Feddit.dk

792 readers
82 users here now

Her kan du snakke med andre danskere om alt mellem himmel og jord (husk dog at læse reglerne nedenfor).

Feddit.dk er en instans af Lemmy, som er en fri forumplatform, som ikke kan styres af enkelte firmaer. Derved fungerer Feddit.dk som et frit alternativ til andre lignende sociale platforme (fx Reddit), dog uden reklamer eller topstyring fra et amerikansk selskab.

Feddit.dk er en del af Fediverset, et forbund af uafhængige sociale platforme forbundet via internettet. Ved at registrere dig hos Feddit.dk kan du dermed også tilgå andre sider i forbundet. Du kan se en oversigt over andre Lemmy-sider her.


Regler

  1. Husk mennesket på den anden side af skærmen. Vær rar ved andre og vis respekt.
  2. Indlæg skal primært være på dansk. Svensk, norsk, grønlandsk, færøsk og engelsk er tilladt i et begrænset omfang.
  3. Indlæg skal være inden for den danske lovgivnings rammer. Det du skriver, bør du ligeledes kunne sige til en person, du møder på gaden.
  4. Reklamer eller andre former for selvpromovering og spam er ikke tilladt.

Mere information

Klik her for at læse mere om Feddit.dk

founded 2 years ago
ADMINS

Et dansk forum for alle interesser og emner.

26
27
 
 
28
 
 
29
 
 
30
31
32
 
 

I am not joking when I say that I thinked for hours about how do people find each other in 2025.

Currently, the world is in very weird state. People online are either using social video platforms or they are reading news or lurking in online forums in it's different shapes and forms.

Most chat platforms that I know had shut down and most alt social platforms are almost dead. Even Hackernews had started to see a lower amount of comments compared to previous years.

I want a serious answer, how should I find people online to talk to about anything really other than politics?

33
 
 
  • Rumeysa Ozturk ordered released immediately from Louisiana detention center
  • Ozturk was detained after pro-Palestinian campus advocacy
    
  • Judge said her detention chills free speech of non-citizens

May 9 (Reuters) - A federal judge ordered the Trump administration on Friday to immediately release a Tufts University student from Turkey who has been held for over six weeks in a Louisiana immigration detention facility after she co-wrote an opinion piece criticizing her school's response to Israel's war in Gaza.

U.S. District Judge William Sessions during a hearing in Burlington, Vermont, granted bail to Rumeysa Ozturk, who is at the center of one of the highest-profile cases to emerge from Republican President Donald Trump's campaign to deport pro-Palestinian activists on American campuses.

The judge said Ozturk had raised a substantial claim that the sole reason she was being detained was "simply and purely the expression that she made or shared in the op-ed in violation of her First Amendment rights."

"Her continued detention potentially chills the speech of the millions and millions of individuals in this country who are not citizens," Sessions said. "Any one of them may now avoid exercising their First Amendment rights for fear of being whisked away to a detention center."

Following the hearing, Ozturk, who appeared before the judge virtually from the Louisiana detention facility, could be seen hugging one of her attorneys. Tufts has said it plans to help provide Ozturk housing upon her release.

The judge ruled shortly after a federal appeals court rejected, the Trump administration's bid to re-detain Columbia University student Mohsen Mahdawi, a Palestinian campus activist who a different judge in Vermont ordered released last week after immigration authorities arrested him as well.

Ozturk's arrest on March 25 by masked, plainclothes law enforcement officers on a street in the Boston suburb of Somerville, Massachusetts, near her home was captured in a viral video and occurred after the U.S. Department of State revoked her student visa.

The sole basis authorities have provided for revoking her visa was an opinion piece she co-authored in Tufts' student newspaper criticizing the school's response to calls by students to divest from companies with ties to Israel and to "acknowledge the Palestinian genocide."

34
 
 
35
 
 
36
 
 

I'm a software engineer, The conditions of my job are actually pretty sweet: I get to work remote from a medium CoL city, I get paid well, my schedule is flexible so I don't have to be chained to my desk all day. The stuff I code is pretty boring but it's not the worst thing in the world.

