this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2025
375 points (98.7% liked)

News

30499 readers
3041 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Hedge-fund billionaire Bill Ackman plans to bankroll a New York City mayoral campaign, arguing that his affluent associates are poised to flood the election with money in an effort to defeat Democratic Socialist frontrunner Zohran Mamdani.

Ackman said he was “gravely concerned” because he believed the left-wing candidate’s policies would be disastrous, triggering an exodus of the wealthy that would endanger New York’s public services by hollowing out its tax base.

Arguing that his own support of President Trump would automatically disqualify anyone Ackman might put forward, the activist investor said he was making a public appeal: Anyone capable of taking down Mamdani in the Nov. 4 election should step forward and volunteer.

“Importantly, there are hundreds of millions of dollars of capital available to back a competitor to Mamdani that can be put together overnight (believe me, I am in the text strings and the WhatsApp groups) so that a great alternative candidate won’t spend any time,” he wrote.

“So if the right candidate would raise his or her hand tomorrow, the funds will pour in.”

It’s unclear whether New Yorkers would honor such a candidate. The recent intervention by Elon Musk in Wisconsin’s state supreme court election indicated the voting public does not always respond well to billionaires using their money to sway races.

New York mayoral races are notoriously unpredictable due to the city’s chronically low turnout. In 2017, for example, Bill de Blasio won reelection with only 14% of registered voters coming out to support him.

A large influx of New Yorkers heading to the voting booth because they are as concerned as Ackman could easily affect the outcome. If Cuomo can hold on to enough fundraisers, political pundits also point out, it’s possible he could run as an independent like Adams, splitting the left vote and spoiling the race.

Ackman, however, argued all these factors would support the emergence of a centrist candidate looking to position themself on the national stage. It could even be another businessman like Bloomberg, he suggested, although Ackman in an earlier post appeared to indicate he would not seek to run himself.

“For the aspiring politician there is no better way to get name recognition, build relationships with long-term donors, and to showcase oneself,” the hedge fund manager wrote, pitching the campaign like a business deal. “The risk/reward of running for mayor over the next 132 days is extremely compelling as the cost in time and energy is small and the upside is enormous.”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

Bill Ackman is evil and actively harming the NY and US economy. He wants people to become poorer year after year, until they can't spend on consumption anymore, and that will cripple the economy.

[–] ThePiedPooper@discuss.online 4 points 3 hours ago

Anyone who the billionaire hedge fund manager is planning to bankroll is the guy you probably should be voting against.

[–] Pacattack57@lemmy.world 13 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

So let me get this straight. Current tax law favors billionaires. He’s concerned that progressive policies will target taxing billionaires forcing a mass exodus of billionaires thereby undercutting the tax base. In other words they’re already not paying taxes but taxing them more will make them leave. Make it make sense.

[–] KumaSudosa 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

It's sad because it does have to be a global movement. If my country decides to heavily increase taxes on the wealthy - as should be done - this is exactly what happens because they can just easily move to Switzerland or Monaco, or some other tax haven, and laugh us right in the face. It's the genius of capitalism

[–] iknowitwheniseeit@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Evidence shows that while rich people threaten to leave for tax or financial reasons, they rarely do.

[–] KumaSudosa 1 points 2 hours ago

Because generally speaking they aren't that hit. Sweden, for example, removed its wealth and inheritance tax reeal fast once it was introduced in the 90s.

Norway introduced such measures with their current government and suddenly you have a ton of wealthy Norwegians finding their way to Switzerland. So yes, you do see it happening, and the more you'll increase it the more likely they are to move and take their resources with them. I'm not arguing that we shouldn't gax the rich, of course, but that it needs to be globally coordinated (which it will never be)

[–] ViatorOmnium@piefed.social 13 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

As a potential independent candidate Cuomo didn't poll that bad if you don't consider that:

  • the 39% he got are the same as Mamdani, so it would be 50/50 at best
  • as a known quantity, this 39% are probably his ceiling
  • it still didn't factor Schumer effectively endorsing Mamdani on social media

Political players are in still in flux, but, for the right wing of the Democratic Party, moving against Mamdani is getting riskier and riskier by the day. Not only would they lose the "unity" argument to mobilize the left close to the midterms, but the risk of suffering an humiliating defeat is too great.

[–] kemsat@lemmy.world 29 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

So they are ok with spending hundreds of millions of dollars, just not in any way that actually improves the city for the people that live in it?

It’s not about the money, it’s just misanthropy.

[–] NeilBru@lemmy.world 5 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

"It's not to make sure that I have a lot; it's to make sure that I have a lot more than everyone else. Forever."

[–] e461h@sh.itjust.works 11 points 6 hours ago

Exactly. The ‘public services’ he wants to save is bribery to avoid paying his fair share. This guy is offering a ‘powerful people’ club membership so he can avoid giving back to a society that enabled his mindblowing fortune. Our system has gotten so used to it he’s totally good with saying it all out loud as if he’s some sort of victim.

Society’s cancer.

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 3 points 5 hours ago

you're doing something right when luigi, zohran got billionaires panties in a wad.

[–] SlartyBartFast@sh.itjust.works 23 points 11 hours ago

Guy kinda sounds like a douchebag

[–] AHamSandwich@lemmy.world 55 points 13 hours ago
[–] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 37 points 13 hours ago

It's wild that they billionaires are openly just saying "whoops, we can't be letting the people elect someone good for them, here let's fix that".

