this post was submitted on 11 May 2025
195 points (95.8% liked)

Games

38498 readers
1348 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here and here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] simple@lemm.ee 18 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The game is self-published. They used to be published by Private Division but went indie when that company got sold. The game had legitimately troubled development.

[–] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social 8 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Still doesn't legitimize demands for positive reviews. Take honest feedback, or don't.

[–] Katana314@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I wouldn't see it SO negatively. If they were paying people for reviews, then yes, that's corruption; but every YouTuber uses phrases like "Drop a like" and it's considered normal. When you worked hard on something, I think it's common to ask for a positive review. People are sentient enough to choose whether to do so.

[–] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

“Drop honest feedback please!” is a much better response than “positive bomb this game please!”

[–] Bezier@suppo.fi 1 points 2 days ago (2 children)

The article states it got review bombed (but not what for). Dishonest negative score kinda throws out legitimacy of the whole thing, making it a bit less bad. I feel for the desperate dev, but I guess I still agree with you.

[–] mohab@piefed.social 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Except they did not get review bombed and the article is blindly using the studio head as a source. Go look at the reviews, there actually is a ton of valuable feedback there.

They kinda did. They pushed out a sizable update that fixed a bunch of issues, but also upped the difficulty. People liked the improvements, but not the difficulty change, and my understanding is that they fixed that issue quickly but not before a bunch of people complained about it.

I get where they're coming from, but I also don't like them sking for positive reviews.

[–] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Depends the heuristics used. Bombing reviews most times do not cite their contentions, which can be dismissed.

[–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Review bombing requires

  1. A scandal, and there's no indication Half Moon was involved in any such.
  2. Coordination, which is easy enough to find on Google or elsewhere. Again, no indication of such.
  3. Most of the time, at least some reviews in the bomb will state why they are downvoting the game. No indication of such.

Sometimes bad reviews are just bad reviews.

[–] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social 2 points 1 day ago

But the Studio wants 🌈positive reviews🌈 bombing.