The thing I can't stand is my coworkers: so many people I've met in this industry are money-obsessed ladder-climbing yuppies. Some of my coworkers are honest to god land lords. I dread having conversations with anyone in project management. These people are territorial and become upset whenever they're not included in some meeting. If one product manager gets added to a call, I hear about it from the other PMs. A good day for me is when I have 8 straight hours of coding to do and I don't speak to a single soul at work.

I am not anti-social. I have worked at other companies where my coworkers were really cool and I enjoyed talking with them. I like to take my laptop and work at the dog park and talk to other people Maybe it's a regional thing? My coworkers are mostly in New York and my other jobs have all been in the South.

37
 
 

No thoughts detected:

38
 
 
39
19
azaza.aaaza (www.azaw.com)
submitted 1 hour ago* (last edited 48 minutes ago) by dwazou@lemm.ee to c/youshouldknow@lemmy.world
 
 

The former prime minister said the News Corporation chief executive made it clear at a dinner in February 1997 that his newspapers would not come out for him at the forthcoming general election without this change.

Sir John said he was advised before the election that he “ought to try to make some effort to get closer to the Murdoch press and I agreed that I would write Mr Murdoch to dinner”.

He added: “In the dinner it became apparent in discussion that Mr Murdoch said that he really didn’t like our European policies… and he wished me to change our European policies".

“If we couldn’t change our European policies, his papers could not and would not support the Conservative government. There was no question of me changing our policies.”

He said: “My feeling was that what he was edging towards was a referendum on leaving the European Union. I made it pretty clear we were not going to change our European policies.

“It is not very often someone sits in front of a prime minister and says, ‘I would like you to change your policy and if you do not change your policy our organisation cannot support you’.”

https://www.channel4.com/news/major-denies-sun-editor-abused-him-after-black-wednesday

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/former-uk-prime-minister-john-major-says-rupert-murdoch-tried-to-change-government-policy/

https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2012/06/12/154851445/former-british-pm-john-major-says-murdoch-tried-to-influence-policy

40
 
 
41
42
 
 
43
 
 
44
45
 
 
46
47
 
 
48
49
 
 
50
 
 
  • Trump officials mull proposing COFA status to Greenland
  • COFA agreement would see U.S. defending Greenland, but keep island independent
  • Plan faces several practical hurdles

WASHINGTON, May 9 (Reuters) - U.S. officials are discussing a plan to pull Greenland into America's sphere of influence using a type of agreement that the United States has used to keep close ties with several Pacific Island nations, according to two U.S. officials and another person familiar with the discussions.

Under the plan being considered, the Trump administration would propose to Greenland's leaders that the island enter into a so-called Compact of Free Association, or COFA, with the United States.

While the precise details of COFA agreements - which have only ever been extended to the small island nations of Micronesia, the Marshall Islands and Palau - vary depending on the signatory, the U.S. government typically provides many essential services, from mail delivery to emergency management to military protection. In exchange, the U.S. military operates freely in COFA countries and trade with the U.S. is largely duty-free.

President Donald Trump, who during his first administration floated the idea of acquiring Greenland, has pressed even harder since taking office in January, refusing to rule out taking the island by force. Denmark, which governs the island, has sharply rebuffed the idea.

A COFA agreement would stop short of Trump's ambition to make the island of 57,000 people a part of the U.S. It is not the only Greenland plan on the table, the sources said, and it would face many practical hurdles.

Reuters reported before Trump took office that some advisers had informally suggested the idea. But it has not been previously revealed that White House officials have begun talks about the logistics behind such a proposal.

Some officials at the National Security Council and the National Energy Dominance Council, which Trump established, are involved in the talks, two of the sources said. The National Economic Council is also involved, one of those sources added.

COFA agreements have previously been inked with independent countries, and Greenland would likely need to separate from Denmark for such a plan to proceed. While polls show Greenlanders are interested in independence, surveys also show most do not want to be part of the U.S. A COFA - which cedes significant autonomy to Washington - could be viewed with similar skepticism.

view more: ‹ prev next ›