[–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 40 points 13 hours ago

Somebody more left-wing than Mamdani has the chance to do something hilarious

[–] pawnfuture@lemmy.world 4 points 8 hours ago

The racist republicans currently have the president of hells angels a biker gang responsible for coordinated killings, meth trafficking and sales. The gerontocracy of DNC is frightened and the GOP know this shift is their fault. Let it rain.

[–] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 12 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Who owns the voting machines? Is the software audited? Are there tabulation servers?

[–] AniZaeger@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

Electronic voting machines are a free-for-all. TBH, I would feel a helluva lot more comfortable with them if they were regulated at the very least as strictly as the 100K+ Electronic Gaming Machines across the state of Nevada.

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 13 points 11 hours ago

New York mayoral races are notoriously unpredictable due to the city’s chronically low turnout. In 2017, for example, Bill de Blasio won reelection with only 14% of registered voters coming out to support him.

Damn, my hopes for Mamdani just got even higher. Low turnout under ordinary circumstances give high-enthusiasm candidates an advantage, by that enthusiastic base's relative size to the ordinarily voting electorate.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 20 points 13 hours ago

Hollowing out the tax-base? Of what? Billionaires who have turned tax evasion into a sports championship?

In most places in the world, tax is primarily paid by the working people, not by the rich.

Which obviously leaves them with to much money that they squander on anti-citizen political campaigns like this. When they have the money for bribery on that level, they have the money to pax taxes like everyone else.

[–] MeekerThanBeaker@lemmy.world 235 points 18 hours ago (3 children)

Billionaires are against Mamdani, eh? Something tells me he is the right guy for the job then.

[–] fluxion@lemmy.world 49 points 17 hours ago

Surely this billionaire Trump supporter cares about the interests of democratic voters

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works 37 points 14 hours ago (3 children)

You leaving NYC Ackman? Gonna take Wall St. with you?

Fuck off to Ireland, see if I care.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 141 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (3 children)

So kind of this guy to give Mamdani an incredible basis for an ad campaign.

Like, for real, does this rich fuck not understanding that the vast majority of the American populace wants to see more blue shells? Honestly, how could it be more clear? All Zohran has to do is something like:

There’s an old proverb that says you should judge a person by the enemies they’ve made. Well, I’ve made an enemy of the billionaire Bill Ackman, and he’s pledged a blank check to whoever runs against me. But, there’s good news: votes decide elections, not money. I’m not listening to the money. I’m listening to the voters. I’m listening to you. Let’s win this together.

[–] DancingBear@midwest.social 1 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

God damn he’s a genius because he doesn’t actually have to spend any money…..

(There isn’t anyone capable)

[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 164 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Billionaires are scared. That's a good sign ..

[–] ObtuseDoorFrame@lemm.ee 32 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

What's super ironic to me is that taxing them actually makes them safer because if they pay their fair share people wouldn't want to murder them as much as they do now.

[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 9 points 12 hours ago

And if they paid as much of a percentage as you or me they'd still have more wealth than they could spend in a hundred lifetimes. When a hoarder can't self-regulate, others have to step in.

That's why taxing the ultra-rich and closing all the loopholes needs to be seen as the compassionate option: it's literally better for everyone. All of society is harmed when the wealth gap further widens...

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 13 points 14 hours ago

They think they can buy enough guards to keep this from happening to them.

[–] match@pawb.social 28 points 14 hours ago

Gimme a hundred million dollars to lose to Mamdani. Sounds like a cushy gig.

[–] HotsauceHurricane@lemmy.world 17 points 13 hours ago

Sounds like he is a frightened douche-canoe. Fuck that guy.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmings.world 14 points 13 hours ago

Okay, but Cuomo spent triple what Zohran spent, and got his ass kicked.

Tell you what, just distribute all that money to your employees, and the result of the election will be the same as if you blew it all on a loser.

[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 68 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

A billionaire just causally announcing that he can influence, finance and promote an election using his money in order to get what only interests themselves ... rather than in allowing democratic processes elect someone the people actually want and need.

[–] Quadhammer@lemmy.world 6 points 7 hours ago

All that money spent against them when they could idk just stop being little shits and pay their fair share. With interest of course

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 88 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Ackman said he was “gravely concerned” because he believed the left-wing candidate’s policies would be disastrous, triggering an exodus of the wealthy that would endanger New York’s public services by hollowing out its tax base.

wtf? Is this really the route they're going to take? I know, pay your fucking share of taxes and then there wouldn't be a "hollowing out."

[–] CorruptCheesecake@lemmy.world 46 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

If it's a choice between hollowing out the billionaire population or the middle class, I choose the billionaires.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 17 points 14 hours ago

by hollowing out its tax base

As if the wealthy pay taxes. GTFO with that BS.

[–] besselj@lemmy.ca 99 points 18 hours ago

Billionaires should not exist.

[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 69 points 18 hours ago

This is the biggest endorsement Mamdani could get. I hope New Yorkers are paying attention.

[–] thefartographer@lemm.ee 61 points 18 hours ago

Billionaires hate him, genocide enablers hate him, fascists hate him, Nazis hate him, government criminals hate him, citizen concerned for fellow citizens love him.

This Texan Jew is about to send some donations to a Yankee antisemite.
*references to antisemitism are sarcasm based on comments from people who apparently loooove fascism*

[–] Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world 6 points 11 hours ago

These losers a terrified of people figuring out how badly they are being screwed by the Goofy Old Phuckers.

[–] phoenixarise@lemmy.world 51 points 18 hours ago

People of NYC: your vote is far more powerful than this dude throwing his lunch money at the opposition.

load more comments
view more: next ›