nulluser

Probably Rule #4

4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Except, no.

SAVANNAH, Ga. (WTOC) - Hyundai Motor Company has unveiled their roadmap to 2030 plan which includes an expansion for the Hyundai Motor Group Metaplant America in Ellabell.

This announcement comes just two weeks after Homeland Security raided the Hyundai megasite in what the agency called the largest single-site enforcement operation in its history.

According to a release by Hyundai Motor Company, phase 2 of the expansion is set to add production capacity of 200,000 units by 2028 - bringing total production capacity to 500,000 cars a year. The expansion will include a $2.7 billion investment and will create 3,000 new jobs.

https://www.wtoc.com/2025/09/18/hyundai-invest-27-billion-georgia-plant-expansion-after-immigration-raid/

It was a rhetorical question.

Anyone else reminded of Victor Borge?

https://youtu.be/TIf3IfHCoiE

The second and third ones on the list are MSN & Newsweek. So, if by "local" you mean "US based", or by "all" you mean "sone."

ETA https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/body-black-student-found-hanging-tree-mississippi-rcna231661

https://cancelthehate.com/express-concern

You absolutely do not understand No True Scotsman, then.

This whole thing started with you arguing against someone that stated that there is no central authoritative body that decides who is and isn't christian. You have yet to present one. Instead, you just present YOUR criteria, as if you're the authoritative body, but your not, because there isn't one.

I could call myself a Christian and make up whatever criteria I want that makes me qualified, and there's nobody to stop me.

If you can find an actual example of a Christian denomination that...

And even if I did, you would reject it because they don't meet your definition of a Christian denomination, so I still failed to "find an actual example of a Christian denomination that..."

there is one standard that all Christians agree to

Except those that don't. You're committing the fallacy right there. If those people over there that call themselves Christians don't agree with your arbitrary criteria, then they're not true Christians. Except your only evidence to back up your claim is, "trust me bro." There's no license or certificate from any kind of authority. It's just you making shit up.

Allow me to demonstrate.

All Christians have a tattoo on their forehead of Jesus on the cross with a pool of blood at the base of the cross. Every year they go through a secretive cleansing and atonement ritual that culminates in an update to the tattoo that makes the pool of blood bigger. You can identify the most pious Christians by how big their pool of blood is.

If you don't have this tattoo, then you're not a Christian and your erroneous opinion of what criteria makes someone christian is irrelevant.

To summarize, the person you responded to stated

There is no authority, no person or group of people, authorized to decide who is a Christian and who is not.

To which you responded,

Yes there absolutely are.

Followed by a wall of text that presented absolutely zero authority figures authorized to decide who is, and isn't, christian.

All you gave is YOUR criteria, but there's no reason anybody needs to follow your criteria. You're also not authorized to decide. That's the point.

No True Scotsman

No True Scotsman comes to mind.

#bandnames

The infant contracted it before they could get vaccinated.

How do you think the infant got it, from the measles fairy?

That virus was a gift from someone they came in contact with, so probably a family member.

And that family member was given it by someone else, who got it from someone else, who got it from someone else, and so on, and so on.

A whole long line of people that each bear responsibility for killing that child by not taking personal responsibility and getting vaccinated. Any one of them could have halted the transmission of the virus on that trajectory that lead to killing that child at that time. It only took one of them, but none of them did the responsible thing.

Most of those people didn't know that child, never met them, and are still blissfully unaware that their lazy selfishness killed a child. But that doesn't absolve them of responsibility. They killed a child.