this post was submitted on 01 Mar 2025
356 points (96.4% liked)

Technology

63614 readers
3163 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmit.online/post/5292633

This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/science by /u/calliope_kekule on 2025-03-01 05:53:17+00:00.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 38 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

It's infuriating when a light turns red while only a few of the cars have gone though, makes sense a more intelligent algorithm would be more efficient.

I think it's often the opposite, a traffic circle is much less intelligent but quite effective at increasing traffic flow. We can't put them everywhere, but we should put them in more places.

[–] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 26 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I pass like 15 lights on my commute and the amount of time standing still for NO REASON is absolutely infuriating. How much could it possibly cost to add a simple sensor? No cars coming from the sides? Light stays green! But no, it's all just dumb timers instead...

[–] cynar@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Interestingly, some lights are set up to deliberately slow down speeders. If you are above the speed limit, they turn red, just to slow things back down. Unfortunately, most of the people involved never put cause and effect together.

What annoys me is the road to work in the morning actually seems to do the opposite. It’s a 35 or 40mph road, but if you do 40 you’re not gonna make it through without stopping. But if you do 50-60? No stops.

Once again though people don’t pick up on this.

[–] 9bananas@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

how would that even work, if there's no indication that driving too fast was the reason for the red light?

do these actually include some sort of screen that tells the driver they were too fast and that's why the light turned red?

I'd imagine that this "feature" would only result in more frustration, and thus more speeding, instead of less.