swlabr

joined 2 years ago
[–] swlabr@awful.systems 2 points 2 weeks ago

(This comment is not really a criticism)

you would not be the first person to look at the etymology of a slur, note that it originally had a different context, and point out that it doesn’t really map 1:1 with its usage.

having not watched the clone wars I can’t comment on specifics with your example.

Anyway, regarding slurs against non-sentient things: “Lemon”, “hunkajunk”, “shitbox” get used for cars, i demand justice for cars!!!

[–] swlabr@awful.systems 0 points 2 weeks ago (8 children)

Yeah nah, that’s not what he says at all. In that video, he says: “there is no accepted definition of a fourth person pronoun, here are some concepts that are sometimes referred to as the fourth person, does the modern usage of “chat” fit any of these?” and the answer is: “in some specific ways yes, in other ways no.”

I don’t think he’s the one that started the idea of chat being a fourth person pronoun, I think he’s just discussing the statement and using it as an opportunity to communicate some linguistic concepts, which is cool and good. Also, what’s in your craw, different person?

[–] swlabr@awful.systems 7 points 2 weeks ago

In my understanding: they aren’t making jokes with the expectation that their audience laughs at the joke itself. The audience is laughing at the target of the joke. In this sense, you might say the right doesn’t meme, and further speculate that they can’t meme.

So yeah they post and repost a lot of “memes,” but it’s never really to be like: “look at this clever meme I made,” it’s just “look at this meme that makes fun of x people”. Their accusation of humorlessness is just a confession.

[–] swlabr@awful.systems 1 points 2 weeks ago (11 children)

Based solely on the source this man doesn’t seem to deserve any ire. In fact he breaks down the statement “chat is a 4th person pronoun” quite well. What’s stuck in your craw, old fruit?

[–] swlabr@awful.systems 4 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah. Even though I was pretty sure there wasn’t anything of true substance, I was hoping there would be more to this story.

[–] swlabr@awful.systems 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I’m sure Suno would find some way to spin it.

[–] swlabr@awful.systems 7 points 2 weeks ago

I fuckin knew it. I did not know where to look to see the contributor attribution, so thanks for pointing it out.

[–] swlabr@awful.systems 17 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

It’s also why the right can’t meme

[–] swlabr@awful.systems 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

are all of my political opinions based on resource management in RTS games??? it would explain all the pylons I’ve warped in around my house

Let’s aim higher. No AI dcs until we are warp capable

[–] swlabr@awful.systems 8 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] swlabr@awful.systems 6 points 2 weeks ago

By modern values he is referring to 64-bit numbers

[–] swlabr@awful.systems 9 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Ah, the beauty of the fundamental theorem of concern-troll linguistics. If you can change the words in a sentence so that the new sentence is racist, the original must be as well. Example:

Aaron: The weather is just ok.

Baron: OMG. I can’t believe you just said that. What if I changed the noun and adjective, like this: “ is ”. Go home and think about what you did.

 

Discussion on AI starts at about 17mins. The Bas(ilisk) drop happens at 20:30. Sorry if ads mess up my time stamps. I think this is the second time it’s come up on the show.

view more: ‹ prev next ›