this post was submitted on 05 Mar 2025
656 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

64075 readers
5926 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MTK@lemmy.world 65 points 9 hours ago (4 children)

Basically declaring that they don't allow free speech.

"Hey, you have been liking things we disagree with and we need an echo chamber here, align with us or fuck off. Sincerely, the money hungry bitches of the internet! Also heil daddy musk!"

[–] Geodad@lemm.ee 30 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

Of course they don’t. They banned me 3 years ago for saying that if you have the chance, you should always punch a Nazi.

[–] MTK@lemmy.world 8 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Excuse me? If someone says they want a genocide you have to wait until they take over, only then are you allowed to support violence.

I'm against violence, I think that reasonable and even somewhat unreasonable people should be talked with. But if someone says "fuck you I will kill you" you should have the right to punch them, it is the same as self defence, because next time they will kill you.

[–] Geodad@lemm.ee 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I know. The two reactions when I tell people about that are usually either rage or amusement. I’m here now, so fuck Reddit.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

What was the actual reason they gave when they blocked your account. Because I had one of my accounts banned, but not for any logical reason, and they just gave me a made-up reason of I was being aggressive (I wasn't being aggressive I was just pointing out to someone that he was gatekeeping, which he was).

For contacts the guy was trying to suggest that the only people who should be allowed to be employed in the software development industry are people with a relevant university level qualification, which was obviously stupid because it would block pretty much all of the current tech billionaires from their own companies.

[–] thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

going to college to learn technology in the 1990s would have been useless for acquiring the skills that I have developed and honed in my 25+ years in tech

[–] surph_ninja@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago

They permabanned two of my accounts during the election last year, just because I said I didn’t care when Trump said Liz Cheney should be shot. She’s a warmonger who’s called for violence against millions of innocent people. Not gonna clutch my pearls when anyone (even Trump) threatens her.

[–] futatorius@lemm.ee 8 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

Basically declaring that they don’t allow free speech.

It's a privately owned platform. You never have an assurance of free speech on any of those, and on Reddit, the rot set in years ago.

[–] Wilco@lemm.ee -2 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

I have a strange opinion, but here goes: The Right to Free Speech (Im in the US here), should protect you from censorship. Doing what Reddit is doing should be considered a Rights violation and we should be able to sue them into the ground.

[–] shaggyb@lemmy.world 1 points 17 seconds ago

Well, you are certainly entitled to that opinion even though it's wrong, and I do think banning you for it is also wrong.

There's a big difference between having ideas and taking actions. Ideas cannot be allowed to become illegal. Even disgusting ones.

The correct response to unconscionable ideas is social, not institutional.

[–] samus12345@lemm.ee 3 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Terrible idea. Any site that bans for hate speech would also be a rights violation. If a platform doesn't share your values, leave it.

[–] Wilco@lemm.ee 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Yes, sadly, freedom of speech includes freedom of hate speech. The platform would have to rely on its users downvoting or ridiculing the offender rather than outright bans.

[–] samus12345@lemm.ee 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

See Twitter to see what "free speech absolutism" gets you. The hateful stuff will quickly overrun and take over the platform, chasing decent people away.

[–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 1 points 46 minutes ago (1 children)

Twitter isn't even remotely pro-free-speech; much like Reddit, they claim to be in order to defend the worst people on the platform, while routinely deleting or banning people for speech they disagree with

[–] samus12345@lemm.ee 2 points 35 minutes ago

That's correct. But it starts by allowing hate speech. Can you give an example of a single platform that allows it that didn't become a toxic shithole?

[–] MTK@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

There is a big jump from "we are a private company and we have internal rules" to "we are a private company and our internal rules that directly go against human rights"

[–] WindyRebel@lemmy.world 5 points 8 hours ago

Based on what I read in the posted article, everyone is making a big leap here. Of course I expect you all to be right in the end based on Reddit being a shitshow, but we don’t know what the content they are referring to is exactly.

For all we know, they are only referring to stuff like human trafficking or child porn. The statement is vague.

[–] Guns0rWeD13@lemmy.world 0 points 6 hours ago

hypothetically speaking, if someone blew up their office HQ, that would send a powerful message. of course, if you have the balls to do that, there are some other offices that would probably be much better targets.