is tantamount to "just having a stance" then it should be clear to everyone what a bad actor you are.

Imagine if I publicaly stated that the goal of my instance was to build a userbase, infiltrate .ml, dismantle communist ideology, and spread liberal propaganda. Are you really gonna pretend you'd leap to my defense when Dessalines obviously banned/defederated me?

Hell, he loves to abuse rule 2 to silence "Liberals" constantly. Yet you don't seem to have anything to say about that...

[–] null@piefed.nullspace.lol 5 points 1 week ago

Probably should have said "looking at your phone" instead of "have your headphones on".

[–] null@piefed.nullspace.lol 3 points 1 week ago

Never had the opportunity, but I love me some nice, warm, tape saturation

view more: ‹ prev next ›